The study suggests that dronabinol was able to reduce nocturnal motor activity and agitation in severely demented patients. Thus, it appears that dronabinol may be a safe new treatment option for behavioral and circadian disturbances in dementia.

Lithium augmentation is a well established strategy for treatment-resistant depression. The exact mode of its action is unknown, but an enhancement of serotonergic transmission is hypothesized. The authors investigated changes in the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical (HPA) system during lithium augmentation and their correlation to clinical response by means of the combined dexamethasone/CRH test (DEX/CRH test). Thirty patients with unipolar major depressive episodes (DSM IV) who had not responded to an adequate trial with an antidepressantwere assessed on the day before lithium augmentation (baseline) with the DEX/CRH test (pretreatment with 1.5 mg dexamethasone p.o. at 11 P . M . and CRH stimulation at 3 P . M . on the next day). Twenty-four patients were reassessed after response was determined or, in cases of nonresponse, four weeks after initiation of lithium augmentation. Response to lithium augmentation was measured by weekly ratings on the Hamilton DepressionRating Scale Regardless of the initial choice of antidepressant, about 30 to 40% of patients with major depressive disorder will not respond sufficiently (Thase and Rush 1995 Among the various treatment options that have been proposed for non-responding depressed patients, lithium augmentation has been recommended as a first-line strategy . The efficacy of lithium augmentation has been well documented in placebo-controlled acute (Joffe et al. 1993;Katona et al. 1995;Baumann et al. 1996) and continuation treatment trials (Bauer et al. 2000;Bschor et al. 2002) using different classes of antidepressants. A recent meta-analysis confirmed the evidence that lithium augmentation is superior to placebo augmentation for the treatment of unipolar major depression, with a median response rate of 50% across double-blind studies (Bauer and Döpfmer 1999). Severity of depression was recently identified as a clinical predictor of response to lithium augmentation (Bschor et al. 2001). Better knowledge of the neurobiological mechanisms of lithium augmentation would help to identify patients who will respond favorably to this treatment intervention. However, to date, the mode of action of lithium augmentation is unknown. Shortly after the initial report on its efficacy (de Montigny et al. 1981), it was postulated by de Montigny et al. (1983) that a pharmacodynamic action mediated via the serotonergic systems might account for the synergistic effect of lithium when added to a tricyclic antidepressant.Another system potentially involved in its mechanism of action is the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical (HPA) system, putatively the best studied biological system in affective disorders (Dinan 1997). The most sensitive challenge test of the HPA system is the combined dexamethasone/CRH test (DEX/CRH test) (Heuser 1998). A dysfunction in the regulation of the HPA system, especially an overstimulation of ACTH and cortisol in the DEX/CRH test, was repeatedly shown in depressed patients (for a review see Steckler et al. 1999;Holsboer 2000). In treatment studies with ...

LeAD study, http://www.lead-studie.de , NCT01679145.

No abstract

Although considerable evidence exists on the efficacy of lithium as an augmenting agent in refractory depression, the underlying neurobiology of this phenomenon is unknown. In patients with major depression, changes of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical (HPA) system have been detected by means of the dexamethasone suppression test (DST), when administered during treatment with tricyclic antidepressants. We investigated whether the DST also reveals alterations of the HPA system during lithium augmentation. We also sought to identify whether response to lithium augmentation can be predicted with the DST. Twenty-five patients with unipolar major depression, who did not respond to an adequate antidepressant monotherapy of at least 4 weeks, were measured for basal (pre-dexamethasone, 0800h) cortisol and ACTH levels and were administered the DST the day before initiation of lithium augmentation treatment. The same neuroendocrine procedures were repeated after 3 to 4 weeks. Criteria of response to lithium augmentation, defined as a reduction of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS17) score by > or =50% and an end point score of 9 or less, were determined by weekly HDRS ratings. The DST revealed a statistically significant increase of the post-dexamethasone cortisol values (P = 0.021) and an increase in the post-dexamethasone ACTH values (P = 0.051) during lithium augmentation as compared to pre-treatment baseline evaluations. The pre-dexamethasone hormone values were unchanged. The number of non-suppressors at baseline was one and increased to three at follow-up. Results of DST did not predict response to lithium augmentation, which occurred in 40% of subjects. Results suggest that lithium augmentation increases HPA system activity, as indicated by the increase of post-dexamethasone cortisol and ACTH levels measured by the DST. This is in contrast to the established decline of HPA system activity during treatment with tricyclic antidepressants.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract