Decreased vagal activity and increased sympathetic arousal have been proposed as major contributors to the increased risk of cardiovascular mortality in patients with depression. It was aim of the present study to assess the feasibility of using heart rate variability (HRV) biofeedback to treat moderate to severe depression. This was an open-label study in which 14 patients with different degrees of depression (13 f, 1 m) aged 30 years (18-47; median; range) and 12 healthy volunteers attended 6 sessions of HRV biofeedback over two weeks. Another 12 healthy subjects were observed under an active control condition. At follow up BDI was found significantly decreased (BDI 6; 2-20; median 25%-75% quartile) as compared to baseline conditions (BDI 22;15-29) in patients with depression. In addition, depressed patients had reduced anxiety, decreased heart rate and increased HRV after conduction of biofeedback (p < 0.05). By contrast, no changes were noted in healthy subjects receiving biofeedback nor in normal controls. In conclusion, HRV biofeedback appears to be a useful adjunct for the treatment of depression, associated with increases in HRV.
Background/Aim: Inadequate fluid intake is assumed to be a trigger of water-loss dehydration, which is a major health risk in aged and geriatric populations. Thus, there is a need to search for easy to use diagnostic tests to identify dehydration. Our overall aim was to investigate whether skin barrier parameters could be used for predicting fluid intake and/or hydration status in geriatric patients. Methods: An explorative observational comparative study was conducted in a geriatric hospital including patients aged 65 years and older. We measured 3-day fluid intake, skin barrier parameters, Overall Dry Skin Score, serum osmolality, cognitive and functional health, and medications. Results: Forty patients were included (mean age 78.45 years and 65% women) with a mean fluid intake of 1,747 mL/day. 20% of the patients were dehydrated and 22.5% had an impending dehydration according to serum osmolality. Multivariate analysis suggested that skin surface pH and epidermal hydration at the face were associated with fluid intake. Serum osmolality was associated with epidermal hydration at the leg and skin surface pH at the face. Fluid intake was not correlated with serum osmolality. Diuretics were associated with high serum osmolality. Conclusions: Approximately half of the patients were diagnosed as being dehydrated according to osmolality, which is the current reference standard. However, there was no association with fluid intake, questioning the clinical relevance of this measure. Results indicate that single skin barrier parameters are poor markers for fluid intake or osmolality. Epidermal hydration might play a role but most probably in combination with other tests.
Background Frailty development is partly dependent on multiple factors like low levels of nutrients and high levels of oxidative stress (OS) and inflammation potentially leading to a muscle‐catabolic state. Measures of specific biomarker patterns including nutrients, OS and inflammatory biomarkers as well as muscle related biomarkers like 3‐methylhistidine (3MH) may improve evaluation of mechanisms and the complex networks leading to frailty. Methods In 220 multi‐morbid patients (≥ 60 years), classified as non‐frail (n = 104) and frail (n = 116) according to Fried's frailty criteria, we measured serum concentrations of fat‐soluble micronutrients, amino acids (AA), OS, interleukins (IL) 6 and 10, 3MH (biomarker for muscle protein turnover) and serum spectra of fatty acids (FA). We evaluated biomarker patterns by principal component analysis (PCA) and their cross‐sectional associations with frailty by multivariate logistic regression analysis. Results Two biomarker patterns [principal components (PC)] were identified by PCA. PC1 was characterized by high positive factor loadings (FL) of carotenoids, anti‐inflammatory FA and vitamin D3 together with high negative FL of pro‐inflammatory FA, IL6 and IL6/IL10, reflecting an inflammation‐related pattern. PC2 was characterized by high positive FL of AA together with high negative FL of 3MH‐based biomarkers, reflecting a muscle‐related pattern. Frail patients had significantly lower factor scores than non‐frail patients for both PC1 [median: −0.27 (interquartile range: 1.15) vs. 0.27 (1.23); P = 0.001] and PC2 [median: −0.15 (interquartile range: 1.13) vs. 0.21 (1.38); P = 0.002]. Patients with higher PC1 or PC2 factor scores were less likely to be frail [odds ratio (OR): 0.62, 95% CI: 0.46–0.83, P = 0.001 for PC1; OR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.48–0.86, P = 0.003 for PC2] compared with patients with lower PC1 or PC2 factor scores. This indicates that increasing levels of anti‐inflammatory biomarkers and increasing levels of muscle‐anabolic biomarkers are associated with a reduced likelihood (38% and 36%, respectively) for frailty. Significant associations remained after adjusting the regression models for potential confounders. Conclusions We conclude that two specific patterns reflecting either inflammation‐related or muscle‐related biomarkers are both significantly associated with frailty among multi‐morbid patients and that these specific biomarker patterns are more informative than single biomarker analyses considering frailty identification.
ZusammenfassungChronische Wunden treten sehr häufig in der Versorgung älterer Menschen auf. Studien zufolge gibt es alleine in Deutschland etwa 2,7 Millionen Wundpatienten, von denen ca. 890 000 an chronischen Wunden leiden 1. Die Behandlung chronischer Wunden ist aufwendig und teuer und bedarf daher besonders guter Kenntnisse. Die Kenntnis der Wundheilungsphasen und der stadiengerechte Einsatz der verschiedenen Wundauflagen sind Grundvoraussetzungen für eine erfolgreiche lokale Therapie. Die lokale Wundtherapie macht aber nur dann Sinn, wenn die zugrunde liegenden Ursachen der chronischen Wunde mitbehandelt werden.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.