The efficacy of trovafloxacin in treating Bacteroides fragilis and Escherichia coli infections was investigated and compared to the efficacy of combined clindamycin and gentamicin therapy in an experimental model of intra-abdominal abscesses in rats. Rats were treated with different doses of CP-116,517-27, a parenteral prodrug of trovafloxacin. Response to treatment was evaluated by mortality rate and elimination of infection (cure rate). Mortality in the control group was 85.4%, whereas in rats treated with trovafloxacin, it was close to 0%. The highest cure rate (89.3%) resulted from the administration of 40 mg of CP-116,517-27 per kg of body weight three times a day (TID) for 10 days (equivalent to 18.15 mg of active drug trovafloxacin per rat per day). The therapeutic response with trovafloxacin was comparable to that of a combination therapy of clindamycin (75 mg/kg) plus gentamicin (20 mg/kg) TID (cure rate, 74%; mortality rate, 5%). The measured peak levels of trovafloxacin in serum and abscess pus were 2.6 +/- 0.3 and 5.2 micrograms/ml, respectively. The tumor necrosis factor alpha levels in the untreated animals were high compared to those for rats treated with trovafloxacin or clindamycin plus gentamicin. These results demonstrate that trovafloxacin as a single agent appears to be as successful as clindamycin plus gentamicin in the treatment of experimental intra-abdominal abscesses in rats.
We investigated the efficacy of trovafloxacin, a new quinolone, in comparison with that of clindamycin in the treatment of intra-abdominal abscesses caused by Bacteroides fragilis in young and senescent mice. The development of abscess formation, the number of viable organisms, and antibiotic concentrations were measured, and the values for young and old mice were compared. Trovafloxacin was well distributed to the tissues in both young and old animals. Although the pharmacokinetics and concentrations of trovafloxacin in serum were similar between young and old mice, the levels in tissue were higher in senescent mice than in young mice. Trovafloxacin therapy sterilized abscesses in 94% of young mice and in 73% of old mice, but this difference was not significant. This therapeutic response to trovafloxacin was similar to that seen with clindamycin. These results suggest that aging may not have any adverse effect on the therapeutic outcome for intra-abdominal abscesses caused by B. fragilis.
Trovafloxacin, a new trifluoroquinolone, was evaluated for its therapeutic efficacy against Klebsiella pneumoniae lung infection in tumour (P388 murine leukaemia cells)-bearing mice, treated with or without a chemotherapeutic agent, daunorubicin (DNR) and in mice without tumour. Its activity was compared with ciprofloxacin and cephazolin. The effect on therapeutic efficacy of the addition of recombinant granulocyte colony stimulating factor (rGCSF) was also examined. Our study showed that both quinolones successfully cured pneumonia owing to infection with K. pneumoniae in mice without tumours but that all antibiotics failed in tumour-bearing mice if DNR was withheld. Substantial differences were noted in DNR-treated tumour-bearing mice with infection-the cure rate with trovafloxacin was 91% whereas the cure rate with ciprofloxacin or cephazolin was 57%. Addition of rGCSF to ciprofloxacin did not substantially improve its efficacy (when assessed by protection against death owing to infection; the survival rate was 41%). Trovafloxacin cure rates ranged from 80 to 90% whether or not rGCSF was added to the treatment regimen. Our results suggest that prior cancer chemotherapy had no adverse effect on the therapeutic efficacy of trovafloxacin, and that trovafloxacin may be a promising therapeutic agent for treatment of bacterial infections in the presence of leucopenia.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.