In their paper, the authors studied sequence of development and importance of leadership, military management as the basis of effective management of the military organization. The emphasis was placed on the managerial qualities of a modern military commander as a leader of a military organization. Leading talent for military commanders was announced on the example of Sun Tsu and Alexander Suvorov. It is stated that charismatic leadership as a special type of leadership is based neither merely on the law and the constitution as in legitimate leadership, nor on tradition as in traditional leadership, but solely on the special talent of a charismatic leader capable of enchanting and leading a mass of people. The authors suggested three groups of elements of the leader's image in relation to the political leader are outlined, namely, personal characteristics – physical, psycho-physiological features, his character, type of personality, individual style of decision making; social characteristics – the status of a leader associated with the official position, as well as related to the origin, wealth, etc. in the paper it is singled out the main psychological and pedagogical properties of the military commander and his functions in modern military management.
Abstract. Personality assessments are administered for a variety of purposes
among different groups of qualified personnel in a wide range of practice settings,
including the educational and scientific fields. There is strong evidence of the
usefulness of specific personality tests in these settings, especially using a multiparameter assessment system. However, there are no unified guidelines that form
the basis for current personality assessment practice. The absence of these guidelines
may contribute to increased inconsistencies in the formation of work teams for
research projects by research managers.
The aim of the article is to form the main methods for assessing the results
of scientific activity of scientific teams, used in Ukraine, with identifying their
advantages and disadvantages. Adequate assessment of the effectiveness of
scientific teams and individual scientists is a key task for building a rating of
both the scientist himself and the scientific institution in which he has
affiliation.
The methodology of the research is based on the principle of systematicity, a
comparative analysis of evaluation criteria has been carried out.
Scientific novelty. The article considers the principles, methods and indicators
of scientometric evaluation of information processes in science and evaluation
of publication activity of individuals and scientific teams; analyzes the main
criteria for assessing the prospects of scientific directions, evaluation of the
effectiveness of scientific organizations, their departments and individual
employees; shows the means of accounting additional information; proposes
criteria for evaluating the work of scientific teams and methods of assessing
each of the criteria.
Conclusions. It has been determined that the transition to specific quantitative
assessments will require a clearer formalization of the above criteria, as well as
the formation of unambiguous algorithms for their application. A proposal has
been made to evaluate the work of a scientific unit as a scientific team, the
composition of which can be interdepartmental or international, and possible criteria
for evaluating its work have been considered. A proposal has been made to introduce
different scales of evaluation for theoretical and applied areas of science. This
approach is a generalization of the global and domestic experience of evaluating
the work of scientific teams.
Keywords: research team, evaluation criteria, scientometrics, citation index,
h-index, expertise.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.