The optimal administration regimens of low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) have not yet been established. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of 2500 and 5000 XaI units of the LMWH dalteparin in patients undergoing elective general surgery for malignant and benign abdominal disease. Prophylaxis was started in the evening before surgery and given once-daily every evening thereafter. The study was designed as a prospective, randomized, double-blind, multicentre trial. Some 66.4 per cent of patients were operated on for a malignant disorder. The primary endpoint was deep vein thrombosis (DVT) detected with the fibrinogen uptake test. Bleeding complications were recorded and classified. Analysis was made both on an intention to treat basis and in patients given correct prophylaxis (86.3 per cent). A total of 2097 patients were randomized and 27 excluded after randomization. A technically correct fibrinogen uptake test was obtained in 1957 patients. The incidence of DVT was significantly lower in patients given 5000 XaI units, this being true for both correct prophylaxis (6.8 versus 13.1 per cent, P < 0.001), on an intention to treat basis (6.6 versus 12.7 per cent, P < 0.001), and in patients with malignant disease (8.5 versus 14.9 per cent, P < 0.001). Sixty-seven patients (3.2 per cent) died within 30 days with no difference between the groups. There were two cases of fatal pulmonary embolism. The frequency of bleeding complications in the whole series was higher in patients randomized to 5000 XaI units (4.7 versus 2.7 per cent, P = 0.02), although this was not the case in those operated on for malignant disease (4.6 versus 3.6 per cent, P not significant). Dalteparin in the dose of 5000 XaI units started in the evening before surgery has a good thromboprophylactic effect in high-risk general surgery at the cost of a small bleeding risk. In patients with malignant disease there was no increased risk of bleeding. The overall frequency of fatal pulmonary embolism with dalteparin is extremely low, even in this high-risk group of patients.

In a randomized, prospective, double-blind multicentre trial, the effect of conventional low-dose heparin 5000 units twice daily, was compared with that of a low molecular weight heparin fragment (4000-5000) 5000 anti-factor Xa units once daily. Four hundred and thirty-two patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were analysed for development of deep vein thrombosis (125I-labelled fibrinogen test) and haemorrhagic complications. Thrombosis occurred in a 4.3 per cent of patients in the low-dose heparin group and in 6.4 per cent of patients in the heparin fragment group, a difference which is not significant. There was a significant delay in the onset of thrombosis in the heparin fragment group. Mortality did not differ between the groups, nor did peroperative blood loss or transfusion requirements or infectious complications. Haemorrhagic complications occurred significantly more often in the fragment group (11.6 per cent) than in the conventional heparin group (4.6 per cent). Patients in the heparin fragment group experienced local pain following the subcutaneous injection significantly less often.

A prospective randomized double-blind trial was performed comparing conventional low-dose heparin with a low molecular weight heparin fragment for thromboprophylaxis in elective general abdominal surgical patients. The first dose of the heparin fragment was given the evening before surgery, and further doses were given thereafter every evening. There were 1002 analysable patients, 826 having received correct prophylaxis. Of these 1002 patients, 64 per cent were operated on for malignant disease. A total of 20 patients died, 10 in each group. The frequency of deep vein thrombosis was significantly reduced among patients with correct prophylaxis with the heparin fragment (9.2-5.0 per cent, P = 0.02) [corrected]. The frequency of bleeding was 6.7 per cent among the heparin fragment patients and 2.7 per cent among the patients given conventional heparin (P = 0.01), but all bleeds were of minor degree and there was no difference in the reoperation rate for bleeding, or in the transfusion requirements. Local pain at the injection site was reported significantly less often among patients given the heparin fragment.

In a randomized, prospective, double-blind multicenter trial, the effect of low-dose conventional heparin (5,000 IU/12 h) was compared to a low molecular weight (LMW) heparin fragment (5,000 antifactor Xa U/24 h). 432 patients 40 years or older undergoing elective abdominal surgery were included, 382 correctly treated. 45% had malignant diseases. The groups did not differ in risk factors. Analysis was made both on the basis of intention to treat and correct prophylaxis. No difference in results between these 2 groups was seen. Deep vein thrombosis (¹²⁵I-fibrinogen) occurred in 4.3% of the low-dose heparin group and in 6.4 of the LMW heparin group. There was a significant delay in the onset of deep vein thrombosis in the LMW heparin group. Mortality, peroperative blood loss, transfusions or infectious complications did not differ. Hemorrhagic complications occurred significantly more often in the LMW heparin group (11.6%) than in the low-dose heparin group (4.6%). Significantly fewer patients experienced local injection pain in the LMW heparin group. APTT and AT III were similar in both groups, but anti-Xa activity was significantly higher in the LMW heparin group. Single daily LMW heparin injection reduced the frequency of deep vein thrombosis to the same level as low-dose heparin twice daily. The dose or administration interval of LMW heparin in this study caused significantly more bleeding complications.

A prospective randomized double-blind trial was performed comparing conventional low-dose heparin with a low molecular weight heparin fiagment for thromboprophylaxis in elective general abdominal surgical patients. The first dose of the heparin jiagment was given the evening before surgery, and further doses were given thereafter every evening. There were 1002 analysable patients, 826 having received correct prophylaxis. Of these 1002 patients, 64 per cent were operated on for malignant disease. A total of 20 patients died, 10 in each group. The 5-0 per cent, P = 0.02). The jiequency of bleeding was 6.7 per cent among patients with correct prophylaxis with the heparin jiagrnent (9.2-5.0 per cent, P=0.02). The frequency of bleeding was 6.7 per cent among the heparin ,fragment patients and 2.7 per cent among the patients given conventional heparin (P=0.01), but all bleeds were of minor degree and there was no difference in the reoperation rate for bleeding, or in the transfusion requirements. Local pain at the injection site was reported significantly less often among patients given the heparin j-agment.