The objective of this prospective open study was to determine the feasibility of obtaining mature spermatozoa for intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) by testicular fine needle aspiration (TEFNA) in men diagnosed with non-obstructive azoospermia. TEFNA consisted of a mean of 15 punctures and aspirations in each testis, using 23 gauge butterfly needles, connected to a 20 ml syringe with an aspiration handle. Patients (n = 85) underwent 111 TEFNA cycles. Mature testicular spermatozoa were recovered in 65 (58.5%) cycles from 50 (58.8%) patients. The sperm recovery rate by testicular histology was 14 out of 29 (48.3%) in patients with Sertoli cell-only, 13 out of 28 (46.4%) in patients with maturation arrest, 19 out of 20 (95%) in patients with hypospermatogenesis, four out of six (66.6%) in patients with tubular hyalinization due to non-mosaic Klinefelter's syndrome. No spermatozoa were found in two cases with post-irradiation fibrosis. ICSI was performed in all 65 cycles. In 58 cycles in which only the husbands' spermatozoa were used, 406 mature oocytes were injected, and 154 (37.9%) were normally fertilized. Of the 143 embryos that developed (92.8%), 119 were transferred in 42 cycles resulting in 18 clinical pregnancies (42. 8%), with 31 gestational sacs, providing an implantation rate of 26%. One abortion of a singleton pregnancy occurred (5.6%). No major side-effects, such as haematoma or infection were recorded. In conclusion, we have found TEFNA to be efficient, easy to learn, safe and well tolerated by all patients. In our opinion, TEFNA should be considered the first choice whenever sperm recovery is attempted in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia.
According to this relatively small-scale study laparoscopic appendectomy in pregnant women may be as safe as open appendectomy. This procedure is technically feasible in all trimesters of pregnancy and associated with the same known benefits of laparoscopic surgery that nonpregnant patients experience.
Background. Intensive management and elective delivery between 32 and 35 weeks of monoamniotic twin pregnancies were suggested as improving perinatal outcome. We sought to evaluate this management as viewed by the outcome of monoamniotic twin pregnancies in our population. Methods. A retrospective systematic chart review of all monoamniotic twin pregnancies, diagnosed from January 1986 to June 2002, was performed in three medical centers. Demographics, pregnancy course, and perinatal outcome were evaluated. The management and outcome were compared between the group of survivors and the groups of intrauterine fetal demise (IUFD) and miscarriage. Results. Thirty-three pairs of monoamniotic twins were identified. Excluded were three women, who chose to terminate the pregnancy. Total survival rate was 60% (of 60 fetuses, 36 were born alive, but one neonate died due to sepsis). None of the IUFD occurred in hospitalized patients, and two pairs of twins died after 32 weeks. In the 10 twin pairs who died in utero, cord entanglement was documented in eight (80%). There were two cases of twin discordance and two cases of twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome. One twin of the live-born group had congenital transposition of the great arteries. Furthermore, one of the hospitalized patients was delivered by means of an emergency cesarean section because of a non-reassuring non-stress test at 30 weeks. Conclusions. Women with monoamniotic twin pregnancies should be advised about the very high mortality and morbidity rate. Early diagnosis, close in-hospital antenatal surveillance starting at fetal viability, and elective delivery at 32 weeks would reduce the antenatal mortality.
Diagnosis of isolated hemivertebra might be associated with a favorable outcome. The 3 key factors in achieving an optimal spine at maturity, early diagnosis, anticipation, and prevention of deterioration, might be enhanced by our joint multidisciplinary approach to the diagnosis of skeletal anomalies.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.