No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Phytochrome A signaling shows two photobiologically discrete outputs: so-called very-low-fluence responses (VLFR) and high-irradiance responses (HIR). By modifying previous screening protocols, we isolated two Arabidopsis mutants retaining VLFR and lacking HIR. Phytochrome A negatively or positively regulates phytochrome B signaling, depending on light conditions. These mutants retained the negative but lacked the positive regulation. Both mutants carry the novel phyA-302 allele, in which Glu-777 (a residue conserved in angiosperm phytochromes) changed to Lys in the PAS2 motif of the C-terminal domain. The phyA-302 mutants showed a 50% reduction in phytochrome A levels in darkness, but this difference was compensated for by greater stability under continuous far-red light. phyA-302:green fluorescent protein fusion proteins showed normal translocation from the cytosol to the nucleus under continuous far-red light but failed to produce nuclear spots, suggesting that nuclear speckles could be involved in HIR signaling and phytochrome A degradation. We propose that the PAS2 domain of phytochrome A is necessary to initiate signaling in HIR but not in VLFR, likely via interaction with a specific partner.

Cyanobacterial phytochromes are a diverse family of light receptors controlling various biological functions including phototaxis. In addition to canonical bona fide phytochromes of the well characterized Cph1/plant-like clade, cyanobacteria also harbor phytochromes that absorb green, violet or blue light. The Synechocystis PCC 6803 Cph2 photoreceptor, a phototaxis inhibitor, is unconventional in bearing two distinct chromophore-binding GAF domains. Whereas the C-terminal GAF domain is most likely involved in blue-light perception, the first two domains correspond to a Cph1-like photosensory module lacking the PAS domain. Biochemical and spectroscopic studies show that this region switches between red (P(r) ) and far-red (P(fr) ) absorbing states. Unlike Cph1, the P(fr) state of Cph2 decays rapidly in darkness. Mutations close to the PCB chromophore further destabilize the P(fr) state without drastically affecting the spectroscopic features such as the quantum efficiency of P(r) →P(fr) conversion, fluorescence, or the Resonance-Raman signature of the chromophore. Overall, the PAS-less photosensory module of Cph2 resembles Cph1 including its mode of isomerisation, but the P(fr) state is unstable.

Fluorescence (F) emission spectra of the red‐absorbing phytochrome form (Pr) at 85 K, temperature dependence of the F intensity and the extent of the Pr F changes in the phototransformation of Pr into the first stable photoproduct (lumi‐R) at 85 K (γ1,) and into the far‐red‐absorbing form (Pfr) at 267 K (γ2) were investigated in etiolated shoots and roots of monocots (oat, maize, rice) and dicots (pea, cress). These characteristics monotonously changed as a function of the phytochrome content, [Ptot]: with its decrease to 3‐5% of the maximal values, the F spectrum shifts from 686 nm to 682 nm, its half‐band width rises from 22 nm to ca 25 nm, temperature dependence of Pr F changes its character, γ1, drops down from ca > 0.45 to ca 0.05‐0.10 and γ2 from 0.80–0.82 to 0.70. These data were interpreted in terms of two different phytochromes whose relative concentration varies with [Ptot]: (1) a longer wavelength type with the F maximum at 686 nm, low activation energy of the photoreaction (Ea 3–4 kj/ mol) and high extent of the phototransformation at 85 K (0.49 ± 0.03) and at 267 K (ca 0.85) (Pra); (2) a shorter wavelength type practically inactive at 85 K with F maximum at 682 nm, higher Ea (ca 35 kj/mol) and lower extent of the Pr & Pfr phototransformation (0.70) (Pri). [Pra] widely varies in different parts of the seedlings (up to 100 times) and Pra dominates when [Ptot] is high. The [Pri] is much more constant (variations, <10 times), and it becomes the major one when [Ptot] drops down. The two species are likely to belong to the labile (type 1) and stable pools of pigment and not to be connected with the localization of the pigment in the cell since red‐far‐red preillu‐mination, which is believed to bring about sequestering of the pigment, does not change their relative concentration and properties.

No abstract