The cost-utility of polysomnography instead of home study or no testing in the diagnosis of OSAS compares favorably with that of other procedures for which society judges the added utility per dollar spent to be worthwhile. More precise determination of certain key variables in this model should be a goal of future research.

Objective: We report results of a community-based multisite, randomized controlled trial of Nuevo Amanecer (NA-II), a 10-week stress management program for rural, low literacy Latina breast cancer survivors. Methods: Trained peers delivered NA-II to Spanish-speaking Latinas with nonmetastatic breast cancer in three rural communities. Women were randomized to receive the program immediately or wait 6 months. Assessments were conducted at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months. Primary outcomes were breast cancer-specific quality of life domains; secondary outcomes included general distress symptoms and stress management skills. Intention-to-treat analyses using repeated-measures linear regression models estimated changes in slope between groups. Results: Of 153 participants (76 randomized to intervention, 77 to control group), 92% were retained at 6 months. Mean age was 54.8 years (SD = 10.5); 80% had less than high school education. There were no statistically significant treatment × time effects on quality of life. Compared to women in the control group, intervention group women reported greater improvements in anxiety at 6 months (−0.20 vs −0.02, P = .049; range 0-4) as well as three stress management skills: relaxation at 3 months (+0.98 vs −0.07, P < .0001; range 0-4) and 6 months (+0.82 vs +0.04, P < .001), awareness of tension at 3 months (+0.31 vs −0.19, P < .01; range 0-4) and 6 months (+0.29 vs −0.11, P < .05), and coping confidence at 3 months (+0.12 vs −0.23, P < .01; range 0-4). Conclusions: Stress management programs delivered by trained peers in rural community settings can reduce anxiety and improve stress management skills among Latina breast cancer survivors. Trial registration: http://www.ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02931552.

Objectives Opioid pain reliever (OPR) prescribing at Emergency Department (ED) discharge has increased in the past decade but specific prescription details are lacking. Prior ED OPR prescribing estimates relied on national survey extrapolation or prescription databases. The main goal of this study was to utilize a research consortium to analyze the characteristics of patients and opioid prescriptions using a national sample of ED patients. We also aimed to examine the indications for OPR prescribing, characteristics of opioids prescribed both in the ED and at the time of discharge, and characteristics of patients who received OPRs compared with those who did not. Methods This observational, multi-centered, retrospective cohort study assessed OPR prescribing to consecutive patients presenting to the consortium EDs during 1 week in October 2012. The consortium study sites consisted of 19 EDs representing 1.4 million annual visits, varied geographically, and were predominantly academic centers. Medical records of all patients aged 18-90 years discharged with an OPR (excluding tramadol) were individually abstracted via standardized chart review by investigators for detailed analysis. Descriptive statistics were generated. Results During the study week, 27,516 patient visits were evaluated in the consortium EDs. 19,321 (70.2%) were discharged and 3,284 patients (11.9% of all patients and 17.0% of discharged patients) received an OPR prescription. For those prescribed an OPR, mean age was 41.1 (SD 14.7) years and 1,694 (51.6%) were female. Mean initial pain score was 7.7 (SD 2.4). The most common diagnoses associated with OPR prescribing were back pain (10.2%), abdominal pain (10.1%), and extremity fracture (7.1%) or sprain (6.5%). The most common OPRs prescribed were oxycodone (52.3%), hydrocodone (40.9%) and codeine (4.8%). >99% were immediate release, 90.0% were combination preparations, and the mean and median number of pills was 16.6 (SD 7.6) and 15 (IQR=12-20) respectively. Conclusion In a study of ED patients treated over a single week across the country, 17% of discharged patients were prescribed OPRs. The majority of the prescriptions had small pill counts and almost exclusively immediate release formulations.

This study confirmed the previously reported respiratory restriction caused by spinal immobilization. Vacuum mattresses are more comfortable than wooden backboards.