Our understanding of the multiorgan pathology of cystic fibrosis (CF) has improved impressively during the last decades, but we still lack a full comprehension of the disease progression. Animal models have greatly contributed to the elucidation of specific mechanisms involved in CF pathophysiology and the development of new therapies. Soon after the cloning of the CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene in 1989, the first mouse model was generated and this model has dominated in vivo CF research ever since. Nonetheless, the failure of murine models to mirror human disease severity in the pancreas and lung has led to the generation of larger animal models such as pigs and ferrets. The following review presents and discusses data from the current animal models used in CF research.
The unphosphorylated regulatory (R) domain of the Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane conductance Regulator (CFTR) is often viewed as an inhibitor that is released by phosphorylation. To test this notion, we studied domain interactions using CFTR channels assembled from three polypeptides. Nucleotides encoding the R domain (aa 635-836) were replaced with an internal ribosome entry sequence so that amino-and carboxyl-terminal half-molecules would be translated from the same mRNA transcript. Although only core glycosylation was detected on SplitDR, biotinylation, immunostaining, and functional studies clearly demonstrated its trafficking to the plasma membrane. SplitDR generated a constitutive halide permeability, which became responsive to cAMP when the missing R domain was coexpressed. Each half-molecule was coprecipitated by antibody against the other half. Contrary to expectations, GST-R domain was pulled down only if prephosphorylated by protein kinase A, and coexpressed R domain was precipitated with SplitDR much more efficiently when cells were stimulated with cAMP. These results indicate that phosphorylation regulates CFTR by promoting association of the R domain with other domains rather than by causing its dissociation from an inhibitory site.
Protein kinase C (PKC) phosphorylation stimulates the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) channel and enhances its activation by protein kinase A (PKA) through mechanisms that remain poorly understood. We have examined the effects of mutating consensus sequences for PKC phosphorylation and report here evidence for both stimulatory and inhibitory sites. Sequences were mutated in subsets and the mutants characterized by patch clamping. Activation of a 4CA mutant (S707A͞S790A͞T791A͞S809A) by PKA was similar to that of wild-type CFTR and was enhanced by PKC, whereas responses of 3CA (T582A͞T604A͞S641A) and 2CA (T682A͞ S686A) channels to PKA were both drastically reduced (>90%). When each mutation in the 3CA and 2CA constructs was studied individually in a wild-type background, T582, T604, and S686 were found to be essential for PKA activation. Responses were restored when these three residues were reintroduced simultaneously into a 9CA mutant lacking all nine PKC consensus sequences (R6CA revertant); however, PKC phosphorylation was not required for this rescue. Nevertheless, two of the sites (T604 and S686) were phosphorylated in vitro, and PKC alone partially activated wild-type CFTR, the 4CA mutant, and the point mutants T582A and T604A, but not S686A channels, indicating that PKC does act at S686. The region encompassing S641 and T682 is inhibitory, because S641A enhanced activation by PKA, and T682A channels had 4-fold larger responses to PKC compared to wild-type channels. These results identify functionally important PKC consensus sequences on CFTR and will facilitate studies of its convergent regulation by PKC and PKA.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.