644 Background: liver metastases (LM) from well-differentiated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (wd-GEP-NET) can develop in 28-77% of patients (pts) in their lifetime. Multiple treatments can provide radiological and symptomatic response. Our aim was to evaluate responses to locoregional (LRT) and systemic (SYST) treatments in wd-GEP-NET with LM. Methods: we included consecutive records of pts with confirmed histological diagnosis of wd-GEP-NET and radiological LM, treated at our institution between 2008-2019. Relevant variables were retrospectively extracted from electronic records. Radiological response was assessed with RECIST 1.1 by radiological independent review. Results: 55 pts, 45.5% male. Median age at LM diagnosis 49 years (IQR 41-63). Primary tumor sites: 49% pancreatic, 27.3% small intestine, 11% unknown, 12.7% others. WHO 2019 grade 1, 2 and 3 in 52.7, 41.8 and 1.8%, respectively. Twentynine tumors (52.7%) were functional, with carcinoid syndrome in n20. At LM diagnosis, 91% of pts had symptomatic disease: hormonal n8, local n4, systemic n4, hormonal + local n4, local + systemic n22, hormonal + systemic n5, hormonal + local + systemic n5. LM tumoral burden was <10% in 22%, 11-50% in 43.6, > 50% in 30.9% of pts. 49.1% of pts had extra hepatic metastatic disease. LRT to LM was administered to 32 pts: TAE/TACE n26, ablation n8. SYST to 22 pts: somatostatin analog n15, Lutetium-177 n4, chemotherapy n2, everolimus n1. 1 pt did not receive treatment. Response to treatments is shown. In the LRT group, -- pts developed complications: n16 postembolization syndrome, n2 infections, n3 liver failure, n7 others. There was 1-procedure-related death. Conclusions: Patients treated with LRT at our institution achieved similar efficacy and safety results compared to those reported by previous studies.[Table: see text]
327 Background: Advanced gastric cancer (GC) is a disease with high morbidity and poor prognosis. We hypothesize that different sites of metastasis have different impact in terms of symptoms and complications. We sought to evaluate if site specific morbidity in our patients impacted treatment and survival. Methods: Medical records from patients with advanced GC treated from Jan 2005 to Dec 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. Morbidity was defined as having any symptom by metastases in a specific site. OS was estimated by Kaplan Meier method and compared by Log-rank test. P value < 0.05 was considered significant. Results: We included 180 consecutive patients, median age at diagnosis was 56 years (21-90), 55% were women. Most common sites of metastases were: peritoneum 76.1%, non-regional lymph nodes 38.9%, liver 22.8%, lung 26.7%, bone 9.4% and ovary 12.8%. Regarding morbidity, at diagnosis 68% of patients presented morbidity by the primary tumor: obstruction 56%, bleeding 27%, obstruction and bleeding 3%, other 14%. Disease by peritoneum caused morbidity in 30%, by lung in 8%, by ovarian in 4.4%, by lymph nodes in 3.3%, and by other sites in 5.6% of patients. OS in the global cohort was: 3.53 months (2.2 to 4.8), nevertheless by univariate analysis we found that OS was affected by morbidity at some sites as it is show in table. More patients with peritoneal morbidity could not receive treatment vs those without peritoneal morbidity (p = 0.042). Conclusions: We found that morbidity in peritoneum, lung and ovary adversely affected prognosis of patients with advanced GC. Moreover, peritoneal morbidity preclude patients from receiving oncological treatment. [Table: see text]
e18056 Background: Cancer awareness months (CAM) are a health promotion tool that pursues to increase the public knowledge of a specific type of cancer. Awareness campaigns have benefited from the ease of access to the internet and social media. Analysis of internet search data has been used as an indirect tool to determine the information-seeking patterns of people and may reflect the impact of a campaign. We aim to determine national cancer awareness months’ impact on people’s internet search habits focusing on malignancies that have a specific awareness month in Mexico: breast, colorectal and prostate. Methods: We used Google Trends (GT) to obtain search volume indexes (SVIs), a term designed by GT scaled from 0 to 100 based on total searches during a specified period, of malignancies with an awareness month in Mexico from January 2008 to December 2018. Terms were consulted in Spanish: "cáncer de mama" (breast cancer), "cáncer de colon + cáncer colorrectal" (colon + colorectal cancer), "cáncer de próstata" (prostate cancer). We compared mean SVIs from each cancer awareness month to mean SVIs from the rest of the year using two-tailed two-independent sample T-tests. For prostate and colorectal, SVI’s were compared from the year its CAM was nationally instituted. Results: For breast cancer, mean SVI from October, its awareness month was 54.18 vs 12.09 for the rest of the year (p < 0.001). For colorectal cancer, mean SVI from its awareness month March, was 65.0 vs 55.5 for the rest of the year (p = 0.34). For prostate cancer, mean SVI from November, Mexican prostate awareness month, was 72.0 vs 35.52 for the rest of the year (p = 0.44). Conclusions: Google’s search volume for breast cancer was significantly higher in its awareness month compared to the rest of the year, which proves the impact of its CAM on modifying online activity. For more recently instituted CAMs on prostate and colorectal cancer, search volume didn’t change significantly between their CAM and the rest of the year. There are perhaps lessons to be learned from the breast cancer awareness month campaign which might usefully be adapted for the highest incident malignancies in Mexico.
590 Background: universal screening has been proposed as an alternative to clinical criteria for detection of Lynch syndrome (LS). Results of such policy have not been evaluated in mexican population with low incidence of colo-rectal cancer (CCR). Objective: to determine the proportion of patients tested by immunohistochemistry (IHC) for mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) and characterize subsequent molecular and clinical work up for abnormal results. Methods: we identified all consecutive cases of CCR during 2016 at Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico. We recorded clinical variables, IHC for mismatch repair (MMR) proteins and/or clinical genetics evaluation and molecular confirmation of LS if available. Results: universal screening policy was adopted by our institution in 2016. 209 CRC patients had an outpatient consultation. The median age at diagnosis was 59.8 years. 103 IHC for MMR proteins were done (49%) regardless of age at diagnosis and a family history of CRC. 36/103 (35%) IHC showed abnormal result meaning lack of expression of at least one of four MMR proteins: 26 MLH1, 7 MSH2, 10 MSH6 and 23 PMS2. 11/36 patients (30%) had a family history of CRC. 26/36 (72%) were evaluated by clinical genetics service. Of 26 MLH1 deficient patients, only one case was tested for BRAF mutation. 14/36 patients (39%) were tested by sequencing analysis: 7 MLH1, 5 MSH2, 1 MSH6, 1 PMS2. 2/14 patients were tested by MLPA assay given negative sequencing analysis. Germ-line mutations were identified in 7/36 patients (19%). All mutations were identified in patients with a clinical suspicion given strong family history of CRC. No identified mutations could be attributed to universal screening policy. Conclusions: during the first year of implementing universal screening for LS in CRC patients only half of the patients were screened by IHC. Despite MLH1/PMS2 deficiency was the most frequent abnormality, BRAF mutation analysis was not performed as recommended, given the lack of access to the test. A clinical suspicion of LS was a determinant driver for confirmatory molecular testing therefore limiting the usefulness of universal screening.
e15186 Background: NETs comprise a heterogeneous group of neoplasms regarding clinical behavior. Our aim was to identify clinical and pathological variables associated with survival in a mexican cohort. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of all gastroenteropancreatic(GEP)-NETs with histopathological confirmation evaluated at our Institution from January 2000 to December 2011. Relevant clinical and histopatholocical features were recorded. Overall survival (OS) was estimated using Kaplan Meier method and survival distributions were compared using the Log rank test. Results: 175 patients with GEP-NETs were identified in the study period. We excluded 35 patients with insulinomas and 40 patients with lesions amenable to endoscopic resection given 100% cancer specific survival. Therefore, 100 patients with GEP-NETs (61% gastrointestinal / 39% pancreatic) with malignant potential were analyzed: median age 53 y/o, 55% were male, 39% were localized, 4% had regional spread and 57% were metastatic at presentation. 35% of patients harbored functional tumors. 32% of patients showed isolated liver metastasis while 24% of patients showed hepatic and extrahepatic metastatic disease. 37% were NETs grade 1/2, 56% were neuroendocrine carcinomas and 6% were mixed neuroendocrine carcinoma / adenocarcinoma. Median OS was 79.6 months. Univariate analysis identified clinical stage (P=0.002), weight loss (P=0.000), jaundice at presentation (P=0.036), ECOG performance status (P=0.000), resection of primary tumor (P=0.000) and resection of metástasis (P=0.001) as significantly associated with survival. Multivariate analysis excluded resection of primary tumor only. Conclusions: In this mexican cohort, clinical factors were the most important determinants of prognosis.
617 Background: Ampullary cancer (AC) represents 0.2% of gastrointestinal cancers. Given the rarity of the disease, information regarding treatment strategies and outcomes derives from studies that include the different types of periampullary cancers, which constitute a heterogeneous group. Our aim was to describe the clinical characteristics, treatment modalities and outcomes in patients (pts) with true AC treated at our institution. Methods: A retrospective review of medical records of all consecutive pts with histological diagnosis of AC evaluated at our institution from Jan 2009-Dec 2019. Clinical, pathological and laboratory variables at diagnosis were recorded. Overall survival (OS) was estimated by Kaplan-Meier and compared with the Log-rank test. Statistical significance was determined at P<0.05. Results: 133 pts with AC were included. Median age was 62 yo (IQR 53-70), 51.9% were women. 25% had ampullary adenoma history. Symptoms at diagnosis: 89% jaundice, 63% weight loss and 56% abdominal pain. Median laboratory values were total bilirubin 1.7 mg/dL (0.7-5.1), albumin 3.7 g/dL (3.1-4.2), hemoglobin 12.6 g/dL (10.9-14.2), carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 34.7 U/mL (6.4-113.9) and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) 2.6 ng/mL (1.2-4.2). Most tumors were moderately differentiated (59%). Histologic subtypes of adenocarcinoma were available in 84 pts: intestinal 46.4%, pancreaticobiliary 39.3% and mixed 14.3%. Stage at diagnosis was localized (46%), locally advanced N+ (29%) and advanced (25%). For those with localized/locally advanced disease, 91% (91/100) underwent surgical resection, 25.3% (23/91) received adjuvant chemotherapy (ChT), 69.6% (16/23) received single agent and 30.4% (7/23) duplet. Pts who received adjuvant Cht presented N+ in 69.6%, moderate differentiation in 73.9%, intestinal 47.8% and pancreaticobiliary subtype 43.5%. In advanced setting, 63.6% (21/33) received palliative Cht, 66.7% received a duplet regimen. Median OS was 32.8 (22.9-42.8) months (mos). Median OS according to stage was 152.1, 28.1 and 10.2 mos for localized, locally advanced, and advanced, respectively (P<0.001). OS univariate analysis is shown in table. Conclusions: Most of pts presented with localized/locally advanced disease, were eligible to surgical resection and had a better survival. For those with N+ disease it is required to evaluate the role of adjuvant Cht. In the advanced setting, Cht improves prognosis.[Table: see text]
67 Background: in Mexico, Colorectal Cancer (CRC) is a leading cause of cancer death, yet population-based screening programs are lacking. In our center, a cohort was created to validate a risk calculator to detect advanced colorectal neoplasia, and to understand barriers to implement a CRC screening program. We aimed to determine frequency and reasons associated to rejection of CRC screening in our population. Methods: from August 2019 to March 2020 (early close owing to COVID-19 pandemic) asymptomatic individuals between 50 and 75 years-old with standard-risk for CRC, without previous screening for CRC, from the outpatient internal medicine clinic at a tertiary care center in Mexico City, received standardized information on the importance of CRC screening and were invited to perform both Fecal Immunochemical Test and a screening colonoscopy within a clinical study at no cost. Individuals who rejected participation were given a 10-item questionnaire to select reasons for refusal, as many items as applied. Here we present two groups: 1) individuals who refused to receive information and to perform screening studies, and 2) individuals who refused to participate after receiving information. Results: 162 patients were invited to participate, 77 (47%) refused: 48 rejected immediately (group 1) and provided 51 reasons, and 29 declined after having received standardized information about CRC screening (group 2) and provided 30 reasons. Demographics for 77 patients were: 54 (70.1%) women, median age 66 (IQR 58-71) years. Main reasons for rejection in both groups were: “I do not have time” in 24 (29.6%) times, “I am not interested” in 23 (28.4%) times, and “I am scared” in 14 (17.3%) times (Table). Conclusions: in our cohort, we identified that nearly half of the population invited to participate in a CRC screening program refused. Main reasons were lack of time, lack of interest and fear. This may translate poor understanding on the importance of measures to prevent CRC, and absence of education programs to recall its importance. In order to increment participation in CRC screening, education and awareness campaigns should be implemented.[Table: see text]
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.