Sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulators and anti-CD20 treatment are widely used disease-modifying treatments for multiple sclerosis. Unfortunately, they may impair the patient’s ability to mount sufficient humoral and T-cellular responses to vaccination, which is of special relevance in the context of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. We present here a case series of six multiple sclerosis patients on treatment with sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulators who failed to develop SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies and T-cells after three doses of vaccination. Due to their ongoing immunotherapy, lacking vaccination response, and additional risk factors, we offered them pre-exposure prophylactic treatment with monoclonal SARS-CoV-2-neutralizing antibodies. Initially, treatment was conducted with the antibody cocktail casirivimab/imdevimab. When the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant became predominant, we switched treatment to monoclonal antibody sotrovimab due to its sustained neutralizing ability also against the Omicron strain. Since sotrovimab was approved only for the treatment of COVID-19 infection and not for pre-exposure prophylaxis, we switched treatment to tixagevimab/cilgavimab as soon as it was granted marketing authorization in the European Union. This antibody cocktail has retained, albeit reduced, neutralizing activity against the Omicron variant and is approved for pre-exposure prophylaxis. No severe adverse events were recorded for our patients. One patient had a positive RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 under treatment with sotrovimab, but was asymptomatic. The other five patients did not develop symptoms of an upper respiratory tract infection or evidence of a SARS-CoV-2 infection during the time of treatment up until the finalization of this report. SARS-CoV-2-neutralizing antibody treatment should be considered individually for multiple sclerosis patients lacking adequate vaccination responses on account of their immunomodulatory treatment, especially in times of high incidences of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Objective: It is well-known that initiation of fingolimod induces a transient decrease of heart rate. However, the underlying cardiac autonomic regulation is poorly understood. We aimed to investigate the changes of autonomic activity caused by the first dose of fingolimod using a long-term multiple trigonometric spectral analysis for the first time. In addition, we sought to use the continuous Holter ECG recording to find predictors for fingolimod induced bradycardia.Methods: Seventy-eight patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) were included. As a part of the START study (NCT01585298), continuous electrocardiogram was recorded before fingolimod initiation, and until no <6 h post medication. Time domain and frequency domain heart rate variability (HRV) parameters were computed hourly to assess cardiac autonomic regulation. A long-term multiple trigonometric regressive spectral (MTRS) analysis was applied on successive 1-h-length electrocardiogram recordings. Decision tree analysis was used to find predictors for bradycardia following fingolimod initiation.Results: Most of the HRV parameters representing parasympathetic activities began to increase since the second hour after fingolimod administration. These changes of autonomic regulations were in accordance with the decline of heart rate. Baseline heart rate was highly correlated with nadir heart rate, and was the only significant predicting factor for fingolimod induced bradycardia among various demographic, clinical and cardiovascular variables in the decision tree analysis.Conclusions: The first dose application of fingolimod enhances the cardiac parasympathetic activity during the first 6 h post medication, which might be the underlying autonomic mechanism of reduced heart rate. Baseline heart rate is a powerful predictor for bradycardia caused by fingolimod.

No abstract