Peer reviewed articlequalitative study was undertaken to understand public perceptions of hospital cleanliness and how this might be improved following national initiatives to reduce infection rates and invest in domestic services. Eleven focus groups were held across the West Midlands.Results demonstrated that perceptions are attained from a variety of sources. For patients and visitors the things they see, hear, smell and taste in hospitals and health services shaped their perceptions of cleanliness. For the public the media, friends and family are important. Key factors for attention include: ensuring hospital floors, walls, ceilings, doors and toilets are kept clean, tidy, and unstained; an absence of strong odours; patients have the opportunity for regular baths/showers; staff have clean hands and uniforms, have short, clean finger nails and hair tied back; and eye-catching material on why cleanliness is important as well as what people need to do. Participants were generally unaware of the symptoms of MRSA, Clostridium difficile or Norovirus.The results of the study suggest that attention needs to be focussed on developing effective communication strategies. This will only be possible by adopting a multifaceted approach and enabling collaborative working between infection control staff, communications teams and other frontline staff. Abstract 462047J IP00010.1177/1757177412462047Journal of Infection Prevention Peer reviewed article 2012
BACKGROUND The healthcare environment is recognized as a source for healthcare-acquired infection. Because cleaning practices are often erratic and always intermittent, we hypothesize that continuously antimicrobial surfaces offer superior control of surface bioburden. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the impact of a photocatalytic antimicrobial coating at near-patient, high-touch sites in a hospital ward. SETTING The study took place in 2 acute-care wards in a large acute-care hospital. METHODS A titanium dioxide-based photocatalytic coating was sprayed onto 6 surfaces in a 4-bed bay in a ward and compared under normal illumination against the same surfaces in an untreated ward: right and left bed rails, bed control, bedside locker, overbed table, and bed footboard. Using standardized methods, the overall microbial burden and presence of an indicator pathogen (Staphylococcus aureus) were assessed biweekly for 12 weeks. RESULTS Treated surfaces demonstrated significantly lower microbial burden than control sites, and the difference increased between treated and untreated surfaces during the study. Hygiene failures (>2.5 colony-forming units [CFU]/cm2) increased 2.6% per day for control surfaces (odds ratio [OR], 1.026; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.009-1.043; P=.003) but declined 2.5% per day for treated surfaces (OR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.925-0.977; P<.001). We detected no significant difference between coated and control surfaces regarding S. aureus contamination. CONCLUSION Photocatalytic coatings reduced the bioburden of high-risk surfaces in the healthcare environment. Treated surfaces became steadily cleaner, while untreated surfaces accumulated bioburden. This evaluation encourages a larger-scale investigation to ascertain whether the observed environmental amelioration has an effect on healthcare-acquired infection. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2018;39:398-404.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.