A full description of the cosmic ray experiment on Explorer 12 is given and cosmic ray measurements made during the solar event of September 28, 1961, are reported and discussed. Galactic cosmic ray measurements are also reported. A few hours before the class 3 flare of September 28, two short counting rate increases were observed and are interpreted as electron bursts. The anisotropy of the medium-and low-energy solar protons early in the event and their intensity throughout the event are described. It is found that the history of the intensity of the solar protons is consistent, once isotropy is established, with their having diffused through interplanetary space with an effective mean free path of 0.04 AU. This result is discussed and is shown to be not obviously in disagreement with the generally accepted views regarding the configuration of the interplanetary magnetic field. An estimate of the distance from the sun at which diffusion becomes unimportant and particles escape gives 2 to 3 AU. It is pointed out that simple diffusion (where the particles are scattered from discrete scattering centers and the influence of a general magnetic field is negligible) does not account for the behavior of the anisotropy before isotropy is reached. Two days after the flare, and beginning just before the sudden commencement of a magnetic storm, there was a large increase in the intensity of protons between 2 and 15 Mev, the lower energy limit being determined by the sensitivity of the detectors. As most of these particles, which we have called 'energetic storm particles,' arrived after the sudden commencement occurred, we suggest that they were solar protons trapped within the plasma cloud which caused the magnetic storm. The outline of a possible trapping mechanism is given. Explorer 12 measurements of the Forbush decrease of September 30, 1961, are compared with neutron monitor measurements at I)eep River. The decrease is larger at Explorer 12 by a factor of 1.7 _ 0.3. This paper describes the detectors and discusses the measurements made during the solar cosmic ray event initiated by a class 3 flare on September 28, 1961. Fortunately, the satellite was at apogee both at the time of the arrival of the solar cosmic rays and when the magnetic storm began two days later. The rise and decay of the solar proton intensity were recorded as a function of energy from 2 to 600 Mev. A plasma cloud, apparently emitted at the time of the flare, produced a large magnetic storm and a moderate Forbush decrease about 46 hours later. At the time of the sudden commencement of the magnetic storm, an increase of intensity of low-energy (( 15 Mev) protons was observed. The other four solar cosmic ray 4983 4984 BRYANT, CLINE, DESAI, AND McDONALD
Refinements in the source direction analysis of the observations of the unusual 1979 March 5 gamma-ray transient are presented. The final results from the interplanetary gamma=ray burst network produce a 0.1 arc-min e error box. It is nested inside the initially determined 2 arc-min e source region of Evans et al. (1980) that identified the supernova remnant N4Q in the Large Magellanic Cloud as a possible source.
An unrrsual t r a n s i e n t pulse o f ;b 50 keV photons was detected on 1979March 5 by the gamma-ray burst; sensor netwark using n i n e space probes and satel 1 i tes. I t s c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s are un1"i ke those o f t h e known v a r i e t y o f gamma-ray bursts and therefore suggest t h a t i t was formed e i t h e r by a completely d i f f e r e n t o r i g i n species o r i n a very d -i f f e r e n t manner. I t i s i d e o t i f i e d w i t h the LMC supernova remnant N49 i n t h e accompanying L e t t e r (Evans e t a1 . , 1939a).
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.