No abstract

Aquaculture is a fast-growing animal food sector, and freshwater fish farming is particularly common in Central and Eastern Europe. As the biodiversity of fishery ponds is changed toward fulfilling the industrial needs, precautions should be taken to keep the system sustainable and protect the adjacent environment from possible damage. Due to risk of infectious diseases, antibiotics are used in aquaculture production systems. The constant exposure to antimicrobials can contribute to the rise of antibiotic resistance in aquaculture products and the adjacent ecosystems, with possibility of dissemination to the wider environment as well as between animals and humans. Even though previous studies have found antibiotic resistance genes in the sediments and water of farming ponds, the tendency and direction of spreading is not clear yet. The objective of this project was to evaluate the influence of intensive fish farming on the condition of water bodies used for the aquaculture and the environment, concentrating on the impact of the aquaculture on the surrounding water ecosystems as well as the possibility of transferring the pollutants and antibiotic resistance genes to both environment and the human hosts. Combined measurement of antibiotic and heavy metal contamination, toxicity assessment, microorganism diversity, and the detection of common antibiotic resistance genes was performed in the sediments of one fishery farm ponds as well as sampling points upstream and downstream. All the tested sediment samples did not show significantly elevated heavy metal concentrations and no substantial veterinary antibiotic pollution. From the antibiotic resistance genes tested, the presence of aminoglycoside and β-lactam resistance determinants as well as the presence of integrons could be of concern for the possibility of transfer to humans. However, despite the lack of heavy metal and antibiotic pollution, the sediments showed toxicity, the cause of which should be explored more.

No abstract

No abstract

One of the most significant elements in the environment is arsenic (As). It is a hazardous metalloid that causes contamination of soil and water supplies as a result of numerous anthropogenic and natural sources. This pollution has detrimental impacts on human health and the ecosystem, making it crucial to monitor and control. The release of As from minerals into the soil and groundwater depends on the kind of mineral, pH, and redox conditions. As is typically found in two forms, trivalent arsenic (As3+, arsenite) and pentavalent arsenic (As5+, arsenate), both of which are inorganic and extremely deadly. When it comes to toxicity, arsenite is more dangerous than arsenate. Many people have been affected by As poisoning, due to exposure to As through water and food. Nowadays, accurate, fast measurement of As in the field remains a technical challenge; however, the X-ray fluorescence method is considered the most reliable, cost effective and capable of measuring a wide spectrum of metals. Health risk assessment is a crucial parameter to estimate the health hazards of the As molecule. The risk assessment approach proposed by the USEPA is common and widely used, amongst others. On the numerous health risk assessment models/frameworks used to foresee the carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic health impacts brought on by As-contaminated water, little information is currently accessible. This discussion also emphasizes the need for more study on the risks to human health posed by specific As species (both organic and inorganic) found in As-contaminated water.