Background: Nocardiosis is a clinical and diagnostic challenge, compounded by lacunae in existing literature. Our objectives were to establish the clinical spectrum of this disease in our setting, describe the most common causative agent of the disease and to ascertain differences in our patient population from available data.Methods & Materials: This was a 10 year (2004)(2005)(2006)(2007)(2008)(2009)(2010)(2011)(2012)(2013) retrospective study carried out at a tertiary care centre in South India, of 131 cases of nocardiosis. The electronic medical records were studied and data analysed.Results: Sixty three percent were male, 23% of all in the sixth decade of life. The most common sites of infection were the skin and the eye -36 (27%) patients each and the lower respiratory tract -35 patients(26%). 48 (37%) patients were on immunosuppressant therapy, either a triple drug therapy following renal transplant, autoimmune disorders/ haematological malignancies on combination immunosuppressants or patients on prolonged corticosteroids. Of 36 patients with nocardiosis of the eye, 30 (83%) were corneal ulcers with history of trauma with vegetative matter or soil, and 5(14%) were endophthalmitis following intraocular lens implantation. 16(46%) patients with respiratory tract nocardiosis had a previous lung pathology. 11(8%) were HIV associated nocardiosis. Disseminated disease was seen in 7(5.3%) patients following renal transplant and in 3(2.3%) patients with SLE, all on triple drug immunosuppression. The most common organism isolated was Nocardia asteroides in 73(56%), followed by Nocardia spp in 32(24%), aerobic actinomycetes in 24(18%) and Nocardia brasiliensis in 2(1.5%). All patients responded to treatment with cotrimoxazole alone or in addition to surgical debridement for cutaneous and subcutaneous lesions. There was only one Nocardiosis related death in this cohort of patients. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing performed on 72 isolates showed 6.9% , 9.7%, 31%, 38%, 75%, 42%, 31%, 74% susceptibility to penicillin, ampicillin, erythromycin, tetracycline, cotrimoxazole, chloramphenicol, cefazolin and triple sulfa respectively.Conclusion: We report a predominance of nocardiosis from the eye and nocardiosis following immunosuppression. The most common species isolated was N.asteroides. A paucity in HIV associated nocardiosis is striking. Antimicrobial susceptibility showed 75% susceptibility to cotrimoxazole, the drug of choice, which was reflected by a good response to therapy in this cohort. http://dx.

Background In 2013, the Nigeria Federal Ministry of Health established a Master Health Facility List (MHFL) as recommended by WHO. Since then, some health facilities (HFs) have ceased functioning and new facilities were established. We updated the MHFL and assessed service delivery parameters in the Malaria Frontline Project implementing areas in Kano and Zamfara States. Methods We assessed all HFs in each of the 34 project local government areas (LGAs) between July and September 2017. Project staff administered a semi-structured questionnaire developed for this assessment to heads of HFs about the type of facility, category and number of staff working at the facility and to record geo-coordinates of facility. Results In the Kano State project area, 726 HFs were identified and geo-located: 31 were new facilities, 608 (84%), 116 (16%) and two (0.3%) were Primary Health Care (PHC), secondary and tertiary facilities respectively. Using the national definition, there were 710 (98%) functional facilities and 644 (91%) of these reported to the national health information platform, District Health Information System, version 2 (DHIS2). The Zamfara project area had 739 HFs: eight were new, 715 (97%), 22 (3.0%) and two (0.2%) PHCs, secondary and tertiary facilities respectively. There were 695 (94%) functional facilities with 656 (94%) of these reporting to DHIS2. Using national criteria for primary health care designation, only 95 (9%) of all PHCs in the two States met the minimum human resource requirements. Conclusion Most HFs were functional and reported to DHIS2. A comprehensive MHFL having all the important parameters that should be established and updated regularly by authorities to make it more useful for health services administration and management. Most functional facilities are understaffed.

No abstract

Background The Malaria Frontline Project (MFP) supported the National Malaria Elimination Program for effective program implementation in the high malaria-burden states of Kano and Zamfara adapting the National Stop Transmission of Polio (NSTOP) program elimination strategies. Project implementation The MFP was implemented in 34 LGAs in the two states (20 out of 44 in Kano and all 14 in Zamfara). MFP developed training materials and job aids tailored to expected service delivery for primary and district health facilities and strengthened supportive supervision. Pre- and post-implementation assessments of intervention impacts were conducted in both states. Results A total of 158 (Kano:83; Zamfara:75) and 180 (Kano:100; Zamfara:80) healthcare workers (HCWs), were interviewed for pre-and post-implementation assessments, respectively. The proportions of HCWs with correct knowledge on diagnostic criteria were Kano: 97.5% to 92.0% and Zamfara: 94.7% to 98.8%; and knowledge of recommended first line treatment of uncomplicated malaria were Kano: 68.7% to 76.0% and Zamfara: 69.3% to 65.0%. The proportion of HCWs who adhered to national guidelines for malaria diagnosis and treatment increased in both states (Kano: 36.1% to 73.0%; Zamfara: 39.2% to 67.5%) and HCW knowledge to confirm malaria diagnosis slightly decreased in Kano State but increased in Zamfara State (Kano: 97.5% to 92.0%; Zamfara: 94.8% to 98.8%). HCWs knowledge of correct IPTp drug increased in both states (Kano: 81.9% to 94.0%; Zamfara: 85.3% to 97.5%). Conclusion MFP was successfully implemented using tailored training materials, job aids, supportive supervision, and data use. The project strategy can likely be adapted to improve the effectiveness of malaria program implementation in other Nigerian states, and other malaria endemic countries.

No abstract

No abstract