Key Points• A currently marketed rFVIII product is associated with a higher risk of inhibitor development in boys with severe hemophilia A.• This result, validated by extensive sensitivity analyses, confirms a recently published study and cannot be explained by identified biases.Six recombinant factor VIII (rFVIII) products have been marketed worldwide. In 2013, the Research of Determinants of Inhibitor Development (RODIN) study group reported an unexpectedly high risk of inhibitor development with a second-generation full-length rFVIII (Product D) in previously untreated patients (PUPs) with severe hemophilia A (HA). In 1994, French public health authorities established a prospective cohort to monitor hemophilia treatment safety. A PUP subgroup was designed to investigate inhibitor risk factors. We analyzed this subcohort in view of the RODIN findings. After excluding 50 patients who participated in the RODIN study, the primary analysis focused on 303 boys with severe HA first treated with a rFVIII product. A clinically significant inhibitor was detected in 114 boys (37.6%). The inhibitor incidence was higher with Product D vs the most widely used rFVIII product (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.55; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.97-2.49). Similar results were found for high-titer inhibitors and in 10 sensitivity analyses. No heterogeneity was observed between RODIN and our results. Combined aHRs were 1.58 (95% CI, 1.17-2.14) for all inhibitors and 1.70 (95% CI, 1.15-2.52) for high-titer inhibitors. Our results confirm the higher immunogenicity of Product D vs other rFVIII products in PUPs with severe HA. (Blood. 2014;124(23):3398-3408)

) were treated with the concentrate as the only therapy, except for clinical situations requiring a priming dose of FVIII to rapidly correct an intrinsic coagulation defect. A total of 139 spontaneous bleeding episodes were treated; only 53 (38%) needed a concomitant FVIII dose. Outcome was excellent or good in 89% of the episodes. Forty-four patients underwent 108 surgical or invasive procedures. Outcome was excellent or good in 95 scheduled procedures (only VWF was infused) and 13 emergency procedures (a priming FVIII dose was co-administered with the first VWF infusion). There were no thrombotic complications and none of the 18 patients with type 3 VWD developed anti-VWF or anti-FVIII antibodies. Conclusions. This concentrate safely and effectively provides hemostasis in patients with clinically severe VWD.

Because several F8 neighbouring genes are associated with other pathologies such as XLID and cardiovascular disease, all HA patients where complex Xq28 rearrangement was suspected should be referred to a geneticist for possible utility of a pangenomic study. Such investigation should be carefully considered in genetic counselling in female carriers to assess the risk of transmitting severe HA with a "contiguous gene syndrome".

SummaryLiver histology is important for prognosis and treatment strategy in patients with hepatitis C. We report a 10-year experience of transjugular liver biopsy (TJLB) in patients with haemophilia and other congenital bleeding disorders (CBD) in terms of safety, efficiency and therapeutic consequences. TJLB was proposed to patients who were regularly followed for CBD, and were hepatitis C virus (HCV) positive by polymerase chain reaction. Patients with inhibitors or who were human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) positive with CD4 cells <0AE2 · 10 9 /l or with evidence of liver failure were excluded. TJLB was performed during a short hospitalization with factor replacement.

No abstract

The physical condition of severe haemophilia and the impact of advances in replacement therapy have been much studied, but little work has been done on patients who developed inhibitors. The 'Statut Orthopédique des Patients Hémophiles avec Inhibiteur' study was conducted in France in order to assess the orthopaedic status and quality of life of such patients, and the cost of their medical management. Fifty haemophiliacs aged 12-63 years with a history of high-responder inhibitors were included. Clinical assessment showed that only 12% of the patients had a nil pain score and 2% a nil clinical score, as per Gilbert scale. The mean clinical score was significantly higher in patients over 35 years of age than in younger ones. However, younger patients appeared to have a more impaired orthopaedic status than young haemophiliacs without inhibitors of similar age in previous published cohorts. Surprisingly, older haemophiliacs tended to have the best mental quality of life, contrasting with their highly impaired orthopaedic condition and physical quality of life. The mean cost of clinical resources consumed during the year preceding enrolment was Euro 268 999, 99% of which was related to clotting factor. Marked between-patient differences in cost were noted. Our study suggests that the management of haemophiliacs with inhibitors should be improved in order to prevent haemophilic arthropathy to an extent similar to that of patients without inhibitors. Cost-benefit assessment of any therapeutic strategy should always be combined with quality-of-life evaluation.

No abstract

Life expectancy for patients with haemophilia (PWH) has significantly increased in the last decades, due to improvement of clotting factor replacement therapy. However, despite a lower cardiovascular mortality rate and contrasting prevalence for non-fatal ischaemic heart disease (IHD), cardiovascular diseases are increasing in PWH. The prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors in PWH is as prevalent as in the general population, whereas an increased risk of hypertension has been observed in some studies. Furthermore, PWH are not protected against atherosclerosis. Coronary artery disease treatment is extremely challenging in PWH. Two 'institutional' guidelines for the management of IHD in PWH have been published. Since these recommendations, the use of new drugs such as prasugrel, ticagrelor, bivalirudin, new oral anticoagulants and new drug-eluting stents have been recommended in the general population but should be evaluated in PWH. Some questions arise: which trough level during long-term single or dual antiplatelet treatment (DAT) is really needed? The clinical role of platelet testing remains ill defined but may be considered in selected patients. A multidisciplinary approach is necessary for the management of IHD in PWH in order to treat the patient as any patient according to the cardiological guidelines during the acute phase, and long-term management should be discussed.