This paper proposes a maximum-likelihood approach to jointly estimate marginal conditional quantiles of multivariate response variables in a linear regression framework.We consider a slight reparameterization of the Multivariate Asymmetric Laplace distribution proposed by Kotz et al (2001) and exploit its location-scale mixture representation to implement a new EM algorithm for estimating model parameters. The idea is to extend the link between the Asymmetric Laplace distribution and the well-known univariate quantile regression model to a multivariate context, i.e. when a multivariate dependent variable is concerned. The approach accounts for association among multiple responses and study how the relationship between responses and explanatory variables can vary across different quantiles of the marginal conditional distribution of the responses. A penalized version of the EM algorithm is also presented to tackle the problem of variable selection. The validity of our approach is analyzed in a simulation study, where we also provide evidence on the efficiency gain of the proposed method compared to estimation obtained by separate univariate quantile regressions. A real data application is finally proposed to study the main determinants of financial distress in a sample of Italian firms.

We propose a methodology for estimating and testing beta-pricing models when a large number of assets is available for investment but the number of time-series observations is fixed. We first consider the case of correctly specified models with constant risk premia, and then extend our framework to deal with time-varying risk premia, potentially misspecified models, firm characteristics, and unbalanced panels. We show that our large cross-sectional framework poses a serious challenge to common empirical findings regarding the validity of beta-pricing models. In the context of pricing models with Fama-French factors, firm characteristics are found to explain a much larger proportion of variation in estimated expected returns than betas. Authors have furnished an Internet Appendix, which is available on the Oxford University Press Web site next to the link to the final published paper online.

University evaluation is a topic of increasing concern in Italy as well as in other countries. In empirical analysis, university activities and performances are generally measured by means of indicator variables, summarizing the available information under different perspectives. In this paper, we argue that the evaluation process is a complex issue that can not be addressed by a simple descriptive approach and thus association between indicators and similarities among the observed universities should be accounted for. Particularly, we examine faculty-level data collected from different sources, covering 55 Italian Economics faculties in the academic year 2009/2010. Making use of a clustering framework, we introduce a biclustering model that accounts for both homogeneity/heterogeneity among faculties and correlations between indicators.Our results show that there are two substantial different performances between universities which can be strictly related to the nature of the institutions, namely the Private and Public profiles . Each of the two groups has its own peculiar features and its own group-specific list of priorities, strengths and weaknesses. Thus, we suggest that caution should be used in interpreting standard university rankings as they generally * Dipartimento di Scienze Statistiche, Sapienza Università di Roma, Roma, Italy † Dipartimento di Scienze Statistiche, Sapienza Università di Roma, Roma, Italy ‡ Southampton Statistical Sciences Research Institute, Southampton, UK 1 do not account for the complex structure of the data.