No abstract

None.

This study shows a high prevalence of true-resistant hypertension. This prevalence is lower than that of apparent treatment-resistant hypertension, demonstrating the importance to exclude causes of pseudo-resistant hypertension including white-coat hypertension with the use of ambulatory BP measurement. The burden of resistant hypertension is highest in patients with chronic kidney disease. New treatments for resistant hypertension are highly needed, considering the disastrous complications of the disease.

Background Although diabetes and poor glycaemic control significantly increase the risk of tuberculosis and adversely affect tuberculosis treatment outcomes, the global burden of diabetes in the context of tuberculosis remains unknown. We did a systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate the prevalence of diabetes among patients with tuberculosis at global, regional, and country levels. MethodsWe searched PubMed, Excerpta Medica Database, Web of Science, and Global Index Medicus to identify studies published between Jan 1, 1986, and June 15, 2017, on the prevalence of diabetes in patients with active tuberculosis, with no language restrictions. Criteria to diagnose tuberculosis and diabetes concurred with WHO guidelines. Methodological quality of eligible studies was assessed, and random-effect models meta-analysis served to obtain the pooled prevalence estimate of diabetes among patients with active tuberculosis, globally. Heterogeneity (I²) was assessed via the χ² test on Cochran's Q statistic. This study is registered with PROSPERO, number CRD42016049901. FindingsWe screened 7565 records of which 200 studies (2 291 571 people with active tuberculosis) were included in meta-analyses. The pooled prevalence of diabetes was 15·3% (95% prediction interval 2·5-36·1; I² 99·8%), varying from 0·1% in Latvia to 45·2% in Marshall Islands. Subgroup and metaregression analyses for identifying sources of heterogeneity showed that four International Diabetes Federation (IDF) regions (North America and Caribbean [19·7%], western Pacific [19·4%], southeast Asia [19·0%], Middle East and North Africa [17·5%]) had significantly higher prevalence estimates than the three others (Africa [8·0%], South and Central America [7·7%], and Europe [7·5%]; p<0·0001). Additionally, the prevalence increased with age, in men, and in countries with low tuberculosis burden. The prevalence of diabetes was decreased in countries that had low incomes and low Human Development Index scores. The form of tuberculosis infection and presence of HIV seemed not to affect the prevalence of diabetes among patients with active tuberculosis.Interpretation This study suggests a high burden of diabetes among patients with active tuberculosis, with disparities according to age, sex, regions, level of country income, and development. Cost-effective strategies to curb the burden of diabetes among patients with active tuberculosis are needed.

Background: Although HIV infection and antiretroviral therapy (ART) increase the risk for hypertension in people living with HIV (PLHIV), the global and regional burden of hypertension in PLHIV is not well characterized. Methods: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched multiple databases for studies reporting on hypertension in PLHIV and conducted between 2007 and 2018. Meta-analysis through random-effect models served to obtain the pooled prevalence estimates. Heterogeneity was assessed via the χ2 test on Cochran's Q statistic. Results: We included 194 studies (396 776 PLHIV from 61 countries). The global prevalence of hypertension was 23.6% [95% confidence interval (95% CI: 21.6–25.5)] with substantial heterogeneity. The regional distribution was Western and Central Europe and North America [28.1% (95% CI: 24.5–31.9)], West and Central Africa [23.5% (16.6–31.0)], Latin America and the Caribbean [22.0% (17.8–26.5)], Eastern and Southern Africa [19.9% (17.2–22.8)], and Asia and Pacific [16.5% (12.5–21.0)]; P = 0.0007. No study originated from the Middle East and North Africa, and Eastern Europe and Central Asia regions. The prevalence was higher in high-income countries than others (P = 0.0003) and higher in PLHIV taking ART than those ART-naive (P = 0.0003). The prevalence increased over time (mainly driven by Eastern and Southern Africa) and with age. There was no difference between men and women. We estimated that in 2018, there were 8.9 (95% CI: 8.3–9.6) million cases of hypertension in PLHIV globally, among whom 59.2% were living in Sub-Saharan Africa. Conclusion: Cost-effective strategies to curb the dreadful burden of hypertension among PLHIV are needed.

Background This meta-analysis was conducted to estimate the global burden of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in people living with human immunodeficiency virus (PLWH). Methods We searched multiple databases for studies published between January 1990 and December 2017. HBV infection (hepatitis B surface antigen) was diagnosed with serological assays. A random-effects meta-analysis served to pool data. Results We included 358 studies (834 544 PLWH from 87 countries). The pooled prevalence of HBV infection was 8.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.9%–8.8%), among which 26.8% (95% CI, 22.0%–31.9%) was positive to hepatitis B e antigen. HBV prevalence (with 95% CIs) differed according to region: West and Central Africa, 12.4% (11.0%–13.8%); Middle East and North Africa, 9.9% (6.0%–14.6%); Asia and the Pacific, 9.8% (8.7%–11.0%); Eastern and Southern Africa, 7.4% (6.4%–8.4%); Western and Central Europe and North America, 6.0% (5.5%–6.7%); and Latin America and the Caribbean, 5.1% (4.2%–6.2%) (P &lt; .0001). The prevalence decreased from 10.4% in low-developed to 6.6% in highly developed countries (P &lt; .0001) and increased from 7.3% in countries with HIV prevalence ≤1% to 9.7% in countries with HIV prevalence &gt;1% (P &lt; .0001). Globally, we estimated that there were 3 136 500 (95% CI, 2 952 000–3 284 100) cases of HBV in PLWH, with 73.8% of estimated regional cases from sub-Saharan Africa and 17.1% from Asia and the Pacific. Conclusions This study suggests a high burden of HBV infection in PLWH, with disparities according to region, level of development, and country HIV prevalence.

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to provide a contemporaneous estimate of the global burden of rheumatic heart disease (RHD) from echocardiographic population-based studies. We searched multiple databases between January 01, 1996 and October 17, 2017. Random-effect meta-analysis was used to pool data. We included 82 studies (1,090,792 participant) reporting data on the prevalence of RHD and 9 studies on the evolution of RHD lesions. The pooled prevalence of RHD was 26.1‰ (95%CI 19.2–33.1) and 11.3‰ (95%CI 7.2–16.2) for studies which used the World Heart Federation (WHF) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria, respectively. The prevalence of RHD varied inversely with the level of a country’s income, was lower with the WHO criteria compared to the WHF criteria, and was lowest in South East Asia. Definite RHD progressed in 7.5% (95% CI 1.5–17.6) of the cases, while 60.7% (95% CI 42.4–77.5) of cases remained stable over the course of follow-up. The proportion of cases borderline RHD who progressed to definite RHD was 11.3% (95% CI 6.9–16.5). The prevalence of RHD across WHO regions remains high. The highest prevalence of RHD was noted among studies which used the WHF diagnostic criteria. Definite RHD tends to progress or remain stable over time.

No abstract