No abstract

Rhesus haemolytic disease is a continuing problem in the newborn especially in countries where the use of anti-D immunoglobulin is not prevalent. The fetuses may need intrauterine transfusions to prevent hydrops faetalis and they also may need exchange transfusions to treat the hyperbilirubinaemia that develops after birth. These interventions expose the baby to several blood donors, hence the risk of infection and exchange transfusions. This study was performed to test whether the use of high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin soon after the birth of these infants reduced the need for exchange transfusions. After randomization, intravenous immunoglobulin was given at a dose of 500 mg/kg to 22 infants in the treatment group. Nothing was given to the 19 controls. The number of exchange transfusions needed decreased significantly in the treatment group. No side-effects of intravenous immunoglobulins were seen.

Introduction: Previous reports of carefully selected patients presenting with stage IV breast cancer (BC) suggest that surgery on the primary tumor may result in improved survival, but this remains unproven. The MF07-01 trial is a phase III randomized controlled trial of BC women with distant metastases at presentation who receive loco-regional (LR) treatment for intact primary tumor compared with those who do not receive such treatment. Aim: The primary objective of the trial is to compare overall survival (OS) in women treated with or without initial LR resection prior to systemic therapy for de novo stage IV BC. Materials and Methods: At the discretion of the surgeon, LR treatments consisted of either mastectomy or breast conserving surgery with level I-II axillary clearance in clinically or sentinel lymph node positive patients. Radiation therapy to whole breast was required following breast conserving surgery. At the discretion of the medical oncologist standard systemic therapy of either endocrine treatment or chemotherapy (plus trastuzumab for HER2 +) was given to all patients either immediately after randomization (no surgery group) or after surgical resection of the intact primary tumor (surgery group). After consideration of previous retrospective studies, the assumed OS difference between the two groups was determined to be 18% (35% in LR treatment group versus 17% in no-LR treatment group). A 10% drop out rate including lost to follow up was assumed. By using a one sided log-rank test with a 95% confidence (α = 0.05) and a 90% power (β = 0.9), sample size calculation revealed that 271 patients were needed to be randomized. Results: There were 140 women in the surgery group and 138 in the no-surgery group. The mean follow up time was 21.1 ± 14.5 months. The mean age was 51.6 ± 13.2 years and the groups were comparable regarding age, BMI, ER/PR, Her 2, Triple negative, tumor type and size between the groups (all p>0.05). Metastatic patterns included bone only in 45.7%, organ except bone in 28.8%, and bone plus organ in 25.5%. There were a total of 86 (31%) deaths. At 54 months the survival rate was 35% in the surgery group and 31% in the no surgery group (p = 0.24). However, OS was statistically higher in bone only, ER/PR positive and patients younger than 50 years but was lower in the triple negative patients (p<0.05). The mean survival was 7.1 months higher in surgery group comparing with no surgery group in bone only metastasis (39.1 ± 1.8 vs 32.0 ± 2.2; p = 0.13). Surgery in the group of patients who had solitary bone only metastasis had statistically significant survival benefit compared with no surgery and with patients who had multiple bone metastasis either with or without surgery (P = 0.03). Conclusion: In early follow-up of this trial comparing surgery of the primary tumor with no surgery in stage IV BC at presentation OS was similar but there were important subgroup differences; in particular those with solitary bone metastasis have a significant survival benefit and patients with bone metastasis only have a trend toward improved survival with initial surgery. Further follow-up will expand on these important findings. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr S2-03.

There are few data about the reliability of sentinel node biopsy in patients with multi-focal breast cancer. The aim of this study was to determine the factors affecting the identification and accuracy of the sentinel node, comparing multifocality with other variables, using peritumoral isosulfan blue dye injection technique alone. Between 1998 and 2001, 122 patients with clinically negative nodes from a single institute were eligible for sentinel lymph node biopsies (SLNBs). All patients underwent conventional axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). SLNs were identified in 111 of 122 (91%) cases, and analyzed by hematoxylin and eosin. Twenty-one patients with multifocal breast cancer were determined by clinical or pathologic examination (gross or microscopic). Success in locating the sentinel node was unrelated to patient's age, tumor size, type, location, histological or nuclear grade, multifocality, or a previous surgical biopsy. SLNBs accurately predicted the status of the axilla in 104 of the 111 patients (93.7%), while 18 of the 21 patients with multi-focal breast cancer (85.7%) had successful lymphatic mapping. The false negative (FN) rate was 11.3% among patients with successful SLNBs. Multifocality and tumor size (>2 cm) were associated significantly with decreased accuracy and increased FN rates (for multifocality, p = 0.007 and p = 0.006, and for tumor size >2 cm, p = 0.04 and p = 0.05, respectively) in binary logistic regression analysis, whereas excisional biopsy, tumor location in the upper outer quadrant and patient's age did not significantly affect the accuracy and FN rates in univariate analysis. These results suggest sentinel lymph node biopsy using peritumoral isosulfan blue injection method alone can accurately predict axillary status in patients with clinically negative nodes, but patients with multi-focal disease and large tumor size may not be ideal candidates.

The management of (Rhesus) hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn includes intrauterine transfusions to prevent the development of hydrops, treatment of the possible hyperbilirubinemia in the immediate postnatal period, and treatment of late anemia. Low levels of serum erythropoietin due to suppression of the bone marrow by multiple intrauterine transfusions is a suggested mechanism for this anemia. The aim of our study was to test whether recombinant human erythropoietin reduced the need for erythrocyte transfusions in these infants. Twenty infants with Rhesus isoimmunization were blindly randomized to treatment and control groups at the 2nd wk of life. The number of intrauterine and exchange transfusions and demographic data were similar in both groups. The infants in the treatment group received recombinant human erythropoietin, s.c. 200 U/kg of body weight three times a week for a period of 6 wk, whereas the infants in the control group received a placebo for the same period. In the treatment group, the mean number of erythrocyte transfusions was significantly lower than that of the control group (1.8 versus 4.2). The reticulocyte counts and Hb levels rose earlier in the treatment group. The platelet and neutrophil counts were similar in both groups throughout the study. This study demonstrates that recombinant human erythropoietin treatment decreases the need for erythrocyte transfusions in the late anemia of infants with Rh isoimmunization. Considering the risks of blood transfusions, this decrease in the donor exposure is worthwhile.