No abstract

Objectives:To investigate efficacy and safety of a single-tablet regimen of darunavir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (D/C/F/TAF) 800/150/200/10 mg vs. darunavir/cobicistat plus emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxyl fumarate (TDF) (control) in antiretroviral-treatment-naive, HIV-1-infected adults.Design:Phase-3, randomized, active-controlled, double-blind, international, multicenter, noninferiority study (NCT02431247).Methods:Seven hundred and twenty-five participants were randomized (1 : 1) to D/C/F/TAF (362) or control (363). The primary objective was to demonstrate noninferiority of D/C/F/TAF vs. control for percentage viral load less than 50 copies/ml (FDA-snapshot analysis) at 48 weeks (10% margin).Results:At week 48, D/C/F/TAF was noninferior to control (91.4 vs. 88.4% achieved viral load <50 copies/ml, respectively; difference 2.7%; 95% CI −1.6 to 7.1; P < 0.0001), with 4.4 vs. 3.3% of patients, respectively, having viral load greater or equal to 50 copies/ml. No treatment-emergent mutations associated with darunavir or TAF/TDF resistance were observed in either group. One patient (D/C/F/TAF) was identified with M184I/V conferring resistance to emtricitabine. Incidences of grades 3 and 4 adverse events (5 vs. 6%), serious adverse events (5 vs. 6%) and adverse event-related discontinuations (2 vs. 4%) were low and similar between groups. Mean decrease in urine protein/creatinine ratio was greater with D/C/F/TAF than control (−22.42 vs. −10.34 mg/g, P = 0.033). Mean percentage change in bone mineral density with D/C/F/TAF vs. control was 0.21 vs. −2.73%, P < 0.0001 (hip), −0.68 vs. −2.38%, P = 0.004 (lumbar spine), and −0.26 vs. −2.97%, P < 0.0001 (femoral neck). Median change from baseline in total cholesterol/HDL-cholesterol ratio was 0.20 vs. 0.08, P = 0.036.Conclusion:D/C/F/TAF achieved a high virologic suppression rate (91.4%) and was noninferior to darunavir/cobicistat with F/TDF. D/C/F/TAF also demonstrated the bone and renal safety advantages of TAF in combination with darunavir/cobicistat.

Background: Darunavir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (D/C/F/TAF) 800/150/200/10 mg was investigated through 96 weeks in AMBER (NCT02431247). Methods: Treatment-naive, HIV-1-positive adults [screening plasma viral load ≥1000 copies/ml; CD4+ cell count >50 cells/μl) were randomized (1 : 1) to D/C/F/TAF (N = 362) or D/C plus emtricitabine/tenofovir-disoproxil-fumarate (F/TDF) (N = 363) over at least 48 weeks. After week 48, patients could continue on or switch to D/C/F/TAF in an open-label extension phase until week 96. Results: At week 96, D/C/F/TAF exposure was 626 patient-years (D/C/F/TAF arm) and 109 patient-years (control arm post switch), week 96 virologic suppression (viral load <50 copies/ml; FDA-Snapshot, from baseline) was 85.1% (308/362) (D/C/F/TAF) and 83.7% (304/363) (control). Week 96 virologic failure (viral load ≥50 copies/ml; FDA-Snapshot) was 5.5% (20/362) and 4.4% (16/363), respectively. No darunavir, primary protease inhibitor or tenofovir resistance-associated mutations (RAMs) were observed post baseline. In one patient in each arm, an M184I and/or V RAM was detected. Few adverse event-related discontinuations (3% D/C/F/TAF; <1% control post switch) and no deaths occurred on D/C/F/TAF. Improved renal and bone parameters were maintained in the D/C/F/TAF arm and observed in the control arm post switch. Increases in total-cholesterol/high-density-lipoprotein--cholesterol rtio at week 96 were +0.25 versus baseline (D/C/F/TAF) and +0.24 versus switch (control). Conclusion: At week 96, D/C/F/TAF resulted in high virologic response and low virologic failure rates, with no resistance development to darunavir or TAF/TDF. Bone, renal and lipid safety were consistent with known D/C/F/TAF component profiles. Control arm safety post switch was consistent with the D/C/F/TAF arm. AMBER week 96 results confirm the efficacy, high barrier to resistance and bone/renal safety benefits of D/C/F/TAF for treatment-naive patients.

No abstract

BackgroundThe QD STR D/C/F/TAF 800/150/200/10 mg was noninferior to bPI + F/TDF at 48 weeks in EMERALD. Efficacy and safety of D/C/F/TAF through week 96 are presented.MethodsEMERALD (NCT02269917) is a randomized, active-controlled, open-label, international, multicenter noninferiority trial. Virologically suppressed (VL<50 c/mL for ≥2 months) ART experienced (previous non-DRV VF allowed) HIV-1-infected adults were randomized (2:1) to switch to D/C/F/TAF or continue bPI + F/TDF over 48 weeks. Patients could then continue on D/C/F/TAF or switch from bPI + F/TDF to D/C/F/TAF at week 52 (Late switch, 44 weeks D/C/F/TAF exposure) in a single-arm extension phase until week 96. The percentage of patients with virologic rebound (confirmed VL ≥50 c/mL) cumulative through week 48 and week 96 were primary and secondary endpoints, respectively.ResultsOf 1141 randomized and treated patients (58% had received ≥5 previous ARVs including screening ARVs; 15% had previous non-DRV VF), 1,080 continued in the extension phase (N = 728 D/C/F/TAF; N = 352 late switch). Few patients had virologic rebound cumulative through week 96 in the D/C/F/TAF arm (3.1%, 24/763). Virologic rebound occurred in 2.3% (8/352) in the late switch arm over 44 weeks D/C/F/TAF treatment. Many rebounders (14/24 and 2/8) resuppressed by week 96. At week 96 a high percentage of patients in the D/C/F/TAF arm (90.7%, 692/763) were suppressed (VL<50 c/mL). In the late switch arm, 93.8% (330/352) maintained virologic suppression after 44 weeks of treatment. No DRV, primary PI, TFV, or FTC RAMs were seen post baseline. Few serious AEs and AE related discontinuations occurred in either arm (Table 1). Improvements in renal and bone parameters were maintained in the D/C/F/TAF arm and seen in the late switch arm (week 52–96), with a small change in TC/HDL-C ratio (Table 1).ConclusionSwitching to D/C/F/TAF maintained high virologic suppression rates (>90%) at week 96 with no resistance development, and was well tolerated over 96 weeks with bone, renal, and lipid safety consistent with known TAF and cobicistat profiles. Efficacy and safety results in the late switch arm were consistent with week 48 results in the D/C/F/TAF arm. D/C/F/TAF combines the efficacy and high genetic barrier to resistance of DRV with the safety benefits of TAF, even in patients with a history of non-DRV VF. Disclosures J. Eron Jr., Gilead: Consultant and Grant Investigator, Consulting fee and Research grant. Janssen: Consultant, Consulting fee and Research grant. C. Orkin, AbbVie, Abbott, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, Gilead, GSK, Janssen, ViiV: Grant Investigator and Research Contractor, Research grant and Research support. D. Cunningham, Janssen: Investigator, Research grant. Gilead: Investigator, Research grant. F. Pulido, Janssen: Consultant, Investigator and Scientific Advisor, Consulting fee, Research support and Speaker honorarium. F. Post, Gilead: Consultant and Grant Investigator, Consulting fee and Grant recipient. Viiv: Grant Investigator, Grant recipient. Janssen: Consultant, Co...

BackgroundEMERALD is evaluating the efficacy and safety of switching from bPI + FTC/TDF regimens (control) to D/C/F/TAF 800/150/200/10 mg in virologically suppressed, HIV-1-infected adults. We present Week 48 primary results.MethodEMERALD (NCT02269917) is a randomized, active-controlled, open-label, international, multicenter, parallel-group, non-inferiority trial. Virologically suppressed (viral load [VL] < 50 c/mL for ≥2 months), HIV-1-infected adults were randomized (2:1) to switch to D/C/F/TAF or continue control. The FDA-stipulated primary endpoint was non-inferiority of D/C/F/TAF vs. control regarding % virologic rebound (confirmed VL ≥ 50 c/mL or premature discontinuations with last VL ≥ 50 c/mL) cumulative through Week 48 (4% margin).Result1141 patients were randomized and treated (N = 763 D/C/F/TAF; N = 378 control); median age 46; 18% women; 76% white; 58% on >2 previous ARVs (prior to screening regimen); 15% with previous non-DRV virologic failure (VF). Virologic rebound through Week 48 was non-inferior for D/C/F/TAF (2.5%; n = 19) vs. control (2.1%; n = 8) (Δ0.4%, 95% CI: –1.5%; 2.2%; P < 0.001). Most rebounders (12/19 [63%] vs. 4/8 [50%]) resuppressed by Week 48 without change in therapy. Week 48 virologic suppression rates (VL < 50 c/mL; FDA Snapshot) were 94.9% vs. 93.7% (Δ1.2%, 95% CI: −1.7%;4.1%) and VF rates (VL ≥ 50 c/mL; Snapshot) were 0.8% vs. 0.5% (Δ0.3%, 95% CI: −0.7%;1.2%), with no discontinuations for VF. No resistance-associated mutations related to any study drug were observed.Adverse events (AEs) were similar between arms: AE-related discontinuations (1.4% vs. 1.3%); grade 3–4 AEs (6.8% vs. 8.2%); serious AEs (4.6% vs. 4.8%); and no deaths. Renal and bone parameters favored D/C/F/TAF vs. control. TC and LDL-C slightly favored control vs. D/C/F/TAF, with no clinically significant difference in TC/HDL-C ratio between arms (Table 1).ConclusionPercentage of virologic rebound after switching to D/C/F/TAF was non-inferior to control cumulative through Week 48, with high suppression rates (94.9%), no resistance development, better bone and renal safety parameters and similar TC/HDL-C ratio. D/C/F/TAF maintains the high genetic barrier to resistance of darunavir with the safety advantages of TAF, even in patients with a history of non-DRV VF.Table 1:Changes from baseline at Week 48 in renal, lipid, and bone parametersDisclosuresC. Orkin, Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Grant Investigator, Scientific Advisor and Speaker’s Bureau, Consulting fee, Research grant, Speaker honorarium and Travel bursary to attend conference. MSD: Grant Investigator, Scientific Advisor and Speaker’s Bureau, Consulting fee, Research grant, Speaker honorarium and Travel bursary to attend conference. Viiv Healthcare: Grant Investigator, Scientific Advisor and Speaker’s Bureau, Consulting fee, Research grant, Speaker honorarium and Travel bursary to attend conference. Gilead Sciences: Grant Investigator, Scientific Advisor and Speaker’s Bureau, Consulting fee, Research grant, Speaker honorarium and Travel bursary to att...

No abstract