Hepatitis C recurrence after liver transplantation (LT) is universal, and frequently leads to cirrhosis and death. The aim of our study was to assess the efficacy and safety of 48-weeks of full-dose peg-interferon-a-2a (n = 4) or a -2b (n = 51) plus ribavirin (>11 mg/kg/day) in a multicentric cohort of 55 patients ≥12 months after LT. All subjects had histologically proven HCV recurrence, excluding severe cholestatic recurrence. Mean age was 54.3 ± 9.7, 77% male, 90.9% genotype 1, 32.7% cirrhotics. All but 5 patients received monotherapy with tacrolimus (54.5%), cyclosporine (30.7%) or mycophenolate mofetil (5.5%). The rates of end-of-treatment response and sustained virological response (SVR) were 66.7% and 43.6%, respectively. Low baseline HCV-RNA (p = 0.005) and a length from LT to therapy between 2-4 years (p = 0.011) were predictors of SVR. The lack of achieving a viral load decrease ≥1-log 10 at week 4 and/or 2-log 10 at week 12 was 100% predictive of failure. The most frequent side effects were neutropenia (76,4%), anemia (60%) and infectious complications (30.9%). Toxicity led to peg-interferon withdrawal in 16 (29%) subjects. In 15 patients with post-treatment biopsy, the histological activity index was significantly improved (p = 0.006), whereas fibrosis did not change (p = 0.14). Three patients died (cholangitis, hepatic artery thrombosis and lung cancer). In conclusion, HCV therapy after LT was very effective, although it led to a significant rate of toxicity.

The protective capacity and duration of humoral immunity after SARS‐CoV‐2 infection are not yet understood in solid organ transplant recipients. A prospective multicenter study was performed to evaluate the persistence of anti‐nucleocapsid IgG antibodies in liver transplant recipients 6 months after coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) resolution. A total of 71 liver transplant recipients were matched with 71 immunocompetent controls by a propensity score including variables with a well‐known prognostic impact in COVID‐19. Paired case–control serological data were also available in 62 liver transplant patients and 62 controls at month 3 after COVID‐19. Liver transplant recipients showed a lower incidence of anti‐nucleocapsid IgG antibodies at 3 months (77.4% vs. 100%, p < .001) and at 6 months (63.4% vs. 90.1%, p < .001). Lower levels of antibodies were also observed in liver transplant patients at 3 (p = .001) and 6 months (p < .001) after COVID‐19. In transplant patients, female gender (OR = 13.49, 95% CI: 2.17–83.8), a longer interval since transplantation (OR = 1.19, 95% CI: 1.03–1.36), and therapy with renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system inhibitors (OR = 7.11, 95% CI: 1.47–34.50) were independently associated with persistence of antibodies beyond 6 months after COVID‐19. Therefore, as compared with immunocompetent patients, liver transplant recipients show a lower prevalence of anti‐SARS‐CoV‐2 antibodies and more pronounced antibody levels decline.

Background. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection causes morbidity in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients, either by direct injury or in association with chronic allograft rejection or other opportunistic infections. Ganciclovir is the treatment of choice, but this agent requires intravenous administration, which affects its feasibility for longterm use. Valganciclovir, which has an oral bioavailability of 60%, has proven to be useful for prophylaxis of CMV infection in high-risk SOT recipients and for treating retinitis in persons with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome.Objective. To compare the efficacy of valganciclovir (alone or as sequential therapy after a regimen of intravenous ganciclovir) with intravenous ganciclovir alone for preemptive therapy or treatment of CMV disease (viral syndrome or focal disease) in SOT recipients and to determine the incidence of adverse effects and relapses.Methods. In this 2-year prospective, comparative cohort study, 376 episodes of preemptive therapy or treatment of CMV disease were recorded among 334 of 3467 SOT recipients included in the Spanish Network for Research on Infection in Transplantation (RESITRA) database. Intravenous ganciclovir was the first-line treatment in 170 episodes; valganciclovir followed by intravenous ganciclovir was administered in 82 episodes, and valganciclovir alone was administered in 112 episodes.Results. Valganciclovir was used as preemptive therapy or treatment for CMV disease in 84 and 28 episodes, respectively. Duration of treatment was longer in valganciclovir recipients than in ganciclovir recipients for both preemptive therapy (21 vs. 15 days;) or viral syndrome treatment (21 vs. 18 days; ). In the val-P ! .001 P ! .01 ganciclovir arm, 94 (83.9%) of 112 episodes were treated successfully, with no statistical difference in the success rates versus the ganciclovir arm (85.8%) or ganciclovir-valganciclovir arm (95.1%). Eighteen episodes (16.1%) treated with valganciclovir were considered to have resulted in treatment failure (because of persistent antigenemia in 4 [3.6%], on the basis of clinical decision in 7 [6.2%], and because of recurrent disease in 7 [6.2%]). There were no incidents in which valganciclovir treatment was withdrawn because of toxicity.Conclusion. Valganciclovir is safe and useful for preemptive therapy and treatment of CMV disease.

Direct-acting antivirals have proved to be highly efficacious and safe in monoinfected liver transplant (LT) recipients who experience recurrence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. However, there is a lack of data on effectiveness and tolerability of these regimens in HCV/HIV-coinfected patients who experience recurrence of HCV infection after LT. In this prospective, multicenter cohort study, the outcomes of 47 HCV/HIV-coinfected LT patients who received DAA therapy (with or without ribavirin [RBV]) were compared with those of a matched cohort of 148 HCV-monoinfected LT recipients who received similar treatment. Baseline characteristics were similar in both groups. HCV/HIV-coinfected patients had a median (IQR) CD4 T-cell count of 366 (256-467) cells/µL. HIV-RNA was <50 copies/mL in 96% of patients. The DAA regimens administered were SOF + LDV ± RBV (34%), SOF + SMV ± RBV (31%), SOF + DCV ± RBV (27%), SMV + DCV ± RBV (5%), and 3D (3%), with no differences between the groups. Treatment was well tolerated in both groups. Rates of SVR (negative serum HCV-RNA at 12 weeks after the end of treatment) were high and similar for coinfected and monoinfected patients (95% and 94%, respectively; P = .239). Albeit not significant, a trend toward lower SVR rates among patients with advanced fibrosis (P = .093) and genotype 4 (P = .088) was observed. In conclusion, interferon-free regimens with DAAs for post-LT recurrence of HCV infection in HIV-infected individuals were highly effective and well tolerated, with results comparable to those of HCV-monoinfected patients.

Bacterial infections may complicate the course of COVID-19 patients. The rate and predictors of bacterial infections were examined in patients consecutively admitted with COVID-19 at one tertiary hospital in Madrid between March 1st and April 30th, 2020. Among 1594 hospitalized patients with COVID-19, 135 (8.5%) experienced bacterial infectious events, distributed as follows: urinary tract infections (32.6%), bacteremia (31.9%), pneumonia (31.8%), intra-abdominal infections (6.7%) and skin and soft tissue infections (6.7%). Independent predictors of bacterial infections were older age, neurological disease, prior immunosuppression and ICU admission (p < 0.05). Patients with bacterial infections who more frequently received steroids and tocilizumab, progressed to lower Sap02/FiO2 ratios, and experienced more severe ARDS (p < 0.001). The mortality rate was significantly higher in patients with bacterial infections as compared to the rest (25% vs 6.7%, respectively; p < 0.001). In multivariate analyses, older age, prior neurological or kidney disease, immunosuppression and ARDS severity were associated with an increased mortality (p < 0.05) while bacterial infections were not. Conversely, the use of steroids or steroids plus tocilizumab did not confer a higher risk of bacterial infections and improved survival rates. Bacterial infections occurred in 8.5% of patients hospitalized with COVID-19 during the first wave of the pandemic. They were not independently associated with increased mortality rates. Baseline COVID-19 severity rather than the incidence of bacterial infections seems to contribute to mortality. When indicated, the use of steroids or steroids plus tocilizumab might improve survival in this population.

Summary Steroid‐free immunosuppressive regimens reduce corticosteroid‐related side effects in liver transplant recipients although their efficacy is very variable. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of a steroid‐free regimen in a 6‐month, open‐label, multicenter, pilot study, which involved 102 liver transplant patients treated with daclizumab (2 mg/kg within 6 h following transplant and 1 mg/kg on day 7), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF, 1 g b.i.d) and tacrolimus (trough levels of 5–15 ng/ml in the first month and 5–10 ng/ml thereafter). One intra‐operative dose of methylprednisolone was administered. At 6 months, the acute rejection rate was 9.8%, and patient and graft survival rates were 96% and 95%, respectively. Acute rejection rates were similar for hepatitis C‐positive patients (8.6%) and hepatitis C‐negative patients (10.4%). Infections occurred in 22% of patients; most cases were considered mild or moderate. Post‐transplantation hypertension and diabetes mellitus developed in 37% and 14% of patients, respectively, during the study period, but were markedly less frequent (8% and 6%, respectively) at 6 months. Hypercholesterolemia was observed in only 2% of patients. In conclusion, the steroid‐free immunosuppressive regimen of daclizumab, MMF, and tacrolimus effectively prevents acute rejection after liver transplantation without decreasing safety.

Objectives To analyze whether subgroups of immunosuppressive (IS) medications confer different outcomes in COVID-19. Methods Multicenter retrospective cohort of consecutive immunosuppressed patients (ISP) hospitalized with COVID-19 from March to July 2020. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. A propensity score-matched (PSM) model comparing ISP and non-ISP was planned, as well as specific PSM models comparing individual IS medications associated with mortality. Results Out of 16,647 patients, 868 (5.2%) were on chronic IS therapy prior to admission and were considered ISP. In the PSM model, ISP had greater in-hospital mortality (OR 1.25, 95%CI 0.99-1.62), which was related to a worse outcome associated with chronic corticoids (OR 1.89, 95%CI 1.43-2.49). Other IS drugs had no repercussion on mortality risk (including calcineurin inhibitors (CNI), OR 1.19, 95% CI 0.65-2.20). In the pre-planned specific PSM model within patients on chronic IS treatment before admission, corticosteroids were associated with an increased risk of mortality (OR 2.34, 95%CI 1.43-3.82). Conclusions Chronic IS therapies pose a heterogeneous group of drugs with different risk profiles for severe COVID-19 and death. Chronic systemic corticosteroid is associated with increased mortality. On the contrary, CNI and other IS treatments prior to admission do not seem to convey different outcomes.

In order to provide dentists with specific guidelines regarding appropriate oral treatments for transplant patients, their timing, and the prophylactic steps that must be taken in their handling, a two-phase study was undertaken. In the first phase, the effectiveness of an initial oral hygiene training and motivation program was evaluated by statistical testing of the observed differences in gingival overgrowth and plaque and gingivitis scores between a study group and a control group, each consisting of 46 heart and liver transplant patients. Significantly higher scores were observed in the control group. In the second phase, the effectiveness of a set of prophylactic measures was tested in 530 periodontal treatments and 380 dental treatments, applied in 120 heart, liver, and kidney transplant patients who showed no significant complications. It was concluded that all transplant patients should be monitored by a dentist, and that the recommended procedure is effective in preventing oral treatment complications.