Integrins, a diverse class of heterodimeric cell surface receptors, are key regulators of cell structure and behaviour, affecting cell morphology, proliferation, survival and differentiation. Consequently, mutations in specific integrins, or their deregulated expression, are associated with a variety of diseases. In the last decades, many integrin-specific ligands have been developed and used for modulation of integrin function in medical as well as biophysical studies. The IC50-values reported for these ligands strongly vary and are measured using different cell-based and cell-free systems. A systematic comparison of these values is of high importance for selecting the optimal ligands for given applications. In this study, we evaluate a wide range of ligands for their binding affinity towards the RGD-binding integrins αvβ3, αvβ5, αvβ6, αvβ8, α5β1, αIIbβ3, using homogenous ELISA-like solid phase binding assay.

Integrins are key regulators of communication between cells and with their microenvironment. Eight members of the integrin superfamily recognize the tripeptide motif Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD) within extracelluar matrix (ECM) proteins. These integrins constitute an important subfamily and play a major role in cancer progression and metastasis via their tumor biological functions. Such transmembrane adhesion and signaling receptors are thus recognized as promising and well accessible targets for novel diagnostic and therapeutic applications for directly attacking cancer cells and their fatal microenvironment. Recently, specific small peptidic and peptidomimetic ligands as well as antibodies binding to distinct integrin subtypes have been developed and synthesized as new drug candidates for cancer treatment. Understanding the distinct functions and interplay of integrin subtypes is a prerequisite for selective intervention in integrin-mediated diseases. Integrin subtype-specific ligands labelled with radioisotopes or fluorescent molecules allows the characterization of the integrin patterns in vivo and later the medical intervention via subtype specific drugs. The coating of nanoparticles, larger proteins, or encapsulating agents by integrin ligands are being explored to guide cytotoxic reagents directly to the cancer cell surface. These ligands are currently under investigation in clinical studies for their efficacy in interference with tumor cell adhesion, migration/invasion, proliferation, signaling, and survival, opening new treatment approaches in personalized medicine.

Diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers are useful tools in defining cancer patients at risk, some are also useful in defining and following therapy (1). In view of the recent discovery in cancer biology that proteolytic factors of the plasminogen activation system not only are associated with the regulation and control of established cancer but also with poor prognosis, various investigations have been conducted to elucidate protease-mediated cellular mechanisms of tumor invasion and metastasis (2-6). Furthernore, rational anticancer drug development has identified substances able to block, bypass or re-regulate tumor-associated proteolysis and thereby diminish tumor spread (3). During tumor invasion and metastasis, tumor cells cross host cellular and extracellular matrix barriers by attachment to and interaction with components of the basement membrane and the extracellular matrix, and by local proteolysis (Figs. I and 2). Penetrating tumor cells focus proteolytic activity to the cell surface through receptors for the serine proteases plasmin and the plasminogen activator UPA (urokinase-type plasminogen activator). The tumor cell receptor for uPA, uPA-R (CD87), binds uPA released from surrounding tumor cells or stroma cells (7). Binding of the protease UPA to uPA-R focusses proteolytic action to the surface of tumor cells. uPA converts enzymatically inactive plasminogen into the serine protease plasmin (Fig. 3). Plasmin degrades proteins of the extracellular matrix thus facilitating extracellular matrix degradation, tumor cell proliferation, invasion, and metastasis. Proteolytic action of uPA is controlled by its inhibitors PAI-1 and PAI-Z which may bind to the cell surface associated uPA-R/uPA complex forming an en zymati call y inactive trimeric receptor-protease-inhibitor complex which is internalized by the tumor cell (8,9).

Background:Tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) are associated with improved survival in several epithelial cancers. The two chemokines CXCL9 and CXCL10 facilitate chemotactic recruitment of TILs, and their intratumoral accumulation is a conceivable way to improve TIL-dependent immune intervention in cancer. However, the prognostic impact of CXCL9 and CXCL10 in high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSC) is largely unknown.Methods:One hundred and eighty four cases of HGSC were immunohistochemically analyzed for CXCL9, CXCL10. TILs were assessed using CD3, CD56 and FOXP3 staining. Chemokine regulation was investigated using the ovarian cancer cell lines OV-MZ-6 and SKOV-3.Results:High expression of CXCL9 and CXCL10 was associated with an approximately doubled overall survival (n=70, CXCL9: HR 0.41; P=0.006; CXCL10: HR 0.46; P=0.010) which was confirmed in an independent validation set (n=114; CXCL9: HR 0.60; P=0.019; CXCL10: HR 0.52; P=0.005). Expression of CXCR3 ligands significantly correlated with TILs. In human ovarian cancer cell lines the cyclooxygenase (COX) metabolite Prostaglandin E2 was identified as negative regulator of chemokine secretion, whereas COX inhibition by indomethacin significantly upregulated CXCL9 and CXCL10. In contrast, celecoxib, the only COX inhibitor prospectively evaluated for therapy of ovarian cancer, suppressed NF-κB activation and inhibited chemokine release.Conclusion:Our results support the notion that CXCL9 and CXCL10 exert tumour-suppressive function by TIL recruitment in human ovarian cancer. COX inhibition by indomethacin, not by celecoxib, may be a promising approach to concomitantly improve immunotherapies.