Thermolysis of [(Cp*RuCO) 2 B 2 H 6 ] (1; Cp* = η 5 -C 5 Me 5 ) with [Ru 3 (CO) 12 ] yielded the trimetallaborane [(Cp*RuCO) 3 (μ 3 -H)BH] (2) and a number of homometallic boride clusters: [Cp * RuCO{Ru(CO) 3 } 4 B] (3 ), [ ( C p * R u ) 2 { R u 2 ( C O ) 8 } B H ] ( 4 ) , a n d [(Cp*Ru) 2 {Ru 4 (CO) 12 }BH] (5). Compound 2 is isoelectronic and isostructural with the triply bridged borylene compounds [(μ 3 -BH)(Cp*RuCO) 2 (μ-CO){Fe(CO) 3 }] (6) and [(μ 3 -BH)(Cp*RuCO) 2 (μ-H)(μ-CO){Mn(CO) 3 }] (7), where the [μ 3 -BH] moiety occupies the apical position. To test if compound 2 undergoes hydroboration reactions with alkynes, as observed with 6, we performed the reaction of 2 with the same set of alkynes under photolytic conditions. However, neither 2 nor 7 undergoes hydroboration to yield a vinyl−borylene complex. On the other hand, thermolysis of 6 with trimethylsilylethylene yielded the novel diruthenacarborane [1,1,7,7,7-(CO) 5 -2,3-(Cp*) 2 -μ-2,3-(CO)-μ 3 -1,2,3-(CO)-5-(SiMe 3 )-pileo-1,7,2,3,4,5-Fe 2 Ru 2 C 2 BH] ( 8). The solid-state X-ray diffraction results suggest that 8 exhibits a pentagonal -bipyramidal geometry with one additional CO capping one of its faces. Cluster 3 is a boride cluster where boron is in the interstitial position of a square-pyramidal geometry, whereas compound 4 can be described as a tetraruthenium boride in which the Ru 4 butterfly skeleton has an interstitial boron atom. Electronic structure calculations of compound 2 employing density functional theory (DFT) generate geometries in agreement with the structure determinations. The existence of a large HOMO−LUMO gap in 2 is in agreement with its high stability. Bonding patterns in the structure have been analyzed on the grounds of DFT calculations. Furthermore, the B3LYP-computed 11 B and 1 H chemical shifts for compound 2 precisely follow the experimentally measured values. All the compounds have been characterized by IR and 1 H, 11 B, and 13 C NMR spectroscopy, and the geometries of the structures were unambiguously established by crystallographic analyses of 2−4 and 8.