The conservation of the coastal marine environment requires the possession of information that enables the global quality of the environment to be evaluated reliably and relatively quickly. The use of biological indicators is often an appropriate method. Seagrasses in general, and Posidonia oceanica meadows in particular, are considered to be appropriate for biomonitoring because of their wide distribution, reasonable size, sedentary habit, easy collection and abundance and sensitivity to modifications of littoral zone. Reasoned management, on the scale of the whole Mediterranean basin, requires standardized methods of study, to be applied by both researchers and administrators, enabling comparable results to be obtained. This paper synthesises the existing methods applied to monitor P. oceanica meadows, identifies the most suitable techniques and suggests future research directions. From the results of a questionnaire, distributed to all the identified laboratories working on this topic, a list of the most commonly used descriptors was drawn up, together with the related research techniques (e.g. standardization, interest and limits, valuation of the results). It seems that the techniques used to study meadows are rather similar, but rarely identical, even though the various teams often refer to previously published works. This paper shows the interest of a practical guide that describes, in a standardized way, the most useful techniques enabling P. oceanica meadows to be used as an environmental descriptor. Indeed, it constitutes the first stage in the process.
ABSTRACT1. Excessive nutrient discharge, linked to human activities, is one of the main causes of the decline of seagrass meadows since it modifies two essential parameters controlling their primary production: the nutrient concentrations (especially nitrogen and phosphorus) and the irradiance.2. To investigate the behaviour of seagrass under varied conditions of light and/or nutrient concentrations, it is necessary to experimentally manipulate nutrient enrichment and light, either in situ or in artificial ecosystems. The available experimental information concerning the influences of light reduction and nutrient enrichments (N and P) on seagrass meadows are summarized.3. The protocols for experimentally reducing light vary considerably but all light reduction experiments show a decrease in seagrass vitality and physiological changes (e.g. promotes an increase in chlorophyll and tissue nitrogen), depending on the species-specific tolerance (light optima).4. A wide range of protocols for experimentally increasing nutrient levels have been applied, including varying the nutrient species quantities and ratios, as well as the sources and frequency of additions. Responses to N and/or P enrichment range from stimulation to direct or indirect inhibition, varying depending upon the species, the protocol implemented, the nutrient source (water column versus sediments), and other environmental conditions (e.g. interactions with factors such as temperature, grazing and light).5. Both light reduction and nutrient enrichment, can cause seagrass decline, through similar internal mechanisms, promoting an imbalance of internal nutrient supply ratios. Similar physiological responses can thus be observed (e.g. increase of N, P and chlorophyll contents of leaves).6. This study shows the close link between the physiology and morphology of seagrasses, with regard to environmental modifications. It also highlights their ability to provide information on environmental conditions by means of their responses.
Increases in the intensity of disturbances in coastal lagoons can lead to shifts in vegetation from aquatic angiosperms to macroalgal or phytoplankton communities. Such abrupt and discontinuous responses are facilitated by instability in the equilibrium controlling the trajectory of the community response. We hypothesized that the shift in macrophyte populations is reversible, and that this reversibility is dependent on changes in the pressures exerted on the watershed and lagoon functioning. Biguglia lagoon (Mediterranean Sea, Corsica) is an interesting case study for the evaluation of long-term coastal lagoon ecosystem functioning and the trajectory of submerged macrophyte responses to disturbances, to facilitate the appropriate restoration of ecosystems. We used historical data for a two hundred-year period to assess changes in human activities on the watershed of the Biguglia lagoon. Macrophyte mapping (from 1970) and monitoring data for dynamics (from 1999) were used to investigate the trajectory of the community response. The changes observed in this watershed included a large number of hydrological developments affecting salinity and resulting in changes in macrophyte distribution. Nutrient inputs over the last 40 years have led to a shift in the aquatic vegetation from predominantly aquatic angiosperm community to macroalgae and phytoplankton in 2007 (dystrophic crisis). Changes in hydrological management and improvements in sewage treatment after 2007 led to a significant increase of aquatic angiosperms over a relatively short period of time (4-5 years), particularly for Ruppia cirrhosa and Stuckenia pectinata. There has been a significant resurgence of Najas marina, due to changes in salinity. The observed community shift suggests that Biguglia lagoon is resilient and that the transition may be reversible. The restored communities closely resemble those present before Please note that this is an author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication following peer review. The definitive publisher-authenticated version is available on the publisher Web site.disturbance. These findings demonstrate the need to understand watershed exploitation and ecosystem variability in lagoon restoration.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.