We have recently demonstrated that selective inducible nitric oxide (NO) synthase (iNOS) inhibition with 1400W attenuated the hemodynamic and metabolic alterations affiliated with hyperdynamic porcine endotoxemia. In contrast to endotoxemia, limited evidence is available to document a relationship between NO and organ dysfunction in large animal bacteremic models. Therefore, using the same experimental setup, we investigated the role of selective iNOS blockade in porcine bacteremia induced and maintained for 24 h with a continuous infusion of live Pseudomonas aeruginosa. After 12 h of sepsis, animals received either vehicle (Control, n = 8) or continuous infusion of selective iNOS inhibitor, L-N6-(1-iminoethyl)-lysine (L-NIL; n = 8). Measurements were performed before, and 12, 18, and 24 h after P. aeruginosa infusion. L-NIL inhibited sepsis-induced increase in plasma nitrate/nitrite concentrations and prevented hypotension without affecting cardiac output. Despite comparable hepatosplanchnic macrocirculation, L-NIL blunted the progressive deterioration in ileal mucosal microcirculation and prevented mucosal acidosis. L-NIL largely attenuated mesenteric and hepatic venous acidosis, significantly improved P. aeruginosa-induced impairment of hepatosplanchnic redox state, and mitigated the decline in liver lactate clearance. Furthermore, the administration of L-NIL reduced the hepatocellular injury and prevented the development of renal dysfunction. Finally, treatment with L-NIL significantly attenuated the formation of 8-isoprostane concentrations, a direct marker of lipid peroxidation. Thus, selective iNOS inhibition with L-NIL prevented live bacteria from causing key features of metabolic derangements in porcine hyperdynamic sepsis. Underlying mechanisms probably include reduced oxidative stress with improved microcirculatory perfusion and restoration of cellular respiration.
The radical scavenger tempol partially prevented live bacteria from causing key features of hemodynamic and metabolic derangements in porcine hyperdynamic sepsis and beneficially affected surrogate markers of sepsis-induced endothelial and coagulation dysfunction. Incomplete reduction of oxidative stress because of dilutional effects and/or missed optimal therapeutic window for antioxidant treatment when used in posttreatment approach may account for the only partial protection by tempol in this model.
Background: Treatment with mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) has elicited considerable interest as an adjunctive therapy in sepsis. However, the encouraging effects of experiments with MSC in rodents have not been adequately studied in large-animal models with better relevance to human sepsis. Objectives: Here, we aimed to assess safety and efficacy of bone marrow-derived MSCs in a clinically relevant porcine model of progressive peritonitis-induced sepsis. Methods: Thirty-two anesthetized, mechanically ventilated, and instrumented pigs were randomly assigned into four groups (n = 8 per group): (1) sham-operated group (CONTROL); (2) sham-operated group treated with MSCs (MSC-CONTROL); (3) sepsis group with standard supportive care (SEPSIS); and (4) sepsis group treated with MSCs (MSC-SEPSIS). Peritoneal sepsis was induced by inoculating cultivated autologous feces. MSCs (1 × 10 6 /kg) were administered intravenously at 6 h after sepsis induction. Results: Before, 12, 18, and 24 h after the induction of peritonitis, we measured systemic, regional, and microvascular hemodynamics, multiple-organ functions, mitochondrial energy metabolism, systemic immune-inflammatory response, and oxidative stress. Administration of MSCs in the MSC-CONTROL group did not elicit any measurable acute effects. Treatment of septic animals with MSCs failed to mitigate sepsis-induced hemodynamic alterations or the gradual rise in Sepsis-related organ failure assessment scores. MSCs did not confer any protection against sepsis-mediated cellular myocardial depression and mitochondrial dysfunction. MSCs also failed to modulate the deregulated immune-inflammatory response. Horak et al. Stem Cell Therapy for Sepsis Conclusion: Intravenous administration of bone marrow-derived MSCs to healthy animals was well-tolerated. However, in this large-animal, clinically relevant peritonitis-induced sepsis model, MSCs were not capable of reversing any of the sepsis-induced disturbances in multiple biological, organ, and cellular systems.
Objectives: To investigate the potential benefits of vagus nerve stimulation in a clinically-relevant large animal model of progressive sepsis. Design: Prospective, controlled, randomized trial. Setting: University animal research laboratory. Subjects: Twenty-five domestic pigs were divided into three groups: 1) sepsis group (eight pigs), 2) sepsis + vagus nerve stimulation group (nine pigs), and 3) control sham group (eight pigs). Interventions: Sepsis was induced by cultivated autologous feces inoculation in anesthetized, mechanically ventilated, and surgically instrumented pigs and followed for 24 hours. Electrical stimulation of the cervical vagus nerve was initiated 6 hours after the induction of peritonitis and maintained throughout the experiment. Measurements and Main Results: Measurements of hemodynamics, electrocardiography, biochemistry, blood gases, cytokines, and blood cells were collected at baseline (just before peritonitis induction) and at the end of the in vivo experiment (24 hr after peritonitis induction). Subsequent in vitro analyses addressed cardiac contractility and calcium handling in isolated tissues and myocytes and analyzed mitochondrial function by ultrasensitive oxygraphy. Vagus nerve stimulation partially or completely prevented the development of hyperlactatemia, hyperdynamic circulation, cellular myocardial depression, shift in sympathovagal balance toward sympathetic dominance, and cardiac mitochondrial dysfunction, and reduced the number of activated monocytes. Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores and vasopressor requirements significantly decreased after vagus nerve stimulation. Conclusions: In a clinically-relevant large animal model of progressive sepsis, vagus nerve stimulation was associated with a number of beneficial effects that resulted in significantly attenuated multiple organ dysfunction and reduced vasopressor and fluid resuscitation requirements. This suggests that vagus nerve stimulation might provide a significant therapeutic potential that warrants further thorough investigation.
Sepsis, newly defined as a life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection, is the most common cause of death in ICUs and one of the principal causes of death worldwide. Although substantial progress has been made in the understanding of fundamental mechanisms of sepsis, translation of these advances into clinically effective therapies has been disappointing. Given the extreme complexity of sepsis pathogenesis, the paradigm “one disease, one drug” is obviously flawed and combinations of multiple targets that involve early immunomodulation and cellular protection are needed. In this context, the immune-reprogramming properties of cell-based therapy using mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) represent an emerging therapeutic strategy in sepsis and associated organ dysfunction. This article provides an update of the current knowledge regarding MSC in preclinical models of sepsis and sepsis-induced acute kidney injury. Recommendations for further translational research in this field are discussed.
Patients with serious infections at risk of deterioration represent highly challenging clinical situations, and in particular for junior doctors. A comprehensive clinical examination that integrates the assessment of vital signs, hemodynamics, and peripheral perfusion into clinical decision making is key to responding promptly and effectively to evolving acute medical illnesses, such as sepsis or septic shock. Against this background, the new concept of sepsis definition may provide a useful link between junior doctors and consultant decision making. The purpose of this article is to introduce the updated definition of sepsis and suggest its practical implications, with particular emphasis on integrative clinical assessment, allowing for the rapid identification of patients who are at risk of further deterioration.
As controversy persists regarding the benefits of mechanical circulatory support in septic shock with a predominantly vasoplegic phenotype, preclinical studies may provide a useful alternative to fill the actual knowledge gap. Here, we investigated the physiologic responses to venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation therapy (VA-ECMO) in a clinically relevant porcine peritonitis-induced model of refractory vasodilatory septic shock. In 12 anesthetized, mechanically ventilated, and instrumented domestic pigs, septic shock was induced by intraperitoneally inoculating autologous feces. After reaching the threshold for refractory vasodilatory shock (norepinephrine dose ≥1 μg/kg/min), the pigs were randomized into the conservative treatment group (control) or the VA-ECMO group (target flow 100 mL/kg/min). The time to develop refractory vasodilatory shock was similar in both groups (18.8 h in the ECMO group, 18.1 h in the control group). There was no difference between the groups in terms of time to death measured from the point of reaching the predefined vasopressor threshold (7.1 h for the ECMO group, 7.9 h for the control group). The initiation of ECMO resulted in a markedly increased fluid and vasopressor support. Although treatment with ECMO compromised neither renal nor carotid blood flow initially, both progressively decreased later during the experiment. The pattern of sepsis-induced multiorgan injury, alterations in energy metabolism, and the systemic inflammatory response were remarkably similar between both groups. In conclusion, the application of VA-ECMO in this model of peritonitis-induced refractory vasodilatory septic shock aggravated hemodynamic deterioration. Our findings contribute to increasing equipoise with respect to the clinical utility of VA-ECMO in refractory vasodilatory shock.
In the microbiological diagnosis of bloodstream infections (BSI), blood culture (BC) is considered the gold standard test despite its limitations such as low sensitivity and slow turnaround time. A new FDA‐cleared and CE‐marked platform utilizing magnetic resonance to detect amplified DNA of the six most common and/or problematic BSI pathogens (Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Escherichia coli; referred to as ESKAPEc) is available and may shorten the time to diagnosis and potentially improve antimicrobial utilization. Whole blood samples from hospitalized patients with clinical signs of sepsis were analyzed using the T2Bacteria Panel (T2Biosystems) and compared to simultaneously collected BC. Discrepant results were evaluated based on clinical infection criteria, combining supporting culture results and the opinion of treating physicians. A total of 55 samples from 53 patients were evaluated. The sensitivity and specificity of the T2Bacteria panel was 94% (16 out of 17 detections of T2Bacteria‐targeted organisms) and 100%, respectively, with 36.4% (8 of 22) causes of BSI detected only by this method. The T2Bacteria Panel detected pathogens on average 55 hours faster than standard BC. In our study, 9 of 15 patients with positive T2Bacteria Panel results received early‐targeted antibiotic therapy and/or modification of antimicrobial treatment based on T2Bacteria Panel findings. Given the high reliability, faster time to detection, and easy workflow, the technique qualifies as a point‐of‐care testing approach.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.