Few patients with brain tumor missed the ninth grade certificate at the age of 16. Grades in foreign language (representing verbal performance) were most affected. However, the patients fared poorer than controls in each subject. The difference was most pronounced among girls. Girls were more sensitive to the adverse effects of irradiation.

No abstract

No abstract

Summary Cancer incidence was studied among 3072 first-degree relatives of 559 unselected ovarian cancer patients. Among cohort members there were 306 cancer cases. The overall cancer incidence was not increased: the standardised incidence ratio (SIR) in males was 0.9 (95% confidence interval 0.8-1.1) and in females 1.0 (0.8 -1.1). The female relatives had a significantly increased risk for ovarian cancer (SIR 2.8, 1.8-4.2). The excess was attributable to sisters only (SIR 3.7, 2.3 -5.7). The relative risk for ovarian cancer among sisters decreased both by increasing age of the sister and by increasing age at diagnosis of the index patient: the SIRs were 7.3 (1.5-21.4), 4.5 (1.6-9.8) and 3.1 (1.7-5.4) for sisters of index patients diagnosed in age <45, 45 -54 and 55 -75 years respectively. The age dependency of the risk supports the role of genetic factors in familial ovarian cancer. Although the risk of ovarian cancer among sisters from families with breast cancer (SIR 9.2, 3.7-19.0) was significantly higher than among sisters from families with no breast cancer patients (SIR 2.9, 1.6-4.8, rate ratio 3.1, P < 0.05), the excess was not solely attributable to coaggregation of breast and ovarian cancer. Among the 27 families with two or more ovarian cancers, only sisters were affected in 24 families, which might implicate recessive inheritance or shared environmental factors influencing ovarian cancer risk in sisters.

5503 Background: Adjuvant therapy for early stage high-risk endometrial cancer remains controversial. Methods: Patients with surgical stage I, II, IIIA (positive peritoneal fluid cytology only), or IIIC (positive pelvic lymph nodes only) were eligible if they, according to departmental guidelines, had a sufficiently high risk for micrometastatic disease to qualify for adjuvant therapy. Most patients had two or more of the risk factors: grade 3, deep myometrial invasion, or DNA non-diploidy, while some patients had only one of these. Patients with serous, clear cell, or anaplastic carcinomas were eligible regardless of risk factors. Patients with para-aortic metastases were not eligible. Lymph node exploration at staging surgery was optional. Pelvic RT ± vaginal brachytherapy was given to a dose =44 Gy. CT was given before or after RT. Before August 2004 CT consisted of four courses of cisplatin =50 mg/m2 + doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 or epirubicin 75 mg/m2 (AP). Thereafter several CT regimens were allowed, of which AP, paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 + epirubicin 60 mg/m2 + carboplatin AUC 5, and paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 + carboplatin AUC 5–6 were used. Progression-free survival (PFS) was the primary end-point. The study was terminated before the aimed goal of 400 patients because of slow recruitment. We decided to make an early analysis since new studies on endometrial cancer are presently discussed. Results: 372 patients were entered between May 1996 and Oct 2006. Of 367 evaluable patients 190 were randomized to RT and 177 to RT+CT. Risk factors were well balanced between the randomization arms. The median follow-up time was 3.5 years. The hazard ratio for PFS was 0.58 in favor of RT+CT (95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.34 - 0.99; p=0.046). This translates to an estimated 7 % absolute difference in 5-year PFS from 75 % (95 % CI 67 % - 82 %) to 82 % (95 % CI 73 % - 88 %). Conclusion: RT+CT was better than RT alone. Next question is if RT+CT is better than CT alone. No significant financial relationships to disclose.