No abstract

Purpose: To report treatment outcomes of penile cancer in a single institution in Thailand and to identify prognostic factors for survival, highlighting the crucial role of multi-modality treatment (MMT). Patients and Methods: Squamous cell carcinoma of penis patients who were treated at Srinagarind hospital between 2007-2015 were retrospectively analyzed. Clinical and pathological data were retrospectively reviewed. Overall survival (OS) was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and data were compared using the Log rank test. Cox regression analysis of factors affecting survival was conducted. Results: A total of 70 patients were identified with a median follow-up of 69.4 months. Twenty-eight patients (40%) presented with early-stage (stage I or II), whereas 42 patients (60%) were stage III or IV disease. The median OS was 29.3 months (Interquartile range 10.5 months-not reached) for the entire cohort. Nodal involvement was the only factor identified from the multivariate model with the adjusted HR or 5.74 (95% CI 2.52-13.04). For patients with stage IIIB/IV, multi-modality treatment (MMT) resulted in longer survival when compared with surgery alone (HR 0.37; 95% CI 0.16-0.90). Conclusion: Patients with penile cancer in Thailand presented with younger age and more locally advanced stage. Nodal involvement is the single poor prognostic factor for OS and MMT was associated with longer survival in stage IIIB/IV disease.

Background Smart lens is a magnifying device that turns the smartphone into a microscopic exploring instrument. It is a convenient and inexpensive tool as an on-site evaluation device for the kidney biopsy specimen. We demonstrate the benefit of using a handheld smartphone microscope compared to the standard procedure in allograft kidney specimens. Material and methods This was a cohort study of allograft kidney biopsies performed between June 2015 and November 2017 in Srinagarind Hospital, Khon Kaen University, Thailand. The clinical utility of the “Chula smart lens” applied to the smartphone as an on-site evaluation device was studied. Clinical data, diagnostic quality, and complications were retrospectively reviewed and compared between the smart lens group and the standard group. Results The study cohort consisted of 93 allograft kidney biopsies (standard:47, smart lens:46). The mean age was 40.6 (18–48) years, and 63 patients (67.7%) were male. By using the smart lens device, the number of obtained tissue cores was higher (3.5 vs 2.9, p = 0.019) and the inadequacy rate for diagnosis was significantly lower (7% vs 21.3%, p = 0.05). Conclusion Using a handheld smartphone microscope as an on-site evaluation device resulted in more positive glomeruli and diagnostic yield compared to the standard procedure.

Purpose To determine if age should be considered a relative contraindication to surgery for safety reasons. Methods Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients who underwent nephrectomy from January 2007 to December 2017 were analyzed retrospectively. Patients were grouped into age<65 and age≥65 years. The demographic data, surgical outcomes, complication, hospital stay, blood loss, and survival were compared between the two groups. Results A total of 101 patients were included; 74 in the younger group, and 27 in the older group. Compared to the young group, lower BMI, higher anemia, higher ASA grade, and comorbidities were frequent in the elderly. The operative time, blood loss, and renal function decline were comparable between two age groups. The complication rates in the older and younger group were 22% and 12%, respectively. The survival time was shorter in older patients compared to the younger ones; hazard ratio 2.25; 95%CI 1.08–4.69, p -value=0.031. Conclusion Nephrectomy in elderly patients is safe and feasible and preoperative assessment along with diligent postoperative care may further increase survival. Age alone cannot be regarded as a contraindication for nephrectomy in RCC.