Nitric oxide reductase (NOR) from P. denitrificans is a membrane-bound protein complex that catalyses the reduction of NO to N(2)O (2NO+2e(-)+2H(+)-->N(2)O+H(2)O) as part of the denitrification process. Even though NO reduction is a highly exergonic reaction, and NOR belongs to the superfamily of O(2)-reducing, proton-pumping heme-copper oxidases (HCuOs), previous measurements have indicated that the reaction catalyzed by NOR is non-electrogenic, i.e. not contributing to the proton electrochemical gradient. Since electrons are provided by donors in the periplasm, this non-electrogenicity implies that the substrate protons are also taken up from the periplasm. Here, using direct measurements in liposome-reconstituted NOR during reduction of both NO and the alternative substrate O(2), we demonstrate that protons are indeed consumed from the 'outside'. First, multiple turnover reduction of O(2) resulted in an increase in pH on the outside of the NOR-vesicles. Second, comparison of electrical potential generation in NOR-liposomes during oxidation of the reduced enzyme by either NO or O(2) shows that the proton transfer signals are very similar for the two substrates proving the usefulness of O(2) as a model substrate for these studies. Last, optical measurements during single-turnover oxidation by O(2) show electron transfer coupled to proton uptake from outside the NOR-liposomes with a tau=15 ms, similar to results obtained for net proton uptake in solubilised NOR [U. Flock, N.J. Watmough, P. Adelroth, Electron/proton coupling in bacterial nitric oxide reductase during reduction of oxygen, Biochemistry 44 (2005) 10711-10719]. NOR must thus contain a proton transfer pathway leading from the periplasmic surface into the active site. Using homology modeling with the structures of HCuOs as templates, we constructed a 3D model of the NorB catalytic subunit from P. denitrificans in order to search for such a pathway. A plausible pathway, consisting of conserved protonatable residues, is suggested.
The respiratory nitric oxide reductase (NOR) from Paracoccus denitrificans catalyzes the two-electron reduction of NO to N(2)O (2NO + 2H(+) + 2e(-) --> N(2)O + H(2)O), which is an obligatory step in the sequential reduction of nitrate to dinitrogen known as denitrification. NOR has four redox-active cofactors, namely, two low-spin hemes c and b, one high-spin heme b(3), and a non-heme iron Fe(B), and belongs to same superfamily as the oxygen-reducing heme-copper oxidases. NOR can also use oxygen as an electron acceptor; this catalytic activity was investigated in this study. We show that the product in the steady-state reduction of oxygen is water. A single turnover of the fully reduced NOR with oxygen was initiated using the flow-flash technique, and the progress of the reaction monitored by time-resolved optical absorption spectroscopy. Two major phases with time constants of 40 micros and 25 ms (pH 7.5, 1 mM O(2)) were observed. The rate constant for the faster process was dependent on the O(2) concentration and is assigned to O(2) binding to heme b(3) at a bimolecular rate constant of 2 x 10(7) M(-)(1) s(-)(1). The second phase (tau = 25 ms) involves oxidation of the low-spin hemes b and c, and is coupled to the uptake of protons from the bulk solution. The rate constant for this phase shows a pH dependence consistent with rate limitation by proton transfer from an internal group with a pK(a) = 6.6. This group is presumably an amino acid residue that is crucial for proton transfer to the catalytic site also during NO reduction.
The bacterial respiratory nitric-oxide reductase (NOR) is a member of the superfamily of O 2 -reducing, proton-pumping, heme-copper oxidases. Even although nitric oxide reduction is a highly exergonic reaction, NOR is not a proton pump and rather than taking up protons from the cytoplasmic (membrane potential-negative) side of the membrane, like the heme-copper oxidases, NOR derives its substrate protons from the periplasmic (membrane potential-positive) side of the membrane. The molecular details of this non-electrogenic proton transfer are not yet resolved, so in this study we have explored a role in a proposed proton pathway for a conserved surface glutamate (Glu-122) in the catalytic subunit (NorB). The effect of substituting Glu-122 with Ala, Gln, or Asp on a single turnover of the reduced NOR variants with O 2 , an alternative and experimentally tractable substrate for NOR, was determined. Electron transfer coupled to proton uptake to the bound O 2 is severely and specifically inhibited in both the E122A and E122Q variants, establishing the importance of a protonatable side chain at this position. In the E122D mutant, proton uptake is retained but it is associated with a significant increase in the observed pK a of the group donating protons to the active site. This suggests that Glu-122 is important in defining this proton donor. A second nearby glutamate (Glu-125) is also required for the electron transfer coupled to proton uptake, further emphasizing the importance of this region of NorB in proton transfer. Because Glu-122 is predicted to lie near the periplasmic surface of NOR, the results provide strong experimental evidence that this residue contributes to defining the aperture of a non-electrogenic "E-pathway" that serves to deliver protons from the periplasm to the buried active site in NOR.
Nitric -oxide reductase (NOR) fromconcomitantly with oxidation of the low spin hemes, leading to an acceleration at low pH. This effect is, however, counteracted by a larger degree of substrate inhibition at low pH. Our data thus show that substrate inhibition in NOR, previously observed during multiple turnovers, already occurs during a single oxidative cycle. Thus, NO must bind to its inhibitory site before electrons redistribute to the active site. The further implications of our data for the mechanism of NO reduction by NOR are discussed.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.