In this work, we demonstrate a new approach for assessing the stability and reproducibility of mass spectra obtained via ambient ionization methods. This method is suitable for both comparing experiments during which only one mass spectrum is measured and for evaluating the internal homogeneity of mass spectra collected over a period of time. The approach uses Pearson’s r coefficient and the cosine measure to compare the spectra. It is based on the visualization of dissimilarities between measurements, thus leading to the analysis of dissimilarity patterns. The cosine measure and correlations are compared to obtain better metrics for spectra homogeneity. The method filters out unreliable scans to prevent the analyzed sample from being wrongly characterized. The applicability of the method is demonstrated on a set of brain tumor samples. The developed method could be employed in neurosurgical applications, where mass spectrometry is used to monitor the intraoperative tumor border.

The development of perspective diagnostic techniques in medicine requires efficient high-throughput biological sample analysis methods. Here, we present an inline cartridge extraction that facilitates the screening rate of mass spectrometry shotgun lipidomic analysis of tissue samples. We illustrate the method by its application to tumor tissue identification in neurosurgery. In perspective, this high-performance method provides new possibilities for the investigation of cancer pathogenesis and metabolic disorders.

No abstract

Recently, mass-spectrometry methods show its utility in tumor boundary location.The effect of differences between research and clinical protocols such as low-and high-resolution measurements and sample storage have to be understood and taken into account to transfer methods from bench to bedside. In this study, we demonstrate a simple way to compare mass spectra obtained by different experimental protocols, assess its quality, and check for the presence of outliers and batch effect in the dataset. We compare the mass spectra of both fresh and frozen-thawed astrocytic brain tumor samples obtained with the inline cartridge extraction prior to electrospray ionization. Our results reveal the importance of both positive and negative ion mode mass spectrometry for getting reliable information about sample diversity. We show that positive mode highlights the difference between protocols of mass spectra measurement, such as fresh and frozen-thawed samples, whereas negative mode better characterizes the histological difference between samples. We also show how the use of similarity spectrum matrix helps to identify the proper choice of the measurement parameters, so data collection would be kept reliable, and analysis would be correct and meaningful. K E Y W O R D Sbrain tumor, data conversion, inline cartridge extraction, low-and high-resolution comparison, spectra stability and reproducibility | INTRODUCTIONFast tissue profiling methods for mass spectrometers allowed developing methods of rapid analysis of biological substances. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7] There are a lot of attempts to incorporate mass spectrometry into the clinical routine for surgery assistance purposes. [8][9][10][11][12] Mass spectra of complex mixtures of biological molecules, even those whose mass is up to 1000 Da, is still rather a difficult task, because of the enormous diversity of molecules contained in biological tissues. 13,14 Despite the common practice of LC-MS/MS to be used as an instrument for accurate identification of complex mixture components, it could not be used as a routine technique for rapid analyses. 15 Therefore, rapid analyses

No abstract

Express MS identification of biological tissues has become a much more accessible research method due to the application of direct specimen ionization at atmospheric pressure. In contrast to traditional methods of analysis employing GC-MS methods for determining the molecular composition of the analyzed objects it eliminates the influence of mutual ion suppression. Despite significant progress in the field of direct MS of biological tissues, the question of mass spectrometric profile attribution to a certain type of tissue still remains open. The use of modern machine learning methods and protocols (e.g., “random forests”) enables us to trace possible relationships between the components of the sample MS profile and the result of brain tumor tissue classification (astrocytoma or glioblastoma). It has been shown that the most pronounced differences in the mass spectrometric profiles of these tumors are due to their lipid composition. Detection of statistically significant differences in lipid profiles of astrocytoma and glioblastoma may be used to perform an express test during surgery and inform the neurosurgeon what type of malignant tissue he is working with. The ability to accurately determine the boundaries of the neoplastic growth significantly improves the quality of both surgical intervention and postoperative rehabilitation, as well as the duration and quality of life of patients.

No abstract

No abstract