Eight new ruthenium(II) complexes of N,N-chelating pyrazolylbenzimidazole ligands of the general formula [Ru II (p-cym)(L)-X] + [where the ligand L is 2-(1H-pyrazol-1-yl)-1H-benzo [d]imidazole (L1) substituted at the 4 position of the pyrazole ring by Cl (L2), Br (L3), or I (L4) and X = Cl − and I − ] were synthesized and characterized using various analytical techniques. Complexes 1 and 3 were also characterized by single-crystal X-ray crystallography, and they crystallized as a monoclinic crystal system in space groups P2 1 /n and P2 1 /c, respectively. The complexes display good solution stability at physiological pH 7.4. The iodido-coordinated pyrazolylbenzimidazole ruthenium(II) p-cymene complexes (2, 4, 6, and 8) are more resistant toward hydrolysis and have less tendency to form monoaquated complexes in comparison to their chlorido analogues (1, 3, 5, and 7). The halido-substituted 2-(1H-pyrazol-1-yl)-1H-benzo[d]imidazole ligands, designed as organic-directing molecules, inhibit vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR2) phosphorylation. In addition, the ruthenium(II) complexes display a potential to bind to DNA bases. The cytotoxicity profile of the complexes (IC 50 ca. 9−12 μM for 4−8) against the triple-negative breast cancer cells (MDA-MB-231) show that most of the complexes are efficient. The lipophilicity and cellular accumulation data of the complexes show a good correlation with the cytotoxicity profile of 1−8. The representative complexes 3 and 7 demonstrate the capability of arresting the cell cycle in the G2/M phase and induce apoptosis. The inhibition of VEGFR2 phosphorylation with the representative ligands L2 and L4 and the corresponding metal complexes 3 and 7 in vitro shows that the organic-directing ligands and their complexes inhibit VEGFR2 phosphorylation. Besides, L2, L4, 3, and 7 inhibit the phosphorylation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2) and proto-oncogene tyrosine-protein kinase (Src), capable of acting downstream of VEGFR2 as well as independently. Compounds L2, L4, 3, and 7 have a lesser effect on ERK1/2 and more prominently affect Src phosphorylation. We extended the study for L2 and 3 in the Tg(fli1:gfp) zebrafish model and found that L2 is more effective in vivo compared to 3 in inhibiting angiogenesis.
Morpholine motif is an important pharmacophore and, depending on the molecular design, may localize in cellular acidic vesicles. To understand the importance of the presence of pendant morpholine in a metal complex, six bidentate N,O-donor ligands with or without a pendant morpholine unit and their corresponding ruthenium(II) p-cymene complexes (1–6) are synthesized, purified, and structurally characterized by various analytical methods including X-ray diffraction. Complexes 2–4 crystallized in the P21/c space group, whereas 5 and 6 crystallized in the P1̅ space group. The solution stability studies using 1H NMR support instantaneous hydrolysis of the native complexes to form monoaquated species in a solution of 3:7 (v/v) dimethyl sulfoxide-d 6 and 20 mM phosphate buffer (pH* 7.4, containing 4 mM NaCl). The monoaquated complexes are stable for at least up to 24 h. The complexes display excellent in vitro antiproliferative activity (IC50 ca. 1–14 μM) in various cancer cell lines, viz., MDA-MB-231, MiaPaCa2, and Hep-G2. The presence of the pendant morpholine does not improve the dose efficacy, but rather, with 2-[[(2,6-dimethylphenyl)imino]methyl]phenol (HL1) and its pendant morpholine analogue (HL3) giving complexes 1 and 3, respectively, the antiproliferative activity was poorer with 3. MDA-MB-231 cells treated with the complexes show that the acidic vesicles remain acidic, but the population of acidic vesicles increases or decreases with time of exposure, as observed from the dispersed red puncta, depending on the complex used. The presence of the 2,6-disubstituted aniline and the naphthyl group seems to improve the antiproliferative dose. The complex treated MDA-MB-231 cells show that cathepsin D, which is otherwise present in the cytosolic lysosomes, translocates to the nucleus as a result of exposure to the complexes. Irrespective of the presence of a morpholine motif, the complexes do not activate caspase-3 to induce apoptosis and seem to favor the necrotic pathway of cell killing.
Half-sandwich Ru II complexes, [(YZ)Ru II (η 6arene)(X)] + , (YZ = chelating bidentate ligand, X = halide), with N,N and N,O coordination (1-9) show significant antiproliferative activity against the metastatic triple-negative breast carcinoma (MDA-MB-231). 3-aminobenzoic acid or its methyl ester is used in all the ligands while varying the aldehyde for N,N and N,O coordination. In the N,N coordinated complex the coordinated halide(X) is varied for enhancing stability in solution (X=Cl, I). Rapid aquation and halide exchange of the pyridine analogues, 2 and 3, in solution are a major bane towards their antiproliferative activity. Presence of free À COOH group (1 and 4) make complexes hydrophilic and reduces toxicity. The imidazolyl 3aminobenzoate based N,N coordinated 5 and 6 display better solution stability and efficient antiproliferative activity (IC 50 ca. 2.3-2.5 μM) compared to the pyridine based 2 and 3 (IC 50 > 100 μM) or the N,O coordinated complexes (7-9) (IC 50 ca. 7-10 μM). The iodido coordinated, 6, is resistant towards aquation and halide exchange. The N,O coordinated 7-9 underwent instantaneous aquation at pH 7.4 generating monoaquated complexes stable for at least 6 h. Complexes 5 and 6, bind to 9-ethylguanine (9-EtG) showing propensity to interact with DNA bases. The complexes may kill via apoptosis as displayed from the study of 8. The change in coordination mode and the aldehyde affected the solution stability, antiproliferative activity and mechanistic pathways. The N,N coordinated (5 and 6) exhibit arrest in the G2/M phase while the N,O coordinated 8 showed arrest in the G0/ G1 phase.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.