The appearance of flowing fluid has been evaluated in several clinical situations using a flow phantom, computer simulation, and clinical magnetic resonance (MR) images. Unsaturated protons just entering the imaging volume can emit a strong signal relative to the partially saturated adjacent tissue ("flow-related enhancement"). Slow laminar flow in veins can be distinguished on the basis of a stronger second echo due to rephasing effects ("even echo rephasing"). Synchronization of the cardiac cycle and the MR pulsing sequence produces increased signal in sections acquired during diastole ("diastolic pseudogating"). Intraluminal signal is shown to decrease as velocity is increased ("high velocity signal loss"). Onset of turbulence causes further loss of signal. Direction of flow oblique to the imaging plane can be predicted on the basis of decreased upstream and increased downstream signal.
Magnetic resonance imaging (MR) (0.35 T) and computed tomography (CT) were compared in 400 consecutive patients with suspected disease of the brain and cervical spinal cord. Of 325 positive diagnoses, MR detected abnormality while CT was normal in 93; MR was more specific in 68; MR and CT gave equivalent information in 129; CT was more specific in 32; and CT was positive while MR was normal in 3. MR was superior to CT in detection of multiple sclerosis, subcortical arteriosclerotic encephalopathy, posterior fossa infarcts and tumors, small extra-axial fluid collections, and cervical syringomyelia. CT was preferable in evaluation of meningiomas and separation of tumor from edema. Using available sequence parameters, MR missed 3 1-cm calcified meningiomas which were clearly seen on CT. CT takes less time and may be preferable in patients with acute trauma as well as very young or elderly individuals. Thus the two studies should be considered complementary.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.