PURPOSE Geographic access to care is an important measure of health equity. In this study, we describe geographic access to cancer care centers (CCCs) in Rwanda with the current facilities providing care and examine how access could change with expanded care infrastructure. METHODS Health facilities included are public hospitals administered by the Rwanda Ministry of Health. The WorldPop Project was used to estimate population distribution, and OpenStreetMap was used to determine travel routes. On the basis of geolocations of the facilities, AccessMod 5 was used to estimate the percentage of the population that live within 1 hour, 2 hours, and 4 hours of CCCs under the current (two facilities) and expanded care (seven facilities) scenarios. Variations in access by region, poverty, and level of urbanization were described. RESULTS Currently, 13%, 41%, and 85% of Rwandans can access CCCs within one, two, and 4 hours of travel, respectively. With expansion of CCCs to seven facilities, access increases to 37%, 84%, and 99%, respectively. There is a substantial variation in current geographic access by province, with 1-hour access in Kigali at 98%, whereas access in the Western Province is 0%; care expansion could increase 2-hour access in the Western Province from 1% to 71%. Variation in access is also seen across the level of urbanization, with current 1-hour access in urban versus rural areas of 45% and 8%, respectively. Expanded care results in improvement of 1-hour access to 67% and 33%, respectively. Similar trends were also noted across poverty levels. CONCLUSION Geographical access to CCCs varies substantially by province, level of urbanization, and poverty. These disparities can be alleviated by strategic care expansion to other tertiary care facilities across Rwanda.
Objective:As antiretroviral therapy (ART) has been widely scaled up in Rwanda, life expectancies among people with HIV (PWH) have increased. With increasing viral suppression, AIDS-defining cancers (ADCs) typically decrease; however, as the PWH population ages, non-AIDS-defining cancers (NADCs) will be expected to increase. The aim of this study was to compare cancer diagnoses between PWH and patients without HIV in Rwanda and to describe the changes in the number and types of cancer over time.Design:Retrospective cohort study.Methods:Rwanda National Cancer Registry (RNCR) recorded the HIV status, primary site, and morphological description for cancer diagnoses from 2007 to 2018. Descriptive analyses were carried out by cancer group (HIV+ and HIV–). A portion of patients whose HIV status was unknown (63%) were excluded from the present analysis.Results:Among the 20 258 cases registered in the Registry, there were 1048 PWH and 6359 HIV– individuals. The proportion of ADCs were significantly higher in the PWH group compared to those without HIV (P < 0.001). Among PWH, there was a longitudinal increase in NADCs and a decrease in ADCs (P < 0.001) over time. Among the ADCs in the PWH group, there was a significant decline in Kaposi sarcoma cases over time.Conclusions:The study demonstrates a decreasing frequency of ADCs driven by declines in Kaposi sarcoma diagnoses and an increased frequency of NADCs among PWH in Rwanda over time. These findings support a need for focusing early detection and management efforts on NADCs, as they begin to play a larger role in the disease processes that affect the aging PWH population.
Background: Rwanda is a high cervical cancer-burden country, with an age standardized rate (ASR) of cervical cancer incidence of 41.8 cases per 100,000 people in 2012. In the same year, cervical cancer mortality lay at 26.2 deaths per 100,000 people. Aim: To address this burden, Rwanda initiated the vision inspection with acetic acid (VIA) screening-based strategy in 2013 in line with WHO recommendations for low- and middle-income countries. The target audience of the program was set for women between the ages of 30 and 49 and remains today. Here, we describe the implementation status of the program at the primary health care level; health centers and district hospitals in Rwanda. Methods: Integrating into Rwanda's existing health system, the program was purposefully rooted in health centers, with a pathway designed for women who screen positive to be referred to the district hospital for cryotherapy or LEEP, according to the lesions' size. Nurses, midwives and medical officers from health centers and district hospitals are trained through a 10-day curriculum (5 days for theory and 5 days for practice) before initiating the provision of services to clients in routine care. Monitoring of the program is conducted through both quarterly, on-site mentorship and screening indicators that are integrated into Rwanda's Health Management Information System (HMIS), through which facilities report on monthly basis. Results: Since its initiation in August 2013, Rwanda's cervical cancer screening program has been established in 21 of 38 (55%) district hospitals and 256 health centers in their catchment area. Training has been an integral component as well, with at least two nurses/midwives trained at implementing health centers and a medical officer with two nurses/midwives trained on cervical cancer screening and the treatment of precancerous lesions at district hospital. In addition, district hospitals have been equipped with cryotherapy, LEEP, and colposcopy machines. Over this program's implementation three-and-a-half-year course, 38,000 women have been screened for cervical cancer. Conclusion: Using a simple VIA-based strategy, Rwanda has been able to swiftly and effectively increase the number of health facilities implementing cervical cancer screening program. Though additional innovative implementation strategies are still needed to proportionally increase women's screening coverage, these initial steps hold great promise in Rwanda's ability to effectively implement a sustainable cervical cancer screening program.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.