Minimally invasive treatment for small renal cell carcinoma (RCC) can be necessary in selected patients and, anyway, is desirable. In situ ablation techniques, including RFA, have been developed. The aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility, safety and short-term local effectiveness of percutaneous US-guided RFA in a small series, as well as mid-term patient outcome. Thirteen patients with a total of 18 tumors (17 small lesions, 35 mm in size or less, and a larger one, 75 mm in size) underwent 19 RFA sessions. Seven patients had a solitary kidney, and three suffered from VHL disease, too. We treated four lesions in a patient with a bilateral tumor. In another patient, three lesions were ablated. Seventeen tumors were RCC; one was a metastasis from lung cancer. Eight lesions were parenchymal, six exophytic, two parenchymal/exophytic, one parenchymal/central and one central. A monopolar RF system with multitined expandable electrode needles was used. The 35-mm lesion underwent two sessions; the 75-mm lesion was treated with transcatheter arterial embolization before RFA. Tumors with complete loss of contrast enhancement at short-term CT (or MR) were considered successfully treated. Percutaneous US-guided RFA was always feasible without major complications. The success rate after a single treatment in tumors less than 35 mm in size was 88.2% (15/17) and rose to 94.1% (16/17) after the second treatment of the largest lesion. After a mean 14-month follow-up, no successfully treated lesions recurred locally. Only the patient with metastasis from lung cancer died from disease progression in a further location, while all other patients are alive, with renal function still sufficient to avoid dialysis. US guidance allows an easy and safe percutaneous approach for RFA of small non-parahilar RCC. The treatment is locally effective and can be proposed as a minimally invasive therapy for patients with contraindications to surgery or to those expressing an informed consent. Based on the results of this study and of the literature, mid-term results on the clinical usefulness are very encouraging.

Our results demonstrate the limited usefulness of chest radiography in the diagnosis of ABPA in patients with cystic fibrosis. The most significant abnormalities are nonspecific and commonly seen on baseline films in cystic fibrosis without ABPA and persist after treatment in most cases.