ObjectiveCirculating microparticles (cMPs) are phospholipid-rich vesicles released from cells when activated or injured, and contribute to the formation of intracoronary thrombi. Tissue factor (TF, CD142) is the main trigger of fibrin formation and TF-carrying cMPs are considered one of the most procoagulant cMPs. Similar types of atherosclerotic lesions may lead to different types of AMI, although the mechanisms behind are unresolved. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the phenotype of cMPs found in plasma of ACS patients and its relation to AMI severity and thrombotic burden.MethodsIn a cross-sectional study, two hundred patients aged 75±4 years were included in the study 2–8 weeks after suffering an AMI. Annexin V positive (AV+)-cMPs derived from blood and vascular cells were measured by flow cytometry. Plasma procoagulant activity (TF-PCA) was measured through a chromogenic assay.ResultsSTEMI patients (n = 75) showed higher levels of platelet-derived cMPs [CD61+/AV+, CD31+/AV+, CD42b+/AV+ and CD31+/CD42b+/AV+, P = 0.048, 0.038, 0.009 and 0.006, respectively], compared to NSTEMI patients (n = 125). Patients who suffered a heart failure during AMI (n = 17) had increased levels of platelet (CD61+)-and monocyte (CD14+)-derived cMPs carrying TF (CD142+) (P<0.0001 and 0.004, respectively). Additionally, NYHA class III (n = 23) patients showed higher levels of CD142+/AV+, CD14+/AV+ and CD14+/CD142+/AV+ cMPs than those in class I/II (P = 0.001, 0.015 and 0.014, respectively). The levels of these cMPs positively correlated with TF-PCA (r≥0.166, P≤0.027, all).ConclusionsPlatelets and monocytes remain activated in AMI patients treated as per guidelines and release cMPs that discriminate AMI severity. Therefore, TF-MPs, and platelet- and monocyte-MPs may reflect thrombotic burden in AMI patients.

Background Neutrophil extracellular traps, comprising chromatin and granule proteins, have been implicated in atherothrombosis. Design and methods We investigated whether the circulating neutrophil extracellular traps markers, double-stranded DNA and myeloperoxidase-DNA were associated with clinical outcome and hypercoagulability in patients with stable coronary artery disease. Patients with angiographically verified stable coronary artery disease ( n = 1001) were included. Follow-up was 2 years, recording 106 clinical endpoints (unstable angina, non-haemorrhagic stroke, myocardial infarction or death). Serum collected at baseline was used to determine double-stranded DNA and myeloperoxidase-DNA levels. Results The neutrophil extracellular traps markers were weakly intercorrelated ( r = 0.103, P = 0.001). Patients with the highest quartile of double-stranded DNA had weakly but significantly elevated hypercoagulability markers (prothrombin fragment 1+2, D-dimer, free and total tissue factor pathway inhibitor ( P < 0.001 for all)). Men, smokers, patients with metabolic syndrome and patients with a previous myocardial infarction had significantly elevated double-stranded DNA levels ( P ≤ 0.002 for all). Significantly higher double-stranded DNA levels were observed in the group experiencing a clinical endpoint compared to the group without ( P = 0.019). When categorising double-stranded DNA into quartiles, a distinct cut-off between the lowest and upper three quartiles was observed. Adjusting for relevant covariates, patients in the upper three quartiles had an odds ratio of 2.01 (95% confidence interval 1.12, 3.58, P = 0.019) for experiencing a clinical endpoint. Myeloperoxidase-DNA was not significantly associated with clinical outcome or hypercoagulability. Conclusions Double-stranded DNA levels were significantly related to adverse clinical outcome after 2 years, but only weakly associated with hypercoagulability. These observations suggest that the detrimental effects of neutrophil extracellular traps in coronary artery disease might extend beyond those related to hypercoagulability.

Monocyte-derived cMPs assessed in the acute phase relate to the prognosis of CV death at the long term. These findings may be of clinical interest in the risk assessment of STEMI patients.

No abstract