With the current trajectory of the 2019‐nCoV outbreak unknown, public health and medicinal measures will both be needed to contain spreading of the virus and to optimize patient outcomes. Although little is known about the virus, an examination of the genome sequence shows strong homology with its better‐studied cousin, SARS‐CoV. The spike protein used for host cell infection shows key nonsynonymous mutations that might hamper the efficacy of previously developed therapeutics but remains a viable target for the development of biologics and macrocyclic peptides. Other key drug targets, including RNA‐dependent RNA polymerase and coronavirus main proteinase (3CLpro), share a strikingly high (>95 %) homology to SARS‐CoV. Herein, we suggest four potential drug candidates (an ACE2‐based peptide, remdesivir, 3CLpro‐1 and a novel vinylsulfone protease inhibitor) that could be used to treat patients suffering with the 2019‐nCoV. We also summarize previous efforts into drugging these targets and hope to help in the development of broad‐spectrum anti‐coronaviral agents for future epidemics.

With the current trajectory of the 2019-nCoV outbreak unknown, public health and medicinal measures will both be needed to contain spreading of the virus and to optimize patient outcomes. While little is known about the virus, an examination of the genome sequence shows strong homology with its more well-studied cousin, SARS-CoV. The spike protein used for host cell infection shows key nonsynonymous mutations which may hamper efficacy of previously developed therapeutics but remains a viable target for the development of biologics and macrocyclic peptides. Other key drug targets, including RdRp and 3CLpro, share a strikingly high (>95%) homology to SARS-CoV. Herein, we suggest 4 potential drug candidates (an ACE2-based peptide, remdesivir, 3CLpro-1 and a novel vinylsulfone protease inhibitor) that can be used to treat patients suffering with the 2019-nCoV. We also summarize previous efforts into drugging these targets and hope to help in the development of broad spectrum anti-coronaviral agents for future epidemics.

With the current trajectory of the 2019-nCoV outbreak unknown, public health and medicinal measures will both be needed to contain spreading of the virus and to optimize patient outcomes. While little is known about the virus, an examination of the genome sequence shows strong homology with its more well-studied cousin, SARS-CoV. The spike protein used for host cell infection shows key nonsynonymous mutations which may hamper efficacy of previously developed therapeutics but remains a viable target for the development of biologics and macrocyclic peptides. Other key drug targets, including RdRp and 3CLpro, share a strikingly high (>95%) homology to SARS-CoV. Herein, we suggest 4 potential drug candidates (an ACE2-based peptide, remdesivir, 3CLpro-1 and a novel vinylsulfone protease inhibitor) that can be used to treat patients suffering with the 2019-nCoV. We also summarize previous efforts into drugging these targets and hope to help in the development of broad spectrum anti-coronaviral agents for future epidemics.

The stomach-derived hormone ghrelin mainly acts in the brain. Studies in mice have shown that the accessibility of ghrelin into the brain is limited and that it mainly takes place in some circumventricular organs, such as the median eminence. Notably, some known brain targets of ghrelin are distantly located from the circumventricular organs. Thus, we hypothesized that ghrelin could also access the brain via the blood-cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) barrier, which consists of the choroid plexus and the hypothalamic tanycytes. Using systemic injection of ghrelin or fluorescent-ghrelin in mice, we found that cells of the blood-CSF barrier internalize these molecules. In time-response studies, we found that peripherally injected fluorescent-ghrelin quickly reaches hypothalamic regions located in apposition to the median eminence and more slowly reaches the periventricular hypothalamic parenchyma, adjacent to the dorsal part of the third ventricle. Additionally, we found that CSF ghrelin levels increase after the systemic administration of ghrelin, and that central infusions of either an anti-ghrelin antibody, which immuno-neutralizes CSF ghrelin, or a scrambled version of ghrelin, which is also internalized by cells of the blood-CSF barrier, partially impair the orexigenic effect of peripherally injected ghrelin. Thus, current evidence suggests that the blood-CSF barrier can transport circulating ghrelin into the brain, and that the access of ghrelin into the CSF is required for its full orexigenic effect.

As the pathogen of COVID‐19, SARS‐CoV‐2 encodes two essential cysteine proteases that process the pathogen's two large polypeptide products pp1a and pp1ab in the human cell host to form 15 functionally important, mature nonstructural proteins. One of the two enzymes is papain‐like protease or PL Pro . It possesses deubiquitination and deISGylation activities that suppress host innate immune responses toward SARS‐CoV‐2 infection. To repurpose drugs for PL Pro , we experimentally screened libraries of 33 deubiquitinase and 37 cysteine protease inhibitors on their inhibition of PL Pro . Our results showed that 15 deubiquitinase and 1 cysteine protease inhibitors exhibit strong inhibition of PL Pro at 200 μM. More comprehensive characterizations revealed seven inhibitors GRL0617, SJB2‐043, TCID, DUB‐IN‐1, DUB‐IN‐3, PR‐619, and S130 with an IC 50 value below 40 μM and four inhibitors GRL0617, SJB2‐043, TCID, and PR‐619 with an IC 50 value below 10 μM. Among four inhibitors with an IC 50 value below 10 μM, SJB2‐043 is the most unique in that it does not fully inhibit PL Pro but has a noteworthy IC 50 value of 0.56 μM. SJB2‐043 likely binds to an allosteric site of PL Pro to convene its inhibition effect, which needs to be further investigated. As a pilot study, the current work indicates that COVID‐19 drug repurposing by targeting PL Pro holds promise, but in‐depth analysis of repurposed drugs is necessary to avoid omitting critical allosteric inhibitors.

Ghrelin and its receptor, the growth hormone secretagogue receptor 1a (GHSR1a), are present in cardiac tissue. Activation of GHSR1a by ghrelin promotes cardiomyocyte contractility and survival, and changes in myocardial GHSR1a and circulating ghrelin track with end-stage heart failure, leading to the hypothesis that GHSR1a is a biomarker for heart failure. We hypothesized that GHSR1a could also be a biomarker for diabetic cardiomyopathy (DCM). We used two models of streptozotocin (STZ)-induced DCM: group 1, adult mice treated with 35 mg/kg STZ for 3 days; and group 2, neonatal mice treated with 70 mg/kg STZ at days 2 and 5 after birth. In group 1, mild fasting hyperglycemia (11 mM) was first detected 8 weeks after the last injection, and in group 2, severe fasting hyperglycemia (20 mM) was first detected 1 to 3 weeks after the last injection. In group 1, left ventricular function was slightly impaired as measured by echocardiography, and Western blot analysis showed a significant decrease in myocardial GHSR1a. In group 2, GHSR1a levels were also decreased as assessed by Cy5-ghrelin(1–19) fluorescence microscopy, and there was a significant negative correlation between GHSR1a levels and glucose tolerance. There were significant positive correlations between GHSR1a and ghrelin and between GHSR1a and sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+-ATPase 2a (SERCA2a), a marker for contractility, but not between GHSR1a and B-type natriuretic peptide, a marker for heart failure. We conclude that the subclinical stage of DCM is accompanied by alterations in the myocardial ghrelin-GHSR1a system, suggesting the possibility of a biomarker for DCM.

Currently, the early preclinical detection of left ventricular dysfunction is difficult because biomarkers are not specific for the cardiomyopathic process. The underlying molecular mechanisms leading to heart failure remain elusive, highlighting the need for identification of cardiac-specific markers. The growth hormone secretagogue receptor (GHSR) and its ligand ghrelin are present in cardiac tissue and are known to contribute to myocardial energetics. Here, we examined tissue ghrelin-GHSR levels as specific markers of cardiac dysfunction in patients who underwent cardiac transplantation. Samples of cardiac tissue were obtained from 10 patients undergoing cardiac transplant at the time of organ harvesting and during serial posttransplant biopsies. Quantitative fluorescence microscopy using a fluorescent ghrelin analog was used to measure levels of GHSR, and immunofluorescence was used to measure levels of ghrelin, B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP), and tissue markers of cardiomyocyte contractility and growth. GHSR and ghrelin expression levels were highly variable in the explanted heart, less in the grafted heart biopsies. GHSR and ghrelin were strongly positively correlated, and both markers were negatively correlated with left ventricular ejection fraction. Ghrelin had stronger positive correlations than BNP with the signaling markers for contractility and growth. These data suggest that GHSR-ghrelin have potential use as an integrated marker of cardiac dysfunction. Interestingly, tissue ghrelin appeared to be a more sensitive indicator than BNP to the biochemical processes that are characteristic of heart failure. This work allows for further use of ghrelin-GHSR to interrogate cardiac-specific biochemical mechanisms in preclinical stages of heart failure (HF).

No abstract