Subfertility is a major risk factor for adverse perinatal outcome in ART singletons, however, even in the same mother an ART singleton has a poorer outcome than the non-ART sibling; hence, factors related to the hormone stimulation and/or IVF methods per se also may play a part. Further research is required into mechanisms of epigenetic modification in human embryos and the effects of cryopreservation on this, whether milder ovarian stimulation regimens can improve embryo quality and endometrial conditions, and whether longer culture times for embryos has a negative influence on the perinatal outcome.
Perinatal outcomes in this large population-based cohort of children born after FET from three Nordic countries compared with fresh IVF and ICSI and spontaneous conception were in agreement with the literature.
Long-term health Neurodevelopmental health Cardiovascular function and metabolism Growth Respiratory and allergic disorders Malignancies Reproductive health Controlled ovarian stimulation Laboratory factors Culture media Culture time Number of embryos transferred Oocyte donation and gestational surrogacy Oocyte vitrification Epigenetics Imprinting disorders The chicken or the egg? Subfertility and sibling studies Future research Conclusion The conclusion we can reach from the well designed studies aimed at disentangling the influence on child health of parental and ART factors is that both the chicken and the egg matter.
Singleton ICSI and IVF 5-year-olds are more likely to need health care resources than naturally conceived children. Assessment of singleton ICSI and IVF children at 5 years of age was generally reassuring, however, we found that ICSI children presented with more major congenital malformations and both ICSI and IVF children were more likely to need health care resources than naturally conceived children. Ongoing monitoring of these children is therefore required.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.