Mast cell neoplasia clinical presentation and biological behaviour vary considerably across mammalian species, ranging from a solitary benign mass to an aggressive systemic malignancy. Mutations in the KIT Proto‐Oncogene Receptor Tyrosine Kinase (KIT) gene are common molecular abnormalities involved in mast cell tumorigenesis. KIT mutations often occur in dog, cat and human neoplastic mast cells and result in altered Kit protein structure and function. In dogs, certain KIT mutations are associated with more malignant and lethal disease. In contrast, KIT mutations in feline and human mast cell neoplasms are not correlated with prognosis, but are of value in diagnosis and treatment planning in humans. KIT genetic abnormalities have not been well investigated in other species, although aberrant cytoplasmic Kit protein staining detected in neoplasms of the ferret, horse and cow resembles aberrant Kit staining patterns detected in neoplastic mast cells of dogs, cats and humans. Mutations within KIT are classified as either regulatory‐type or enzymatic pocket‐type mutations according to their location within the KIT Proto‐Oncogene. Mutations within the enzymatic pocket domain confer tumour resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Hence, knowledge of tumour KIT mutation status adds valuable information for optimizing patient treatment strategies. The use of TKIs in combination with conventional chemotherapeutics has opened a new treatment avenue for patients unresponsive to existing drugs. This review highlights the similarities and differences of mast cell neoplasia in mammals with a special focus on the involvement of KIT in the canine and feline forms in comparison to human mast cell neoplasia.

No abstract

DNA amplification by PCR detects KIT exon 11 internal tandem duplications in canine mast cell tumors (MCTs). Tissue-specific inhibitors often contaminate DNA extracted from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) canine MCTs, blocking PCR amplification and, consequently, preventing mutation detection. We used a commercial kit to extract DNA from FFPE canine MCTs. Two independent PCR assays, each with one primer set, were used to amplify target genes ( HPRT and KIT) directly after FFPE DNA extraction. PCR amplification failed with at least one primer set in 153 of 280 samples (54.6%, 95% CI: 48.8–60.5%). One or 2 DNA washing steps were required to remove PCR inhibitors in 130 of 280 (46.4%) and 23 of 280 (8.2%) of these cases, respectively. DNA concentration and quality (A260/A280 and A260/A230) either pre- or post-washing were not associated with ability of the samples to be amplified by PCR using both HPRT and KIT primer sets. Low-grade and subcutaneous MCTs were less likely to amplify directly after DNA extraction and without any washing steps compared to high-grade MCTs using KIT gene primers.

Background Dogs have a species‐specific susceptibility for developing mast cell tumours (MCTs). Mutations in the KIT proto‐oncogene (KIT) are known to contribute to the neoplastic biology of mast cells. In dogs, the most common KIT mutation is an internal tandem duplication (ITD) in exon 11 which has been considered a useful prognostic supplement to traditional histopathological tumour grading. Objective The aim of this retrospective study was to explore the importance of KIT exon 11 ITD mutation status and known clinical and pathological indices in predicting prognosis in a cohort of Australian dogs diagnosed with MCT. Methods Clinical parameters, survival data, and KIT mutation status were collected and assessed for 220 dogs with cutaneous or subcutaneous MCT (n = 189 and n = 31, respectively). Results In at least one of the multivariable models, tumour grade (cutaneous Kiupel low or high grade) or tumour subcutaneous location, multiple concurrent MCTs, metastasis at the time of surgery, and senior age were statistically significant in predicting the outcome (MCT‐related death and/or second MCT diagnosis) at 6‐ or 12‐month post‐tumour excision. KIT exon 11 ITD mutation status was not a significant predictor in any of the final multivariable models and was strongly correlated with high histological grade (p < 0.001). Conclusion In this sample of dogs, tumour histological grading remained the single most powerful prognostic indicator for MCT outcome. However, concurrent evaluation of multiple prognostically significant parameters provides information of potential value to inform therapeutic management for each patient.

Mast cell tumours (MCT) have been documented in numerous species and mutations within the KIT proto‐oncogene are implicated in the neoplastic biology of mast cells in humans, dogs and cats. This study determined high KIT gene nucleotide and Kit amino acid sequence homology between several species known to suffer mast cell neoplasia and especially high sequence conservation between the cheetah (Acinonyx jubatus) and domestic cat (Felis catus) KIT sequences. As a result, we hypothesised that KIT mutations would exist in the neoplastic DNA of four cheetahs diagnosed with MCT from a recent case series. PCR and Sanger sequencing identified conservative exon 6 KIT mutations in two of the four cheetahs. The mutations were different between the two cheetahs. Only wild‐type DNA in exons 6, 8, 9 and 11 of KIT was observed in the MCTs of the remaining two cheetahs. Twenty cutaneous MCTs from domestic cats were collected for KIT mutation comparison. Twelve tumours possessed a mutation within KIT exons 6, 8 or 9 (60%, 95% CI 38.5%‐81.5%). No mutations were detected in exon 11. There was no significant association between domestic feline MCT KIT mutation status and tumour histological grade (traditional schematic, P = .934; Sabattini 2‐tier schematic, P = .762) or mitotic index (P = .750). KIT mRNA and Kit protein sequences are conserved across species but the role of KIT in feline MCT pathogenesis is not completely understood.