Purpose To assess chronic liver disease (CLD) using multiparametric US in a private practice setting in a cohort of patients with increased skin-to-liver distance. Methods 110 consecutive patients with increased skin-to-liver distance scheduled for US assessment of CLD were reviewed for study completion time, liver stiffness values (LS), attenuation imaging, and shear wave dispersion slope. The ROI was placed 2 cm below the liver capsule. The study included patients with NAFLD/NASH (68), hepatitis C (30), prior Fontan surgery (1), elevated liver function tests (5), alcohol abuse (3), hepatitis B (2), and primary biliary cirrhosis (1). IQR/M values were obtained. Comparison of less experienced sonographers (LES) and more experienced sonographers (MES) were evaluated through Student's t test for independent data. Pearson coefficient r of correlation among quantitative variables was calculated. ResultsThe mean time to perform the exam was 129.7 ± 62.1 s. There was a statistically significant difference between LES and MES. The mean IQR/M for LS was 12.3 ± 5.5% m/s. Overall, in a cohort of difficult patients, 4.5% of LS values were not reliable. Fat quantification using attenuation imaging had a mean value of 0.60 ± 0.15 dB/cm/MHz (range 0.35-0.98 cm/dB/ MHz) with an IQR/M of 14.7 ± 9.2%. Less reliable measurements of steatosis were obtained in 4.5% of patients. The mean shear wave dispersion slope was 12.74 ± 4.05 (m/s)/kHz (range 7.7-27.5 (m/s)/kHz) with an IQR/M of 38.7 ± 20.2% (range 3-131%). 20.9% of patients had values suggestive of compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD). Conclusion Multiparametric US can provide assessment of CLD in less than 3 min in most patients and identify patients at risk for cACLD.

Background Medical students are applying to dramatically more ophthalmology residency programs than in the past, causing an increased administrative burden for programs and financial harm to students. This study considers the background of this situation and looks at how a lack of transparency surrounding potential residency match filters contributes. Furthermore, this study raises several potential solutions to this lack of transparency that may increase the functionality of the ophthalmology residency match. Objective The purpose of this study was to determine the availability and consistency of potential ophthalmology residency match filters through training program websites and the American Medical Association’s (AMA) Residency & Fellowship Database (FREIDA). Methods This study was a cross-sectional observational study of ophthalmology residency program websites and AMA's FREIDA database entries. For 119 ophthalmology residency programs, five potential filters were evaluated for both availability and consistency on individual residency websites and FREIDA. These filters were: (1) whether a program required a minimum United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 score; (2) minimum number of letters of recommendation required; 3) whether a minimum USMLE Step 2 score was required; (4) if the program accepts the Comprehensive Osteopathic Medical Licensing Examination (COMLEX) sequence in lieu of the USMLE; and (5) ability of the residency to sponsor a visa (J-1, H-1B, or F-1). Each program's website and FREIDA entry were independently evaluated by two authors to increase validity, with a third author brought in to break the tie in case of a disagreement. Results Only two ophthalmology residency programs had information about all five filters both available and consistent on their website and FREIDA. Inter-reviewer reliability was 92.5%. Conclusions Information about potential filters used in the ophthalmology residency match is neither publicly available nor consistent. This lack of transparency may contribute to the phenomenon of medical students applying to dramatically more ophthalmology residency programs. A standardized database of these filters is needed to increase transparency to applicants, which may reduce the expenses of medical students and the workload of program directors.

No abstract

No abstract

Polyorchidism, a very rare congenital anomaly, refers to the presence of more than 2 testes. It is often associated with many other pathologies including cryptorchidism, varicocele, testicular malignancy, and inguinal hernias.In this report, we describe a 40-year-old man who presented with an intermittently painful left groin, initially appearing as inguinal hernia. On ultrasound examination, a supernumerary testes and epididymis were found in the inguinal canal. The testes appeared sonographically normal with no evidence of associated pathologies. There was no evidence of an inguinal hernia containing fat or bowel.Ultrasound is essential in first-line diagnosis and classification of polyorchidism. Color Doppler ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging can be used to clarify findings if sonographic images are inconclusive. We also review relevant literature as it pertains to classification, embryology, and treatment options. Patient treatment is based on imaging findings; if associated pathologies or malignancy is suspected, aggressive treatment such as surgical excision may be necessary. Otherwise, conservative treatment may be all that is needed.