Persistent latent reservoir of replication-competent proviruses in memory CD4 T cells is a major obstacle to curing HIV infection. Pharmacological activation of HIV expression in latently infected cells is being explored as one of the strategies to deplete the latent HIV reservoir. In this study, we characterized the ability of romidepsin (RMD), a histone deacetylase inhibitor approved for the treatment of T-cell lymphomas, to activate the expression of latent HIV. In an in vitro T-cell model of HIV latency, RMD was the most potent inducer of HIV (EC50 = 4.5 nM) compared with vorinostat (VOR; EC50 = 3,950 nM) and other histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors in clinical development including panobinostat (PNB; EC50 = 10 nM). The HIV induction potencies of RMD, VOR, and PNB paralleled their inhibitory activities against multiple human HDAC isoenzymes. In both resting and memory CD4 T cells isolated from HIV-infected patients on suppressive combination antiretroviral therapy (cART), a 4-hour exposure to 40 nM RMD induced a mean 6-fold increase in intracellular HIV RNA levels, whereas a 24-hour treatment with 1 µM VOR resulted in 2- to 3-fold increases. RMD-induced intracellular HIV RNA expression persisted for 48 hours and correlated with sustained inhibition of cell-associated HDAC activity. By comparison, the induction of HIV RNA by VOR and PNB was transient and diminished after 24 hours. RMD also increased levels of extracellular HIV RNA and virions from both memory and resting CD4 T-cell cultures. The activation of HIV expression was observed at RMD concentrations below the drug plasma levels achieved by doses used in patients treated for T-cell lymphomas. In conclusion, RMD induces HIV expression ex vivo at concentrations that can be achieved clinically, indicating that the drug may reactivate latent HIV in patients on suppressive cART.

Members of the class B family of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) bind peptide hormones and have causal roles in many diseases, ranging from diabetes and osteoporosis to anxiety. Although peptide, small-molecule, and antibody inhibitors of these GPCRs have been identified, structure-based descriptions of receptor antagonism are scarce. Here we report the mechanisms of glucagon receptor inhibition by blocking antibodies targeting the receptor's extracellular domain (ECD). These studies uncovered a role for the ECD as an intrinsic negative regulator of receptor activity. The crystal structure of the ECD in complex with the Fab fragment of one antibody, mAb1, reveals that this antibody inhibits glucagon receptor by occluding a surface extending across the entire hormone-binding cleft. A second antibody, mAb23, blocks glucagon binding and inhibits basal receptor activity, indicating that it is an inverse agonist and that the ECD can negatively regulate receptor activity independent of ligand binding. Biochemical analyses of receptor mutants in the context of a high-resolution ECD structure show that this previously unrecognized inhibitory activity of the ECD involves an interaction with the third extracellular loop of the receptor and suggest that glucagon-mediated structural changes in the ECD accompany receptor activation. These studies have implications for the design of drugs to treat class B GPCR-related diseases, including the potential for developing novel allosteric regulators that target the ECDs of these receptors.T he glucagon receptor (GCGR) is a member of the class B G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) family (1) that mediates the activity of glucagon, a pancreatic islet-derived peptide hormone that plays a central role in the pathophysiology of diabetes (2). Several GCGR antagonists that improve glycemic control in animal models of diabetes and diabetic patients have been described (3-8). Although biochemical studies of glucagon and GCGR mutants have facilitated the mapping of some elements that contribute to glucagon binding (4, 9-12), the molecular mechanisms of GCGR activation and inhibition remain largely unknown because there are currently no high-resolution structures of GCGR. The current model for activation class B GPCRs proposes a tethering mechanism whereby the C-terminal half of the peptide ligand first binds a large extracellular domain (ECD), thereby enabling a high-affinity interaction of the N-terminal half of the ligand with a cleft formed by the transmembrane α-helical bundle (13,14), termed the juxtamembrane (JM) domain. This interaction induces a structural change in the transmembrane and intracellular face of the receptor that enables G protein coupling, likely similar to that described for the activated form of the β-adrenergic receptor (15). Recent structural studies of several class B GPCR ECDs and ECD-ligand complexes support this model (16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21). Glucagon likely interacts with GCGR in a similar fashion to the interaction of other peptide ligands with class B GPC...

IN consists of 3 functional domains: the N-terminal domain (NTD; residues 1-51) that contains a conserved ''HH-CC'' zincbinding motif, the catalytic core domain (CCD; residues 52-210) with the catalytic residues (D64, D116, and E152), and the Cterminal domain (CTD; residues 210-288) that contributes to DNA binding (2). In solution, recombinant IN exists in a dynamic equilibrium between monomers, dimers, tetramers, and higherorder oligomers (3, 4). Monomers are reportedly inactive in vitro, whereas dimers are able to catalyze 3Ј processing and integration of 1 viral end (4-9). Tetramers, which have also been isolated from human cells expressing HIV-1 IN (10), can catalyze integration of 2 viral DNA ends into target DNA (7, 11), but the exact nature of the IN complex mediating 3Ј processing and strand transfer reactions remains to be determined. The integration step is an attractive drug target given its essential role in the viral life cycle and the lack of a cellular IN homologue. Strand transfer inhibitors appear to bind significantly better to IN when it is assembled on its DNA substrate than to IN alone (12). To date there is only 1 structure of an inhibitor bound to IN (13), and that is in the absence of DNA. The compound binds at the active site; however, it dimerizes across a crystallographic 2-fold axis and therefore might not be in its bioactive configuration.Structure-based understanding of the mechanisms of the action of IN inhibitors and optimization of compounds as potential drugs targeting HIV-1 IN have been hampered by the inability to capture and crystallize IN-DNA complexes. Two key factors have contributed to this problem: first, the high salt concentration (Ϸ1 M NaCl) required to maintain full-length IN in solution interferes with DNA binding; second, IN has intrinsically low affinity for DNA. To overcome these 2 obstacles, we used disulfide cross-linking to generate soluble, catalytically-active, covalent IN-DNA complexes. A similar strategy, covalent disulfide cross-linking between HIV-1 reverse transcriptase (RT) and DNA, mediated crystallization of the .Previous cross-linking from cysteinal mutations in the CTD (6) and CCD (15) Here, we describe an IN cysteine mutant, IN Y143C , which is able to form IN-DNA complexes efficiently. The IN Y143C -DNA complexes form stable tetramers in solution, retain single-end strand transfer activity, show increased resistance to protease and nuclease digestion, and bind a strand transfer inhibitor. This IN-DNA complex can serve as an in vitro platform to identify and evolve strand transfer inhibitors of HIV integration and as a means of understanding the basis for a key part of the integration reaction.

The application of phage display technology to mammalian proteins with multiple transmembrane regions has had limited success due to the difficulty in generating these proteins in sufficient amounts and purity. We report here a method that can be easily and generally applied to sorting of phage display libraries with multispan protein targets solubilized in detergent. A key feature of this approach is the production of biotinylated multispan proteins in virions of a baculovirus vector that allows library panning without prior purification of the target protein. We obtained Fab fragments from a naïve synthetic antibody phage library that, when engineered into full-length immunoglobulin (Ig)G, specifically bind cells expressing claudin-1, a protein with four transmembrane regions that is used as an entry co-receptor by the hepatitis C virus (HCV). Affinity-matured variants of one of these antibodies efficiently inhibited HCV infection. The use of baculovirus particles as a source of mammalian multispan protein facilitates the application of phage display to this difficult class of proteins.

Multi-transmembrane proteins are especially difficult targets for antibody generation largely due to the challenge of producing a protein that maintains its native conformation in the absence of a stabilizing membrane. Here, we describe an immunization strategy that successfully resulted in the identification of monoclonal antibodies that bind specifically to extracellular epitopes of a 12 transmembrane protein, multi-drug resistant protein 4 (MRP4). These monoclonal antibodies were developed following hydrodynamic tail vein immunization with a cytomegalovirus (CMV) promoter-based plasmid expressing MRP4 cDNA and were characterized by flow cytometry. As expected, the use of the immune modulators fetal liver tyrosine kinase 3 ligand (Flt3L) and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor positively enhanced the immune response against MRP4. Imaging studies using CMV-based plasmids expressing luciferase showed that the in vivo half-life of the target antigen was less than 48 h using CMV-based plasmids, thus necessitating frequent boosting with DNA to achieve an adequate immune response. We also describe a comparison of plasmids, which contained MRP4 cDNA with either the CMV or CAG promoters, used for immunizations. The observed luciferase activity in this comparison demonstrated that the CAG promoter-containing plasmid pCAGGS induced prolonged constitutive expression of MRP4 and an increased anti-MRP4 specific immune response even when the plasmid was injected less frequently. The method described here is one that can be broadly applicable as a general immunization strategy to develop antibodies against multi-transmembrane proteins, as well as target antigens that are difficult to express or purify in native and functionally active conformation.