Biomarkers are very important indicators of normal and abnormal biological processes. Specific changes in pathologies, biochemistries and genetics can give us comprehensive information regarding the nature of any particular disease. A good biomarker should be precise and reliable, distinguishable between normal and interested disease, and differential between different diseases. It is believed that biomarkers have great potential in predicting chances for diseases, aiding in early diagnosis, and setting standards for the development of new remedies to treat diseases. New technologies have enabled scientists to identify biomarkers of several different neurodegenerative diseases. The followings, for instance, are only a few of the many new biomarkers that have been recently identified: the phosphorylated tau protein and aggregated β-amyloid peptide for Alzheimer's disease (AD), α-synuclein contained Lewy bodies and altered dopamine transporter (DAT) imaging for Parkinson's disease (PD), SOD mutations for familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and CAG repeats resulted from Huntington's gene mutations in Huntington's disease (HD). This article will focus on the most-recent findings of biomarkers belonging to the four mentioned neurodegenerative diseases.

No abstract

Objectives• To prospectively test whether a panel of biomarkers could identify patients with organ-confined disease likely to be upstaged at radical cystectomy (RC), as retrospective studies have found that cell-cycle-and proliferation-related biomarkers can help improve prognostic accuracy after RC. Patients and Methods• We prospectively performed p53, p21, p27, Ki67, and cyclin E1 immunohistochemical staining on transurethral resection of the bladder (TURB) specimens from 87 patients treated with RC for organ-confined urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (UCB).• The number of altered biomarkers was categorised as 'favourable' (≤2 altered markers) or 'unfavourable' (>2). Results• Expression of p53, p21, p27, cyclin E1, and Ki67 were altered in 61 (70%), 19 (22%), 26 (30%), four (5%), and 70 (80%) patients, respectively. • The median number of positive markers was two. In all, 47 (54%) patients were upstaged when T-stage was considered alone and 49 (56%) when T-and/or N-stage were considered both as upstaging.• In multivariable analyses that adjusted for the effects of age, clinical stage, concomitant carcinoma in situ, and time from TURB to RC, an 'unfavourable' biomarker score was independently associated with T-stage upstaging (hazard ratio [HR] 3.3, P = 0.024) but not T-and/or N-stage upstaging (HR 2.76, P = 0.06).• Addition of p27, number of positive markers, and biomarker score each increased the discrimination of a base model for prediction of T-stage upstaging (5%, 6%, and 5%, respectively) and T-and/or N-stage upstaging (4%, 6%, and 3%, respectively). Conclusions• Cell-cycle-and proliferation-related markers in the TURB specimen improve the prediction of upstaging at RC.• Such a marker panel may help identify patients with non-muscle-invasive UCB who are clinically under-staged needing RC and patients with muscle-invasive UCB who are likely to be non-organ-confined thereby potentially benefiting from neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

No abstract

Despite concern that surgeon fatigue may impact outcomes, our data suggests that performing several complex urological procedures consecutively is not associated with worse outcomes.

Purpose:To assess the concordance rate in alterations of molecular markers at the time of transurethral resection (TUR) and subsequent radical cystectomy (RC) among patients with high-grade urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (UCB).Methods:We prospectively performed immunohistochemical staining p53, p21, p27, Ki-67 and cyclin E1 on TUR and on RC specimens from 102 patients treated with RC and bilateral lymphadenectomy for high-grade UCB. We analyzed the concordance rate of individual markers and of the number of altered markers. Concordant and discordant findings were reported in the overall population and according to clinical stage.Results:Median patient age was 74 years (IQR 67–79) and mostly male (86%). Median time from TUR to RC was 1.5 months (IQR 1.0–2.4). Clinical stage at time of RC was cTa/Tis/T1 in 50% , cT2 in 47% , and cT4 in 1% of patients Nine (9%) patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The concordance of biomarkers between TUR and RC specimens was 92.2% , 77.5% , 80.4% , 77.5% , and 83.3% for cyclin E1, p21, p27, p53 and Ki-67, respectively. The concordance between number of altered biomarkers was 51.0%.Conclusions:The rate of individual marker alterations at time of TUR closely approximates that found at RC specimens. However, the correlation of number of altered markers is lower. Molecular marker status at TUR could help predict the marker status at RC and may help guide multimodal therapeutic planning.

No abstract

No abstract