OBJECTIVE To assess the effect of anti-CD20 B-cell depletion with rituximab (RTX) on relapse rates in myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disorder (MOGAD). METHODS Retrospective review of RTX-treated MOGAD patients from 29 centres in 13 countries. The primary outcome measure was change in relapse rate after starting rituximab (Poisson regression model). RE-SULTS Data on 121 patients were analysed, including 30 (24.8%) children. Twenty/121 (16.5%) were treated after one attack, of whom 14/20 (70.0%) remained relapse-free after median (IQR) 11.2 (6.3-14.1) months. The remainder (101/121, 83.5%) were treated after two or more attacks, of whom 53/101 (52.5%) remained relapse-free after median 12.1 (6.3-24.9) months. In this 'relapsing group', relapse rate declined by 37% (95%CI=19-52%, p<0.001) overall, 63% (95%CI=35-79%, p = 0.001) when RTX was used first line (n = 47), and 26% (95%CI=2-44%, p = 0.038) when used after other steroid-sparing immunotherapies (n = 54). Predicted 1-year and 2-year relapse-free survival was 79% and 55% for first-line RTX therapy, and 38% and 18% for second-/third-line therapy. Circulating CD19 + B-cells were suppressed to <1% of total circulating lymphocyte population at the time of 45/57 (78.9%) relapses. CONCLUSION RTX reduced relapse rates in MOGAD. However, many patients continued to relapse despite apparent B-cell depletion. Prospective controlled studies are needed to validate these results.

Introduction-While monophasic and relapsing forms of myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody associated disorders (MOGAD) are increasingly diagnosed world-wide, consensus on management is yet to be developed. Objective-To survey the current global clinical practice of clinicians treating MOGAD.Method-Neurologists worldwide with expertise in treating MOGAD participated in an online survey (February-April 2019).Results-Fifty-two responses were received (response rate 60.5%) from 86 invited experts, comprising adult (78.8%, 41/52) and paediatric (21.2%, 11/52) neurologists in 22 countries. All treat acute attacks with high dose corticosteroids. If recovery is incomplete, 71.2% (37/52) proceed next to plasma exchange (PE). 45.5% (5/11) of paediatric neurologists use IV immunoglobulin (IVIg) in preference to PE. Following an acute attack, 55.8% (29/52) of respondents typically continue corticosteroids for ≤ 3 months; though less commonly when treating children. After an index event, 60% (31/51) usually start steroid-sparing maintenance therapy (MT); after ≤ 2 attacks 92.3% (48/52) would start MT. Repeat MOG antibody status is used by 52.9% (27/51) to help decide on MT initiation. Commonly used first line MTs in adults are azathioprine (30.8%, 16/52), mycophenolate mofetil (25.0%, 13/52) and rituximab (17.3%, 9/52). In children, IVIg is the preferred first line MT (54.5%; 6/11). Treatment response is monitored by MRI (53.8%; 28/52), optical coherence tomography (23.1%; 12/52) and MOG antibody titres (36.5%; 19/52). Regardless of monitoring results, 25.0% (13/52) would not stop MT. Conclusion-Current treatment of MOGAD is highly variable, indicating a need for consensusbased treatment guidelines, while awaiting definitive clinical trials.

ObjectiveTo identify factors predictive of relapse risk and disability in myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein associated disease (MOGAD).SettingPatients were seen by the neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) service in Liverpool, UK, a national referral centre for adult patients with MOGAD, NMOSD and related conditions.ParticipantsPatients with MOGAD=76 from England, Northern Ireland and Scotland were included in this cohort study.ResultsRelapsing disease was observed in 55% (42/76) of cases. Steroid treatment >1 month (OR 0.2, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.80; p=0.022), transverse myelitis (TM) at first attack (OR 0.03, 95% CI 0.004 to 0.23; p=0.001) and male sex (OR 0.16, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.68; p=0.014) were associated with monophasic disease (area under the curve=0.85). Male sex (HR 0.46, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.89; p=0.011) and TM at disease onset (HR 0.42, 95% CI 0.22 to 0.82; p=0.011) were also associated with an increased latency to first relapse. 45% (32/71) of patients became MOG-antibody negative and in relapsing patients negative seroconversion was associated with a lower relapse risk (relative risk 0.11 95% CI 0.05 to 0.26; p<0.001). No specific factors were predictive of visual or overall disability.ConclusionsMale patients with spinal cord involvement at disease onset have a lower risk of relapsing disease and longer latency to first relapse. Steroid treatment for at least 1 month at first attack was also associated with a monophasic disease course. MOG-antibody negative seroconversion was associated with a lower risk of relapse and may help inform treatment decisions and duration.

Pain is one of the most common complaints for which patients approach physicians. In spite of this there is a huge unmet need for developing medications for pain that are safe and efficacious. Owing to the heterogeneity of clinical pain and complex pathophysiology, target identification for drug development is difficult. Preclinical models have also proven unreliable for the development of novel analgesics. Recent advances in understanding the physiology of nociception has enabled the development of novel analgesics including abuse deterrent opioids, drugs targeting several receptors, ion channels and enzymes. This review will attempt to cover the physiology of nociception focusing on the novel targets, the challenges in development of novel analgesics and give an overview of the recently developed drugs and those in the pipeline for the management of pain.

IntroductionRituximab is an effective treatment for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) but the ideal dosing regimen is unknown. This study compares a standard fixed dosing regimen (2 g 6-monthly) with a lower variable dosing regimen (2 g induction, then 1–2 g on repopulation of CD19+ B-cells to ≥1% of circulating lymphocytes, tested monthly).MethodRetrospective review of all rituximab-treated adult NMOSD patients who had at least 6months relapse-free follow-up from treatment initiation (n=52). Rituximab dosing fell into four groups: Purely fixed dosing (n=13), purely variable dosing (n=18), fixed then variable dosing (n=18), other (n=3).ResultsMedian annualized relapse rate (ARR) was not significantly different between these groups. Pooled analysis of all fixed dosing (n=31, median duration 25 months) versus all variable dosing (n=36, median duration 38 months) showed median and mean ARRs of 0.00 and 0.10 in both groups. Patients on fixed dosing received a median 3.9 infusions/year; those on variable doing received only 1.5 infusions/year.ConclusionVariable dosing of rituximab with B-cell monitoring appears as effective as fixed dosing with lower cumulative drug doses. This approach led to reduced costs, increased patient convenience and has the potential for reducing side effects.