Introduction: Infections of the sternoclavicular joint (SCJ) account for less than 1% of all joint infections. There are no standardized diagnostic and therapeutic algorithms defined in literature. This study intended to report the risk factors, the bacterial spectrum, the extent and localization and the clinical outcome of SCJ infections. Patients and methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical charts of 13 patients (8 men, five women, mean age 37.6 years) with SCJ infections between Januray 1st 2008 and October 30th 2015 for clinical parameters and radiological studies. All patients were interviewed during their follow-up along with clinical examination and assessing the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire (DASH). Results: Nine patients presented with local chest pain and swelling; in 4 patients, the prevalent symptom was pain without local signs of inflammation. Full blood count revealed a mean leukocytosis of 15 Â 10 9 L and a mean CRP of 21.0 mg/dl. Approximately 61.5% reported known diabetes mellitus. 10 patients presented an involvement of surrounding structures. All patients received a preoperativ CT scan. Each patient was treated via SCJ resection without intraoperative complications. Primary wound closure was possible in all cases. The mean follow-up was 95 days. Wound culture revealed Staphylococcus aureus in all patients. Pathological examination affirmed acute osteomyelitis in 7 patients. Four patients required the intensive care of which 2 patients died from septic shock. Recurrent infection was encountered in 3 patients who underwent revision surgery. Mean DASH Score was 18.7. Conclusion: CT should be routinely obtained to recognize the possible extends to the surrounding structures. SCJ resection can result in satisfactory clinical results and should be considered in cases of extended infections including the surrounding structures. Empiric antibiotic coverage should contain cephalosporin or extended-spectrum penicillin. Inappropriate or less-invasive surgical procedures may cause recurrencent infections, especially in cases of osteomyelitis.

BackgroundFractures of the humeral shaft represent 2–4% of all fractures. Fractures of the humerus have traditionally been approached posteriorly for open reduction and internal fixation. Reports of treating midshaft fractures with an open anterolateral approach and anterior plating are limited. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a series of humeral shaft fractures treated with plate osteosynthesis regarding the effect of the approach and plate location on the healing rate and occurrence of complications.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective chart review of patients aged over 18 years with humeral midshaft fractures treated with anterior or posterior plate fixation. Selection of the approach to the humerus was based on the particular pattern of injury and soft tissue involvement. The minimum follow-up duration was set at six months. The outcomes included the rate of union, primary nerve palsy recovery, secondary nerve damage, infection and revision surgery.ResultsBetween 2006 and 2014, 58 patients (mean age, 59.9; range, 19–97 years) with humeral midshaft fractures were treated with anterior (n = 33) or posterior (n = 25) plate fixation. After a mean follow-up duration of 34 months, 57 of 58 fractures achieved union after index procedure. Twelve fractures were associated with primary radial nerve palsy. Ten of the twelve patients with primary radial palsy recovered completely within six months after the index surgery. In total, one patient developed secondary palsy after anterior plating, and three patients developed secondary palsy after posterior plating. No significant difference in the healing rate (p = 0.4), primary nerve palsy recovery rate (p = 0.6) or prevalence of secondary nerve palsy (p = 0.4) was found between the two clinical groups. No cases of infection after plate fixation were documented.ConclusionsOpen reduction and internal fixation using an anterior approach with plate fixation provides a safe alternative to posterior plating in the treatment of humeral shaft fractures. An anterior approach allows supine positioning of the patient and yields union and complication rates comparable to those of a posterior approach with plate fixation for the treatment of humeral shaft fractures.

ObjectiveFractures of the capitellum are rare injuries but are often more complex and of a greater extent than assumed from conventional radiographs. Classification is usually based on their extension in relation to the trochlea the trochlea and on the number of fragments. Information on associated injuries is limited and only reported in small case series. The aim of this retrospective study was to report on our experience with capitellar fractures and their associated injuries.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed all patients treated for fractures of the capitellum humeri at our institute between 2005 and 2017. Fractures were classified according to the Bryan–Morrey and the Dubberley classification and analyzed for their associated injuries depending on the fracture type using the chi-squared test.ResultsA total of 27 capitellar fractures were treated at our institute between 2005 and 2017. The median age of the patients was 57 years (range, 4–78) and they were all treated operatively. Associated injuries of the elbow were found in 12 cases (ten radial head fractures, two elbow dislocations, two tears of the radial collateral ligament). The injury mechanism was known for 26 patients (four fell on their outstretched arm, 19 suffered a direct blow to their elbow, two had a traffic accident).ConclusionThe incidence of radial head fractures is high in patients with capitellar fractures. Patients suffering a fracture of the capitellum humeri should be thoroughly examined for such associated injuries since a missed diagnosis can lead to poor outcomes.

Septic nonunion of the pilon region with ankle joint infection is challenging for orthopedic surgeons to treat and is associated with a high risk of limb loss. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of bone transport for ankle arthrodesis in salvaging the limp after septic ankle destruction of the pilon region. We conducted a single-center, retrospective study including 21 patients treated for septic pilon nonunion with accompanying septic ankle destruction via Ilizarov bone transport between 2004 and 2018. In all cases, the complete excision of the nonunion and the resection of the ankle joint were carried out, followed by treating the bone and joint defect with a bone transport into the ankle arthrodesis. In 12/21 patients an additional flap transfer was required due to an accompanying soft tissue lesion. The overall healing and failure rate, final alignment and complications were recorded by the patients’ medical files. The bone-related and functional results were evaluated according to the Association for the Study and Application of Methods of Ilizarov (ASAMI) scoring system and a modified American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scale. After a mean follow-up of 30.9 ± 15.7 months (range 12–63 months), complete bone and soft tissue healing occurred in 18/21 patients (85.7%). The patients had excellent (5), good (7), fair (4), and poor (3) results based on the ASAMI functional score. Regarding bone stock, 6 patients had excellent, 7 good, and 6 fair results. The modified AOFAS score reached 60.6 ± 18 points (range, 29–86). In total, 33 minor complications and 28 major complications occurred during the study period. In 2 cases, a proximal lower leg amputation was performed due to a persistent infection and free flap necrosis with a large soft tissue defect, whereas in one case, persistent nonunion on the docking side was treated with a carbon orthosis because the patient refused to undergo an additional surgery. Bone transport for ankle arthrodesis offers the possibility of limb salvage after septic ankle destruction of the pilon region, with acceptable bony and functional results. However, a high number of complications and surgical revisions are associated with the treatment of this severe complication after pilon fracture.