Purpose Laparoscopy has become the standard surgical approach to surgery for gastrooesophageal refl ux disease (GERD) and hiatal hernia repair with excellent long-term results and high patient satisfaction. However several studies have shown that hiatal hernia repair, especially large hiatus are associated with high recurrence rate. Mesh reinforcement has been proposed for repair of large hiatus hernia. The objective of this study was to evaluate the role of mesh cruroplasty in management of large hiatus hernia (> 5 cm).Methods Between February 2002 to December 2007, 73 patients (28 men and 45 women) who underwent laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair with mesh cruroplasty were included in our study. Mesh reinforcement (cruroplasty) was used for repair of large hiatus hernia (>5 cms hernial defect). Mean age was 50.4 years (range 30-72 years). Follow up included barium swallow of patients at 3 months and yearly thereafter.Results Seventy-three patients underwent mesh cruroplasty for large hiatus hernia. We were able to adequately mobilise the oesophagus to achieve an intra-abdominal length of at least 3 cm in all patients. Intraoperative complication rate was 8.21% (6/73), intraoperative complications included pleural tear, bleeding from splenic capsule laceration and short gastric vessels. Postoperative complication rate was 4.1% (3/73), which included complete dyspahgia, atelactasis and pneumonia. Mean duration of hospitalisation was 3.5 days (range 3-9 days). Five patients (5/73) were lost to follow up. Four patients (5.8%) developed recurrence on routine follow up. No mesh related complications were noted on long-term follow up period. Mean follow up period was 3.2 years (range 5 months-6 years). ConclusionOur data supports the use of mesh in hiatal hernia repair, especially in large hiatus hernia as it leads to low recurrence rates. Longer follow up and more randomised controlled trials are needed to establish laparoscopic mesh cruroplasty as standard technique for large hiatal hernia repair.

Repair of large ventral hernia is a challenge for even experienced surgeons, as there are large defects with large contents, often with loss of domain. The large defects were bridged by various plastic surgical procedures like myofascial flaps or free flaps with high recurrences and complications. More often, the bridging was done with artificial prosthesis, leaving the defects open. This was accomplished by either open surgery (onlay, inlay, sublay or underlay) or laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay meshes (IPOMs). However, non-closure of the midline had adverse effects on postural maintenance, respiration, micturition, defecation and biomechanical properties, which have a profound impact on the patients' overall physical capacity and quality of life. Component separation technique (CST) is a novel answer to the closure of midline with live, active tissues with or without the use of additional prosthesis. Though this technique was originally described in 1990, it has undergone lots of modifications like perforator preserving CST, endoscopic technique and posterior component separation. So, we present a series of 22 patients with large ventral hernia repaired using various options of component separation technique in the last 3 years.

No abstract