A remote cerebellar hemorrhage (RCH) is a spontaneous bleeding in the posterior fossa, which may rarely occurs as a complication of supratentorial procedures, and it shows a typical bleeding pattern defined "the zebra sign." However, its pathophysiology still remains unknown. We performed a comprehensive review collecting all cases of RCH after supratentorial craniotomies reported in literature in order to identify the most frequently associated procedures and the possible risk factors. We assessed percentages of incidence and 95 % confidence intervals of all demographic, neuroradiological, and clinical features of the patients. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to evaluate their association with outcome. We included 49 articles reporting 209 patients with a mean age of 49.09 ± 17.07 years and a male/female ratio 130/77. A RCH was more frequently reported as a complication of supratentorial craniotomies for intracranial aneurysms, tumors debulking, and lobectomies. In the majority of cases, RCH occurrence was associated with impairment of consciousness, although some patients remained asymptomatic or showed only slight cerebellar signs. Coagulation disorders, perioperative cerebrospinal fluid drainage, hypertension, and seizures were the most frequently reported risk factors. Zebra sign was the most common bleeding pattern, being observed in about 65 % out of the cases, followed by parenchymal hematoma and mixed hemorrhage in similar percentages. A multivariate analysis showed that symptomatic onset and intake of antiplatelets/anticoagulants within a week from surgery were independent predictors of poor outcome. However, about 75 % out of patients showed a good outcome and a RCH often appeared as a benign and self-limiting condition, which usually did not require surgical treatment, but only prolonged clinical surveillance, unless in the event of the occurrence of complications.
A remote cerebellar hemorrhage (RCH) is a spontaneous bleeding in the posterior fossa, which can be rarely observed as a complication of spine surgery. As well as for RCH reported after supratentorial procedures, it shows a characteristic bleeding pattern defined "zebra sign". Nowadays, RCH pathophysiology still remains unknown. We performed a comprehensive review, collecting all cases of RCH after spine surgery reported in literature in order to identify the procedures most frequently associated with RCH and the possible risk factors. We assessed percentages of incidence and 95 % confidence interval of all demographic, neuroradiological, and clinical features. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to evaluate their association with outcome. We included 44 articles reporting 57 patients with mean age of 57.6 ± 13.9 years and a male/female ratio of 23/34. A RCH was more frequently reported as a complication of decompressive procedures for spinal canal stenosis, particularly when associated with instrumented fusion, followed by spinal tumor debulking and disc herniation removal. In the majority of cases, RCH occurrence was characterized by progressive impairment of consciousness, whereas some patients complained non-specific symptoms. Coagulation disorders, hypertension, and placement of postoperative subfascial drainages were the most frequently reported risk factors. The occurrence of intraoperative dural lesions was described in about 93 % of patients. Zebra sign was the most common bleeding pattern (about 43 % of cases) followed by parenchymal hematoma (37.5 %) and mixed hemorrhage (about 20 %). Impairment of consciousness at clinical onset and intake of anticoagulants/antiplatelets appeared associated with poor outcome at univariate analysis. However, more than 75 % of patients showed a good outcome and a RCH often appeared as a benign and self-limiting condition, which usually did not require surgical treatment, but only prolonged clinical surveillance, unless of the occurrence of complications.
SUMMARY Disregarding the widely used division of skull base into anterior and lateral, since the skull base should be conceived as a single anatomic structure, it was to our convenience to group all those approaches that run from the antero-lateral, pure lateral and postero-lateral side of the skull base as “Surgery of the lateral skull base”. “50 years of endeavour” points to the great effort which has been made over the last decades, when more and more difficult surgeries were performed by reducing morbidity. The principle of lateral skull base surgery, “remove skull base bone to approach the base itself and the adjacent sites of the endo-esocranium”, was then combined with function preservation and with tailoring surgery to the pathology. The concept that histology dictates the extent of resection, balancing the intrinsic morbidity of each approach was the object of the first section of the present report. The main surgical approaches were described in the second section and were conceived not as a step-by-step description of technique, but as the highlighthening of the surgical principles. The third section was centered on open issues related to the tumor and its treatment. The topic of vestibular schwannoma was investigated with the current debate on observation, hearing preservation surgery, hearing rehabilitation, radiotherapy and the recent efforts to detect biological markers able to predict tumor growth. Jugular foramen paragangliomas were treated in the frame of radical or partial surgery, radiotherapy, partial “tailored” surgery and observation. Surgery on meningioma was debated from the point of view of the neurosurgeon and of the otologist. Endolymphatic sac tumors and malignant tumors of the external auditory canal were also treated, as well as chordomas, chondrosarcomas and petrous bone cholesteatomas. Finally, the fourth section focused on free-choice topics which were assigned to aknowledged experts. The aim of this work was attempting to report the state of the art of the lateral skull base surgery after 50 years of hard work and, above all, to raise questions on those issues which still need an answer, as to allow progress in knowledge through sharing of various experiences. At the end of the reading, if more doubts remain rather than certainties, the aim of this work will probably be achieved.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.