Background: Extravasation, the inadvertent leakage of intravenous (IV) medication from the vein into the surrounding tissue, is a iatrogenic cause of patient injury. Extravasation has been reported to occur in 0.1% to 6.5% of hospital inpatients. The incidence may be higher among children because they have multiple risk factors, including small and fragile veins, decreased peripheral circulation, capillary leakage, and flexible subcutaneous tissue.

In this study, we found that ASP initiatives can be applied in neonatal populations to reduce inappropriate antimicrobial prescriptions, though a different approach may be needed among VLBW infants.

Based on evidence to date, adjunctive lacosamide is a treatment option to reduce seizure frequency in patients with refractory epilepsy and terminate seizures in patients with RSE. The safety information summary can be used to advise patients of potential adverse effects.

Levetiracetam is a broad-spectrum antiepileptic drug (AED) with a unique mechanism of action. Older AEDs can cause serious short- and long-term adverse drug reactions and complications, rendering them undesirable to use in pediatric patients. Characteristics that make levetiracetam a near-ideal AED include its broad spectrum of activity, good tolerability profile, and minimal drug-drug interactions. Clinical pharmacokinetic monitoring (CPM) is often recommended in pediatric patients for certain AEDs due to large interindividual pharmacokinetic differences and unpredictable drug disposition. Our objective was to determine whether monitoring levetiracetam concentrations is warranted for pediatric patients with epilepsy, using a previously published 9-step decision-making algorithm. A literature search of the MEDLINE (1946-August 2016), EMBASE (1974-August 2016), CENTRAL, and Google Scholar databases was performed to identify relevant English-language articles and answer the questions posed in the algorithm for levetiracetam CPM in pediatric epilepsies. Additional articles were identified from a manual bibliographic review of the relevant literature. We found that levetiracetam CPM met some criteria of the algorithm: levetiracetam is an appropriate adjunctive or monotherapy for pediatric patients with either focal or generalized seizures; it is readily measurable in plasma, with an appropriate degree of sensitivity, accuracy, and precision; it exhibits interindividual variation in pharmacokinetics; often, its pharmacologic effect cannot be easily measured; and the duration of therapy is expected to be long-term. However, important criteria not met include the following: there is no clear evidence for a concentration-response relationship for efficacy or toxicity; the proposed therapeutic range of 12-46 μg/mL is not well-defined and is generally considered as wide. Thus, clinical decision making is unlikely to be affected as a result of routine levetiracetam CPM. In general, routine CPM of levetiracetam cannot be recommended for pediatric patients with epilepsy. However, CPM may be beneficial in select cases, such as patients in whom noncompliance is suspected, those who have severe overdoses, those switching between product brands, or patients for whom an 'individual therapeutic concentration' is documented. Nonetheless, in the majority of pediatric patients with epilepsy, measurement of levetiracetam concentrations is not expected to yield a therapeutic benefit. Thus, clinical assessment and judgment, without measuring drug concentrations, remain the monitoring strategy of choice for levetiracetam therapy.

Background: Coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) frequently causes late-onset sepsis in preterm infants. Vancomycin is the first-line therapy, but the emergence of reduced vancomycin-susceptibility strains has resulted in linezolid use, of which long-term safety in preterm infants is unknown. Objective: Evaluate the association between linezolid exposure and neurodevelopmental impairment (NDI) or death at 18–21 months of corrected age, in preterm infants with CoNS sepsis. Methods: Multicentric retrospective cohort study comparing long-term outcomes of preterm infants exposed to linezolid versus other antistaphylococcal antimicrobials. We included infants ≤28 weeks’ gestational age (GA), with CoNS sepsis, admitted between January 2011 and June 2015 in 3 level-3 Canadian NICUs. Primary outcome was a composite of death or significant NDI (sNDI) at 18–21 months of corrected age. Secondary outcomes included NDI and individual components of the primary outcome. We assessed the relationship between linezolid exposure and outcomes using a multivariable logistic regression. Results: Of 274 infants included, 67 (24.4%) were exposed to linezolid. Median GA was 26 weeks and clinical characteristics were similar between groups. There was no difference in composite outcome of death or sNDI among the infants of both groups, but significantly more death by 18–21 months in the linezolid group (29.9% vs. 17.6%; P = 0.01). Conclusions: Linezolid exposure was not associated with composite outcome of death or sNDI at 18–21 months. The association between linezolid and death may be due to indication bias. Further studies are warranted.