IntroductionThis post hoc pooled analysis of four real-world studies (SURE Canada, Denmark/Sweden, Switzerland and UK) aimed to characterize the use of once-weekly (OW) semaglutide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA), in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D).Research design and methodsThe Semaglutide Real-world Evidence (SURE) studies had a duration of ~30 weeks. Changes in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and body weight (BW) were analyzed for the overall population and the following baseline subgroups: GLP-1RA-naïve/GLP-1RA switchers; body mass index <25/≥25–<30/≥30–<35/≥35 kg/m2; age <65/≥65 years; HbA1c <7%/≥7–≤8%/>8–≤9%/>9%; T2D duration <5/≥5–<10/≥10 years. Data for patients achieving treatment targets were analyzed in the overall population and the baseline HbA1c ≥7% subgroup.ResultsOf 1212 patients, 960 were GLP-1RA-naïve and 252 had switched to semaglutide from another GLP-1RA. In the overall population, HbA1c was reduced from baseline to end of study (EOS) by –1.1% point and BW by –4.7 kg; changes were significant for all subgroups. There were significantly larger reductions of HbA1c and BW in GLP-1RA-naïve versus GLP-1RA switchers and larger reductions in HbA1c for patients with higher versus lower baseline HbA1c. At EOS, 52.6% of patients in the overall population achieved HbA1c <7%. No new safety concerns were identified in any of the completed SURE studies.ConclusionsIn this pooled analysis, patients with T2D initiating OW semaglutide showed significant improvements from baseline to EOS in HbA1c and BW across various baseline subgroups, including patients previously treated with a GLP-1RA other than semaglutide, supporting OW semaglutide use in clinical practice.Trail registration numbersNCT03457012; NCT03631186; NCT03648281; NCT03876015.

Aim Glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists improve glycaemic control: some are now available as oral and subcutaneous formulations, and some have indications for reducing cardiovascular risk. The expanded scope for these therapies warrants comprehensive safety evaluations. We report the safety/tolerability of subcutaneous and oral semaglutide from the SUSTAIN and PIONEER clinical trial programmes, respectively. Materials and methods Adverse events (AEs) from 16 randomized placebo‐ or active‐controlled phase IIIa trials in patients with type 2 diabetes (n = 11 159) including once‐weekly subcutaneous semaglutide (n = 3150; SUSTAIN trials) or once‐daily oral semaglutide (n = 4116; PIONEER trials) were analysed. Data pools were analysed for each programme, with separate analyses of cardiovascular outcomes trials (CVOTs; n = 6480). Results In the phase IIIa pools, gastrointestinal disorders were reported in 41.9%/39.1% of patients with subcutaneous/oral semaglutide, respectively (most prevalent during initiation/escalation) versus 22.0%/24.8% with comparators. Rates of kidney disorders, acute pancreatitis, malignant neoplasms, hypoglycaemia, diabetic retinopathy, heart failure and other cardiovascular events were similar for semaglutide versus comparators. Cholelithiasis incidence was higher with subcutaneous and oral semaglutide versus placebo. Diabetic retinopathy incidence was higher with subcutaneous semaglutide versus placebo in SUSTAIN 6. Small pulse rate increases occurred with both formulations; there was no increased rate of arrhythmias. Fatal AE incidence was similar between semaglutide and comparators. Versus placebo, CVOTs showed a reduced risk of major adverse cardiovascular events with subcutaneous semaglutide and non‐inferiority criteria were met with oral semaglutide. Conclusions The most common AEs with semaglutide were gastrointestinal disorders, which decreased with continued therapy. These comprehensive safety/tolerability data may better inform patient selection and guidance in care.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS The SURE programme of observational real-world studies is investigating once-weekly (OW) subcutaneous semaglutide in routine clinical practice across a diverse type 2 diabetes (T2D) patient population, including those with chronic kidney disease. This pooled post-hoc analysis of SURE Canada, Denmark/Sweden, Switzerland and UK evaluated OW semaglutide use and outcomes according to kidney function at semaglutide initiation. METHOD The SURE studies (all ∼30 weeks’ duration) enrolled adults (≥18 years) with T2D who received OW semaglutide and other anti-hyperglycaemic drugs prescribed at physician discretion; pooled data were analysed to determine change from baseline to end of study (EOS) in HbA1c and body weight (BW) by estimated glomerular function rate (eGFR) subgroups (&lt;30, 30 to &lt;45,  45 to &lt;60,  60 to &lt;90,  and ≥90 mL/min/1.73 m2). Safety outcomes were assessed; only serious adverse drug reactions (SADRs) were systematically recorded. RESULTS Data from 913 patients with median (interquartile range) age of 61 (54–68) years and T2D duration of 11.0 (6.2–17.2) years were included. Patients with eGFR &lt;45 mL/min/1.73 m2 were more likely to be older with longer T2D duration than those with eGFR ≥45 mL/min/1.73 m2. Patients with low eGFR were more likely to be receiving insulin at baseline than those in higher eGFR subgroups. At EOS, there were significant reductions in HbA1c and BW in all subgroups with eGFR ≥30 mL/min/1.73 m2 (P &lt;0.0001; Figure 1). The rates of SADRs and adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation were low across all eGFR subgroups (≤0.3% and ≤1.8%, respectively). Overall, 50/72 patients who experienced more than or equal to severe or documented hypoglycaemic episode were receiving insulin at baseline. CONCLUSION OW semaglutide provided clinically relevant glycaemic control and BW improvements, and was well tolerated, in patients with varying degrees of kidney impairment at treatment initiation in a real-world setting. These findings support semaglutide use in routine clinical practice regardless of patients’ kidney function.

No abstract

No abstract