Two experiments examined the relationships between the knowledge that another person has won in a gamble, the illusion of control and risk taking. Participants played a computer-simulated French roulette game individually. Before playing, some participants learnt that another person won a large amount of money. Results from a first experiment (n = 24) validated a causal model where the knowledge of another person's win increased the illusion of control, measured with betting times, expectancy and self-reports on scales, which in turn encourages risk taking. In the second experiment (n = 36), some participants were told the previous player acknowledged the win to be fortuitous. The suppression of the belief that the previous winner had himself exerted control over the outcome resulted in lower rates of risk-taking behaviors. This suggests that it was not the knowledge of another person's win in itself that increased risk taking, but rather, the belief that the other person had some control over the gamble's outcome. Theoretical implications for the study of social mechanisms involved in gambling behavior are discussed.
International audienceThe use of nanotechnology (devices/materials composed of parts less than 10nanometres) in the development of new products is rapidly expanding.Industrialists and decision-makers consider nanotechnology to be the nextindustrial revolution, but fear they risk the same resistance to nanotechnologythat their counterparts experienced with genetically modified organisms (GMOs).Although risk perception studies have shown that perceived risk of GMOs isquite high compared to that related to nanotechnology, no study to date hasexplored a potential direct social representation link between the two. Thepresent study aims to fill that gap by comparing the social representations ofnanotechnology and GMOs among a population of non-experts. This study wasconducted with 282 students in human and social sciences and natural sciences.Using a free association task with the inductive words ‘nanotechnology’ and‘GMO (genetically modified organism)’, we identified the existing social representationsof the two based on a structural approach. While the representation ofGMOs is objectified in the field of agriculture, objectification for nanotechnologyseems to still be lacking, although its possible objectification likely lies incomputing and robotics. Our calculation of the rate of similarity of associativewords with nanotechnology and GMOs indicated no present, direct link betweentheir social representations. We discuss the possible evolution of the socialrepresentation of nanotechnology over time
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.