Dynamic studies in time course experimental designs and clinical approaches have been widely used by the biomedical community. These applications are particularly relevant in stimuli-response models under environmental conditions, characterization of gradient biological processes in developmental biology, identification of therapeutic effects in clinical trials, disease progressive models, cell-cycle, and circadian periodicity. Despite their feasibility and popularity, sophisticated dynamic methods that are well validated in large-scale comparative studies, in terms of statistical and computational rigor, are less benchmarked, comparing to their static counterparts. To date, a number of novel methods in bulk RNA-Seq data have been developed for the various time-dependent stimuli, circadian rhythms, cell-lineage in differentiation, and disease progression. Here, we comprehensively review a key set of representative dynamic strategies and discuss current issues associated with the detection of dynamically changing genes. We also provide recommendations for future directions for studying non-periodical, periodical time course data, and meta-dynamic datasets.

Data contamination in meta-approaches where multiple biological samples are combined considerably affects the results of subsequent downstream analyses, such as differential abundance tests comparing multiple groups at a fixed time point. Little has been thoroughly investigated regarding the impact of the lurking variable of various batch sources, such as different days or different laboratories, in more complicated time series experimental designs, for instance, repeatedly measured longitudinal data and metadata. We highlight that the influence of batch factors is significant on subsequent downstream analyses, including longitudinal differential abundance tests, by performing a case study of microbiome time course data with two treatment groups and a simulation study of mimic microbiome longitudinal counts.