SignificanceNitric oxide synthase-2 (NOS2) and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX2) are inflammation-associated enzymes with oncogenic function in breast cancer. We show that crosstalk between NOS2/COX2 promotes aggressive phenotypes and that elevated coexpression of NOS2/COX2 in tumors predict significantly reduced patient survival (33%) when compared with 95% survival of estrogen receptor-negative patients with low NOS2/COX2 tumor expression. In addition, we have identified a tumor subtype-specific mechanism showing involvement of TNFα and/or endoplasmic reticulum stress as key players in this autocrine loop. Importantly, the simultaneous inhibition of NOS2/COX2 significantly reduced tumor growth in a xenograft murine model, suggesting that targeted inhibition of NOS2/COX2 may be therapeutically beneficial.

Angiogenesis is a hallmark of tumor development and metastatic progression, and antiangiogenic drugs targeting the VEGF pathway have shown to decrease the disease progression in cancer patients. In this study, we have analyzed the anti-proliferative and anti-angiogenic property of plumbagin in cisplatin sensitive, BRCA2 deficient, PEO-1 and cisplatin resistant, BRCA2 proficient PEO-4 ovarian cancer cells. Both PEO-1 and PEO-4 ovarian cancer cells are sensitive to plumbagin irrespective of BRCA2 status in both normoxia and hypoxia. Importantly, plumbagin treatment effectively inhibits VEGF-A and Glut-1 in PEO-1 and PEO-4 ovarian cancer cells. We have also analyzed the p53 mutant, cisplatin resistant, and BRCA2 proficient OVCAR-5 cells. Plumbagin challenge also restricts the VEGF induced pro-angiogenenic signaling in HUVECs and subsequently endothelial cell proliferation. In addition, we observe a significant effect on tumor regression among OVCAR-5 tumor-bearing mice treated with plumbagin, which is associated with significant inhibition of Ki67 and vWF expressions. Plumbagin also significantly reduces CD31 expression in an ear angiogenesis assay. Collectively, our studies indicate that plumbagin, as an anti-cancer agent disrupts growth of ovarian cancer cells through the inhibition of proliferation as well as angiogenesis.

Understanding the source of NO and its spaciotemporal profile within the tumor microenvironment could help improve efficacy of cancer immunotherapies by improving tumor infiltration of immune cells for better tumor clearance. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 00, 000-000.

The elucidation of these and other NO-driven pathways implicates NOS2 as a key driver of breast cancer disease progression and provides a new perspective in the identification of novel targets that may be therapeutically beneficial in the treatment of estrogen receptor-negative disease. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 26, 1044-1058.

Understanding the underlying mechanism involved in NOS2 activation can provide new insights into important prevention and treatment strategies. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 26, 1059-1077.

The role of nitric oxide (NO) in cancer progression has largely been studied in the context of tumor NOS2 expression. However, pro- versus anti-tumor signaling is also affected by tumor cell-macrophage interactions. While these cell-cell interactions are partly regulated by NO, the functional effects of NO flux on proinflammatory (M1) macrophages are unknown. Using a triple negative murine breast cancer model, we explored the potential role of macrophage Nos2 on 4T1 tumor progression. The effects of NO on macrophage phenotype were examined in bone marrow derived macrophages from wild type and Nos2−/− mice following in vitro stimulation with cytokine/LPS combinations to produce low, medium, and high NO flux. Remarkably, Nos2 induction was spatially distinct, where Nos2high cells expressed low cyclooxygenase-2 (Cox2) and vice versa. Importantly, in vitro M1 polarization with IFNγ+LPS induced high NO flux that was restricted to cells harboring depolarized mitochondria. This flux altered the magnitude and spatial extent of hypoxic gradients. Metabolic and single cell analyses demonstrated that single cell Nos2 induction limited the generation of hypoxic gradients in vitro, and Nos2-dependent and independent features may collaborate to regulate M1 functionality. It was found that Cox2 expression was important for Nos2high cells to maintain NO tolerance. Furthermore, Nos2 and Cox2 expression in 4T1 mouse tumors was spatially orthogonal forming distinct cellular neighborhoods. In summary, the location and type of Nos2high cells, NO flux, and the inflammatory status of other cells, such as Cox2high cells in the tumor niche contribute to Nos2 inflammatory mechanisms that promote disease progression of 4T1 tumors.

In tumor biology, nitric oxide (NO) is generally regarded as an immunosuppressive molecule that impedes T-cell functions and activation of endothelial cells. Contrasting with this view, we here describe a critical role for NO derived from inducible nitric oxide (iNOS)-expressing tumor macrophages in T-cell infiltration and tumor rejection as shown by iNOS gene deletion, inhibition of iNOS, or NO donors. Specifically, macrophage-derived NO was found to induce on tumor vessels adhesion molecules that were required for T-cell extravasation. Experiments with human endothelial cells revealed a bimodal dose-dependent effect of NO. High doses of NO donors were indeed suppressive but lower, more physiological concentrations, induced adhesion molecules in an NFkB-dependent pathway and preferentially activated transcription of genes involved in lymphocyte diapedesis. iNOS C macrophages in tumors appear to generate precisely the amount of NO that promotes endothelial activation and T-cell infiltration. These results will be valuable for the development of strategies designed to overcome the paucity of T-cell infiltration into tumors that is a major obstacle in clinical cancer immunotherapy.

No abstract