Background: The traditional curriculum is "discipline based" with high degree of compartmentalization of different subjects into preclinical, paraclinical, and clinical branches. Students often fail to get a comprehensive knowledge of the subjects, resulting in poor performance in the examinations. The relevance of the various subjects is not appreciated, and the knowledge gained is inadequate for clinical application. The outcome of the curriculum gets defeated when the students on graduation are unable to meet the needs of the society as "physicians of first contact." This study was conducted to know whether integrated teaching results in better performance in the examinations. Objective: To compare the effectiveness of horizontal integrated approach with traditional teaching approach in first-year MBBS students in the study of the structure, function, and relevant biochemical aspects of the bone. Material and Methods: Hundred students of first-year MBBS were randomly allocated into the study group and the control group. The students of the study group were exposed to horizontal integrated teaching of bone by faculty from the departments of anatomy, physiology, and biochemistry. The students of the control group were exposed to traditional lectures by the same faculty on different days during the routine class schedules. Assessment was conducted on both the groups by a written examination, and their results were tabulated. Statistical analysis was done using unpaired t-test. The students of the control group were also given the integrated session after the assessment was completed, and a feedback was obtained from both the groups. Result: There was significant difference in the marks obtained on comparison between the two groups of students (P = 0.0022; 95% confidence interval:-8.705,-1.985). Feedback from the students showed that 75% of them felt that integrated teaching helped in better comprehension of the subjects. Majority of the students (70%) felt that integrated approach to teaching was better than the traditional, and 64% of the students felt that it helped in better retention of knowledge and easier recollection during the examinations. Conclusion: The learning outcome as measured by the assessment was better in the group that was exposed to the integrated approach of teaching, compared with that exposed to traditional teaching.
The need for alternative and more productive teaching methods and materials that supplement the traditional lecture format is increasingly being emphasized in medical education. The new teaching tools should encourage students to interact with each other and also with the teachers and should enhance critical thinking. To help students understand and realize the importance of proper prescription writing and the magnitude of this problem, we developed this simple PowerPoint game based on the TV game show, 'Jeopardy'. At the end of the activity the students rated the activity highly and mentioned that they would like to have similar activities for other topics as well.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.